Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Selected because of Intercompany workflow, consolidated reporting functionality, system controls, available modules for fixed assets and inventory. GP was the best value for the points mentioned.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Does not stack up against SAP as it does not have the level of flexibility offered by SAP. JD Edwards software was awful, no comparison.
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Anaplan and OneStream
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM did a fabulous job in our webinars and focused demos.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Hyperion System 11, Blackline, Coupa, PeopleSoft, Oracle HCM
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It is a great product for Dashboarding and story telling. It is adding value to the Corporate Finance and Data Governance Teams when used together with EPM Cloud.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM was the only product we have evaluated.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Enterprise Planning Cloud has a well-defined objective for financial users with their budgeting and forecasting. We don't have another tool to do this with our core ERP cloud. Excel Smartview capability provides users with an easy user interface for doing their day to …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We used to use Prophix before we switched over to Oracle EPM Cloud. In general, Oracle EPM Cloud and Prophix have similar feature offerings, but Oracle EPM takes advantage of the current major leading technologies. We chose EPM Cloud since we needed to access the Cloud through …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream XF and .NET
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It pretty much stands shoulder to shoulder with other businesses offering the same service.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM Cloud is much more user-friendly when compared to Prophix. Oracle's Smart View, compared to Prophix Excel plug-ins, is a lot more flexible.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We haven't evaludated any other products in planing area.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM has better service provided by tech support. Training is much better than others we compared.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
None at this time.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle was far better than any other products we looked at.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We selected it because it is efficient in almost 98 percent of our organizational needs.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We have not evaluated other products.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
The interactions with other cubes needs to be improved. Availability of more cubes and cell limits would improve functionality in Oracle EPM - EPBCS
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream is a very young product and young company, however, it offers a singular platform for both budgeting and consolidation. In addition, Onestream is not built on Essbase (a product that is rather old) and therefore has more dynamic capabilities. OneStream does not, …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Access did not seem user-friendly and did not have the security we required. Oracle Planning has robust security and is easy to get used to and use.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
API for custom integration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pricing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
Ratings
31% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
12% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
Ratings
25% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
5% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
  • Our implementation consultant set up all the business rules for calculations to get us live, and we may have difficulty setting up new ones going forward. We feel like that we now need to hire someone who has the technical knowledge to help us to manage the system going forward.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
The biggest key is data validation time. If you are implementing a new chart of accounts along with Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud, you need to multiply the time you think you can perform data validation by 2. The key to managing your project timeline is managing your expectations around data validation as well. For instance, it is recommended you convert 1-3 years vs. 5 years.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really appreciate. Cost is a little high and maintenance is a bit heaver than other tools so that is something to consider. The product keeps improving!
Read full review
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment