MediaValet’s Digital Asset Management platform makes enterprise digital libraries accessible, discoverable, and shareable to the organization's entire ecosystem – globally.
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.
N/A
Pricing
MediaValet
Oracle WebCenter Content
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MediaValet
Oracle WebCenter Content
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MediaValet
Oracle WebCenter Content
Features
MediaValet
Oracle WebCenter Content
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
MediaValet
8.0
9 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
8.27 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content analytics
7.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM Features
Comparison of DAM Features features of Product A and Product B
MediaValet
8.1
18 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Uploading assets
8.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Downloading assets
8.718 Ratings
00 Ratings
Categories
8.417 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset storage
8.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset sharing
8.417 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset search
7.617 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tagging system
7.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content editing
7.811 Ratings
00 Ratings
Metadata
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collections
8.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
User access
8.315 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM Integrations
7.96 Ratings
00 Ratings
DAM API
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow automations
7.87 Ratings
00 Ratings
Related asset discovery
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
MediaValet
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
5% below category average
Content capture & imaging
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Document management
00 Ratings
8.64 Ratings
Records management
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
00 Ratings
6.93 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
MediaValet is an exceptional tool for our end users. We upload the images and they find them. Most often with great ease. Had we known how many images we would be adding, and our different audiences from the start, we might have set up our file structure a little differently.
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
Replace an old version of an asset with a newer one without having to check-out, then check-in
Sharing an asset or a set of assets via a share link -- would be great to generate shorter, dynamic URLs for sharing as opposed to the longer string URLs it currently generates
It is not only likely, but we have been doing it for more than 6 years. We have even had the service since before I joined the company. The service works well for me and I hope that this service will continue to be renewed next year, as not having it would make my job more complicated.
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
I mainly use MediValet to send special medical images to our partners. Collaboration with other companies is very simplified through MediaValet. The qualitatively uploaded images can be excactly assigned and organised through various filters. It is much clearer and easier for our partners to understand when the images have been accurately labelled and assigned beforehand.
Asset sharing and organization is better, more user friendly, and more appealing within MediaValet. The layout and flexibility give these portals a much more professional look and feel. Both internally and externally we have appreciated the output of these specific portals much more than what we had been attempting to share with these other programs.
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
While we have had MediaValet only for a short period, we are already seeing improvements in how quickly certain projects can be completed.
I recently created an Annual Report which had a lot of big image files and data tables and using a Lightbox with our design agency to share these files saved us a huge amount of time.
As we roll out MediaValet to the teams, staff are becoming more aware of the quality, amount, and value of our best assets.
We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.