Maze vs. UserQ

Maze

UserQ

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Maze	Score 8.7 out of 10	N/A	Maze is a rapid user testing platform from Maze.design in Paris, designed to give users actionable user insights, in a matter of hours. The vendor states that with it, users can test remotely, autonomously, and collaboratively.	$75 per month 3+ seats
UserQ	Score 0.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	UserQ is a fully remote user research solution that caters for MENA researchers and testers – with Arabic and English testing options, utilising a panel of local testers. UserQ states they are on a mission to make UX research accessible to every brand, manager and researcher in the MENA region. The UserQ panel is used to get access to +10K users in the MENA region, across 100 nationalities and different demographics. Users can recruit from a diverse range of quality testers that match a…	N/A

Pricing

Maze

UserQ

Editions & Modules

Professional: $75
per month 3+ seats
Organization: custom pricing

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Maze	UserQ
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Pay as you go model, based on a credit system. 1$ = 1 credit. A test can be published for 10 credits. Recruitment starts from 2 credits per response.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Maze	UserQ
Considered Both Products	Maze MC Matthew Carter UX research Chose Maze We left sprig to use maze because sprig had unreliable Figma questions and integrations. We chose maze as it was partnered with Dovetail and Askable, that's how we heard about them. We're not particularly loyal or wedded to maze. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze We ran a proof of concept exercise between Maze User Testing and Optimal Workshop. We found both products to be as good as each other in the elements of the products that both offered. Optimal Workshop did offer a lot more than what was required for the specific project for … Incentivized Helpful? D Hendrik Mulyana Product Design lead Chose Maze A lookback is an alternative option if you think Maze User Testing is quite expensive for you, but look back has a different approach to Maze User Testing. Lookback focuses on qualitative usability testing instead of quantitative UserTesting. And also, Maze User Testing has a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze Maze User Testing is brilliant to test with a large volume of people and if you’re not after particular qualitative insights, like UserTesting would offer. The card sorting feature is basic and not as mature as Optimal Workshop would offer but it does the job and can be used in … Incentivized Helpful? Milos Danilovic Lead Product Designer Chose Maze When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze … Incentivized Helpful? AK Akos Krommer Senior Implementation Consultant Chose Maze Figma helps to design and prototype out the concept but it does not allow to facilitate feedback gathering on a specific UI or even UX decision. That's where Maze comes into the picture with it's vaious features that helps to get the right insight to build a better product in a … Incentivized Helpful? Bryce Thompson Lead Experience Designer Chose Maze UserTesting Expensive Not as modern a UX as Maze for contributors, stakeholders, and testers Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Maze I find Maze's UI more user friendly Incentivized Helpful?	UserQ No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Maze	UserQ
Small Businesses	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Maze	UserQ
Likelihood to Recommend	6.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Maze	UserQ
Likelihood to Recommend	Suited for: - I think that this software is a must-have for any experience or product designer that needs validation from any audience - Designers that rapidly prototype with Figma - Designers looking to establish an inexpensive way to deliver on user testing Less appropriate for: - If you are looking for a survey replacement this is probably not for you even though it does that quite well, simply due to the cost. Google Forms would be a more fiscal choice. - Marketing visual designers who are adept at visual builder tools (WebFlow, Divi, Elementor, etc) with A/B testing ability would probably find other products more valuable. Bryce Thompson Lead Experience Designer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	It helps to gather quick and helpful insight It helps greatly to validate design and prototypes Intuitive tool and easy to work with Incentivized AK Akos K Senior Implementation Consultant Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Too easy to delete a draft Maze User Testing - I lost all my progress yesterday and had to redo it Some testers have mentioned the Maze User Testing interface was hard to use - didn't get specifics on that Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Any issues that presented themselves were dealt with in a quick and efficient manner and fully rectified by the knowledgeable team over at Maze. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze could really tick all the above boxes. Incentivized Milos Danilovic Lead Product Designer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	You are able to validate your project or design with a maze User Testing. Maze User Testing is an all-in-one usability tool platform. You are able to create a multi-scenario for a free option with limited features. Pricing is quite expensive. if they have an option for less than $99/month. A freelancer or small company can consider using it. Incentivized D Hendrik Mulyana Product Design lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Maze Screenshots	UserQ Screenshots