Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. PointNXT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
PointNXT
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
PointNXT is a cloud-based SaaS platform providing a unified multi-channel retail solution. With PointNXT, eCommerce sellers can manage their entire eCommerce operation from a single platform, to streamline processes and enhance the customer experience. The product offers a range of features, including inventory management, order management and reporting, integration with popular e-commerce platforms and marketplaces, shipping API integration, ONDC Seller App services, a shipping cost calculator,…
$4
Per Order
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
INR 4/Order
Per Order
Enterprise
Negotiable
For Enterprises with more than 10,000 orders per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Selected because of Intercompany workflow, consolidated reporting functionality, system controls, available modules for fixed assets and inventory. GP was the best value for the points mentioned.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Does not stack up against SAP as it does not have the level of flexibility offered by SAP. JD Edwards software was awful, no comparison.
PointNXT

No answer on this topic

Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
API for custom integration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
PointNXT
-
Ratings
Pricing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Webgility
Webgility
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPPointNXT
Likelihood to Recommend
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

PointNXT Screenshots

Screenshot of PointNXT DashboardScreenshot of PointNXT Inventory Management TabScreenshot of PointNXT Order Management Tab