TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.

    $2.50

    per user/per month

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Editions & Modules
    Academic
    $2.50
    per user/per month
    Standalone
    $5.20
    per user/per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers strong integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure services, which provide a unified security experience. While McAfee Trellix is known for solid antivirus, Microsoft Defender excels in integration in the ecosystem.
    Incentivized
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    At the time we took the decision all other products seemed to be complicated in usage and licensing. Trellix was very simple in all the aspects: licensing, usage, support.
    It also was very simple to deploy, setup and manage.
    Product interface was simple to understand and even …
    Incentivized
    Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    8.3
    56 Ratings
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    8.8
    14 Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology7.653 Ratings9.312 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.155 Ratings8.813 Ratings
    Centralized Management8.955 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support7.110 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Infection Remediation9.454 Ratings8.913 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management7.252 Ratings8.211 Ratings
    Malware Detection8.955 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (99 ratings)
    9.3
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.4
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    5.0
    (6 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)