Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Sparkrock
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Sparkrock’s cloud-enabled solution helps organizations manage their finance and accounting, human resources and payroll, human services case management, and donor and fundraising activities. According to the vendor, key benefits and features include: Finance Management with capabilities to help organizations increase transparency and reduce risk. Workforce Management to help front-line employees deliver services to clients, with tools that help them to be…
We came from a product that was specific to our industry. It was old, tired and did not do many of the things the Altus Dynamics solution does. The only other product that we seriously considered was Microsoft Dynamics GP, however our finance team felt that product was too …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Sparkrock
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
17 Ratings
16% below category average
Sparkrock
9.4
3 Ratings
27% above category average
Pay calculation
6.016 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.012 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.016 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
9% below category average
Sparkrock
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration
7.024 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Plug-ins
7.019 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
36 Ratings
25% below category average
Sparkrock
9.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability
6.029 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.036 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
37 Ratings
16% below category average
Sparkrock
9.0
4 Ratings
22% above category average
Dashboards
7.025 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Standard reports
7.035 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Custom reports
6.035 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
44 Ratings
15% below category average
Sparkrock
8.8
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Accounts payable
6.041 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.032 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Cash management
6.032 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
6.037 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
7.027 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
7.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
6.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
7.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.018 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
8.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.022 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
6.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.014 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
6.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.015 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
24 Ratings
8% below category average
Sparkrock
9.3
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking
7.022 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.012 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Location management
8.017 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manufacturing module
6.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
22 Ratings
14% below category average
Sparkrock
-
Ratings
Pricing
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
7.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.6
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.4
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.3
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.6
1 Ratings
32% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
For all companies that want to improve the performance of their employees and increase productivity, this software helps all daily business tasks to be executed on time efficiently and smoothly. A very useful program that's why we don't stop using it.
Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Many of the improvements are being met with each upgrade. Altus Dynamics has an idea portal that customers can add ideas to and vote on other customer ideas. This means that most issues that come up are resolved with each new upgrade.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Complete workflow management to keep up to date and orderly the daily activities of employees. Allows for seamless cash flow, invoicing, general ledger, payroll, and inventory.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
As a technician it's hard for me to say what effect the ROI has had on our organization, however our finance team seems satisfied on it. We look forward to deploying the staff dashboards for better financial tracking throughout our whole organization.