Maze vs. UXtweak

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Maze
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Maze is a rapid user testing platform from Maze.design in Paris, designed to give users actionable user insights, in a matter of hours. The vendor states that with it, users can test remotely, autonomously, and collaboratively.
$75
per month 3+ seats
UXtweak
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The UX research tool UXtweak helps business users to understand what customers think and feel about a website, app, or prototype. The UXtweak platform's features include competitive usability testing, complex website testing, session recording, card sorting, tree testing, mobile testing,and prototype testing. Using these tools helps to see a website from the users' point of view and discover what matters the most to…
$0
Free
Pricing
MazeUXtweak
Editions & Modules
Professional
$75
per month 3+ seats
Organization
custom pricing
Starter
$0
Free
Plus
$99
per month per seat
Business
$179
per month per seat
Enterprise
Customizable
Contact us
Business Plan with Pre-paid Participants
Starting at $279
per month Per seat + number of pre-paid study participants
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MazeUXtweak
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsWith annual billing you can save 20% off your purchase!
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MazeUXtweak
Considered Both Products
Maze
Chose Maze
We left sprig to use maze because sprig had unreliable Figma questions and integrations. We chose maze as it was partnered with Dovetail and Askable, that's how we heard about them. We're not particularly loyal or wedded to maze.
Chose Maze
We ran a proof of concept exercise between Maze User Testing and Optimal Workshop. We found both products to be as good as each other in the elements of the products that both offered. Optimal Workshop did offer a lot more than what was required for the specific project for …
Chose Maze
A lookback is an alternative option if you think Maze User Testing is quite expensive for you, but look back has a different approach to Maze User Testing. Lookback focuses on qualitative usability testing instead of quantitative UserTesting. And also, Maze User Testing has a …
Chose Maze
Maze User Testing is brilliant to test with a large volume of people and if you’re not after particular qualitative insights, like UserTesting would offer. The card sorting feature is basic and not as mature as Optimal Workshop would offer but it does the job and can be used in …
Chose Maze
When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze …
Chose Maze
Figma helps to design and prototype out the concept but it does not allow to facilitate feedback gathering on a specific UI or even UX decision. That's where Maze comes into the picture with it's vaious features that helps to get the right insight to build a better product in a …
Chose Maze
UserTesting
  • Expensive
  • Not as modern a UX as Maze for contributors, stakeholders, and testers
UXtweak
Chose UXtweak
UXtweak has a more diverse toolkit and its learning curve wasn’t as steep. Moreover, UXtweak’s pricing was more acceptable to us and we felt it had a better price/quality relation.
Chose UXtweak
During the selection process we have discovered the following:
  • better feature set
  • better pricing/value ratio
Chose UXtweak
I have also looked into getting UserZoom and UserTesting, but their cost is much higher, so I chose UXtweak as a more affordable alternative.
Best Alternatives
MazeUXtweak
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MazeUXtweak
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MazeUXtweak
Likelihood to Recommend
Suited for: - I think that this software is a must-have for any experience or product designer that needs validation from any audience - Designers that rapidly prototype with Figma - Designers looking to establish an inexpensive way to deliver on user testing Less appropriate for: - If you are looking for a survey replacement this is probably not for you even though it does that quite well, simply due to the cost. Google Forms would be a more fiscal choice. - Marketing visual designers who are adept at visual builder tools (WebFlow, Divi, Elementor, etc) with A/B testing ability would probably find other products more valuable.
Read full review
UXtweak is suitable for everyone, whether you are a student, the owner of a small or large business, or a professional UX designer or researcher. UXtweak will assist you in resolving any issue, large or little. You may test many components of the site using a wide range of tools. And, owing to its starting plan, it is accessible to anyone.
Read full review
Pros
  • It helps to gather quick and helpful insight
  • It helps greatly to validate design and prototypes
  • Intuitive tool and easy to work with
Read full review
  • Tree testing
  • Website usability testing
  • Card Sorting
  • The customer support
Read full review
Cons
  • Too easy to delete a draft Maze User Testing - I lost all my progress yesterday and had to redo it
  • Some testers have mentioned the Maze User Testing interface was hard to use - didn't get specifics on that
Read full review
  • Implement native iOS testing
  • Dashboard redesign
Read full review
Support Rating
Any issues that presented themselves were dealt with in a quick and efficient manner and fully rectified by the knowledgeable team over at Maze.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze could really tick all the above boxes.
Read full review
UXtweak has a more diverse toolkit and its learning curve wasn’t as steep. Moreover, UXtweak’s pricing was more acceptable to us and we felt it had a better price/quality relation.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • You are able to validate your project or design with a maze User Testing. Maze User Testing is an all-in-one usability tool platform.
  • You are able to create a multi-scenario for a free option with limited features.
  • Pricing is quite expensive. if they have an option for less than $99/month. A freelancer or small company can consider using it.
Read full review
  • Increased ROI on conversion landing pages
  • Increased time on page
  • Improved UX
Read full review
ScreenShots

Maze Screenshots

Screenshot of Maze

UXtweak Screenshots

Screenshot of UXtweak's 12 toolsScreenshot of UXtweak DashboardScreenshot of Study ResultsScreenshot of Test almost anything with UXtweak