Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot, formerly Clearbit, is a data enrichment product that automatically updates sales records with verified company and contact data, with the goal of providing better insights into prospects.
$20,000
Annually
Metadata.io
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$295
per month per installation
Pricing
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
Metadata.io
Editions & Modules
All Plans
$20,000.00
Annually
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Breeze Intelligence for Hubspot
Metadata.io
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$2,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional Details
Pricing is based on CRM database size, monthly web traffic, and monthly contact creation. Each product is subject to individual terms and plans may be available on a monthly or annual subscription.
For more information, contact Clearbit.
Clearbit is better in terms of brand recognition and after Husbpot acquisition it has improved in terms of data volume, data quality, and features apart from data enrichment also. The pricing is a bit on the higher side but worth because of the data quality and Hubspot …
When evaluating data enrichment solutions, we compared Clearbit against alternatives like ZoomInfo, InsideView, and D&B Hoovers. Clearbit emerged as our preferred choice for several key reasons:
Clearbit has been extremely beneficial for our organization. We still use and have access to some other tools, but it's the net new targeting that stands out for us, rather than a BlackBox of accounts that are in the market. When it comes to paid social where tracking and …
At that time we were thinking of a few more tools available in market. But once we reached out to them and got to know the features and ease of use, we narrowed down our search to Clearbit. Its integration with Salesforce with added features along with the pricing was best …
Time to realize ROI and system capability was not very clear, and my client was hesitant to take unnecessary risks. Time was not on our side in this selection and evaluation process. The client decided to go with Clearbit based on many factors but ultimately, the feedback …
The SDR team were using Clearbit and EverString together for a while for enhanced prospecting and prospect contact details. Now, however, only the research team uses EverString to enrich contact and company information in our prospected accounts.
DiscoverOrg has better contact info, but not as much company info (they focus on larger companies). Also, DiscoverOrg was much more expensive. Additionally DiscoverOrg wouldn't have satisfied our need to enrich our back-end database.
Clearbit is right up there with similar products. I find Clearbit useful in certain situations and specific industries. The user experience and integrations make it an easy tool to learn and use. In all this is a great tool, but I would like to see a broader range of data.
I use Full Contact for some applications and Clearbit for others. I have used Clearbit as a google extension and have enjoyed the clean interface. I love the UI in Clearbit and the simplicity of the design. Easy access and simple.
Clearbit is extremely more powerful than data.com. Clearbit has quality data, the ability to map directly into our Salesforce, multiple filters to search, api, and widget that connects to LinkedIn. The two are not comparable in terms of usage and capabilities to generate new …
DiscoverOrg is far better in terms of enrichment and overall usability. My experience with DiscoverOrg has provided me with more opportunities to close business.
Pricing. You can't beat metadata's metamatch audience package. Clearbit charges on a CPM basis on the amount of spend used on a certain audience while metadata is a flat fee
We choose Metadata.io because their solution would bring B2B targeting on all platforms. Other providers only offer this feature only on Facebook. Metadata.io also works as a campaign management platform, meanwhile, other providers only create audiences that are pushed to the …
These aren't apples-to-apples comparisons: I used Triblio at a previous company. Triblio is primarily for ABM display and you can have smaller audience pools (to the company level). Metadata has a display ad component that I am not currently licensed for. Triblio has added ABM …
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't …
Rollworks use case was more traditional ABM. Metadata is truly a paid social powerhouse for us. It's integral to our paid social program. It has more audience & ad capabilities as well.
Clearbit is great for companies with large sales teams who focus on high touch prospecting. The time saved by not having to search a prospect's LinkedIn profile, but simply see data in the CRM is awesome. On the other hand, Clearbit may not be as ideal in a company where sales are very transactional
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
Clearbit is like other products that I use and the biggest challenge I have is getting it to work with the programs I want to use. I would love to have all my programs flow through something like Clearbit without a lot of programming and API juggling. Not a Clearbit issue, however, it would be awesome to have a universal IO API that we can all plug into and make life simple.
The majority of the time it provides quick, accessible and easy to use information about the company and contact information. This has really helped us to personalise our outreach while also making it faster to prospect accounts. I don't give it a ten as this information can be inaccurate. Including the LinkedIn link which sometimes re-directs to old LinkedIn accounts, or just the wrong one. This seems to be caused by not updating the information regularly enough (just a feeling, no evidence)
Clearbit is very easy to use. Any new joiner can self-onboard, self-learn in matter of hours, if not minutes. Its integration feature within Hubspot and also with Salesforce makes it easy for marketing team to use it every day. The customer support team is also very responsive and helpful to resolve issues within few days
The team has been extremely helpful and works with us one on one with issues we come across. My main issues with the service is it’s outward interactions with us since purchasing the product. They have not proactively checked in to see how our is doing with the product.
Clearbit is right up there with similar products. I find Clearbit useful in certain situations and specific industries. The user experience and integrations make it an easy tool to learn and use. In all this is a great tool, but I would like to see a broader range of data
These aren't apples-to-apples comparisons: I used Triblio at a previous company. Triblio is primarily for ABM display and you can have smaller audience pools (to the company level). Metadata has a display ad component that I am not currently licensed for. Triblio has added ABM features like personalized landing pages and resource hubs specific to target companies which have the potential to be really effective. I evaluated Influ2. They seem to be really great at targeting a person level across channels. So you can run a campaign to an audience as small as 1-5 people at a specific company using various targeting methods including email upload. Metadata can't get this granular.
Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things