Microsoft Entra ID vs. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Entra ID
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Microsoft Azure Active Directory or Azure AD) is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution supporting restricted access to applications with Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) built-in, single sign-on (SSO), B2B collaboration controls, self-service password, and integration with Microsoft productivity and cloud storage (Office 365, OneDrive, etc) as well as 3rd party services.
$6
per user/per month
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SailPoint Identity Security for the cloud enterprise manages risk from the explosion of technology access. The solution gives businesses visibility while automating and accelerating the management of all user identities, entitlements, systems, data and cloud services.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Editions & Modules
Premium P1
$6.00
per user/per month
Premium P2
$9.00
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Entra ID
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
No, I think we use most of the Microsoft 365 application.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Okta One. Log on. Hint, this was the best because we're mainly a Microsoft shop.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Google Workspace is really pretty much the only other primary competitor. And again, Microsoft has just been the standard for so many years and it was in place at the organization when I was first brought on at the beginning of my tenure. And so it didn't seem logical to switch …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
More people are already using it, so makes sense of using this one.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Yeah, so basically that product to be honest, was more of a getting comfortable with cloud identification management. So that was a product I used. It has all the policies for desktops and doing updates and all that central directory identity provisioning stuff for users. Users …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
I haven't evaluated other products like this.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We use DUO as another IDP solution and we also evaluated Okta as a solution. We didn't have a choice to be honest, because Microsoft products, you can't get away with it, but it's built in and a bunch of other providers have it as authentication, so it's great.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We've used other Microsoft products and we've also used some standalone products, like each application you can have its own identity, so we've looked at some of those too, but we try to use the Entra ID as much as possible because it offers a wider range of reliability.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Google Directory. We've evaluated Okta as well for SO. Those are the two. I mean, we selected this one because we want it to be a Microsoft shop.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We actually did just the Microsoft Active directory, so we picked the actual. We did just pure active directory. I mean the open LDAP stuff, but it didn't quite work that well.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
I think the closest one would be because we recently went through an implementation, but Salesforce has their own version of a signal sign-on product. It's not the same. I'd say that it works, but it doesn't give you as much functionality.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
I use some part of AWS IM also, but not purely Microsoft brand. I use AWS for a very short period of time.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
For us, it was a natural evolution of our use of active directory. As we went from on-premises to the cloud, this was an easy extension of our authentication infrastructure. We looked at other products from Oracle, so Oracle ID, Oracle Identity Management. We looked at pink …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
The use the flexibility and the easiness of it. We don't need any maintenance or management cost on top of it.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We used Google before, but we tried to use it but it didn't. We didn't like it. I'll this is better. It integrates better with our environment that we have right now.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We're Microsoft dedicated. We do however, displace other products that do similar things, so a lot of third party products, so even like Okta. In my opinion, it's just equally as powerful or more powerful of a product and it has a way better price point for customers. I think …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
I'd love to tell you about Amazon IM and Google's IM because they suck and they tell you to use Entra ID, factually. They're like, oh cool, set it up with Entra ID. They just know you're going to do it. I don't think you guys have a competitor, to be honest. You just don't.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
We're a Microsoft Native shop, so we're looking at Okta's identity tool, SailPoint and a few other competitors of Venture id. And we decided to go with this one because we're already using Active Directory, so just using the native Microsoft Suites kind of just they integrate …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Well, it's natively integrated with all Microsoft Stack, so it comes very handy when you need to, for example, use it for Intune Association, et cetera, so it's very handy.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Previously we had worked with Okta, which was kind of using our replacement for active directory server, and I know that has integrations, but we ended up just going with Entra ID just for the ease of access and without having to stack on an additional third party application …
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
In our application use case, it's kind of unique and there isn't any like for if there's anything on the identity space, probably Okta. Yeah. But we do both use them and we have integration with Okta and Entra ID, so it works for us very well.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
I would say primarily SAVI and SalePoint. I would say that Microsoft has the best opportunity to scale for all market, but not quite there yet.
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
License and some capabilities are better in Microsoft Entra ID
Chose Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Login ID was chosen for its ease of use and availability of access via any device. Unlike the old Active Directory, it has a low learning curve and is very intuitive for analysts who are using it for the first time.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
The customer was already using SailPoint Access Risk Management (ERP Maestro) and doesn't want to bring in SAP AC for the SOD topic. So it was easy to decide to go with SailPoint Access Risk Management (ERP Maestro).
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint is a more customizable solution than Okta, it is also not just a cloud application. Our use of IIQ to manage external suppliers via Azure AD guest accounts was not available on other platforms at the point of deployment. The integration with SAP and other Microsoft …
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
The on-prem SailPoint IdentityIQ platform provides the necessary customization that is required in our dynamic environment. Although we may look at a cloud-based Identity Management service again in the future, (there are many advantages), our identity management, …
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint and Oracle were selected for the RFP from a field of over 10 companies. SailPoint was much more mature and stable during our evaluation in 2015 and continues to lead the pack. We're confident we made the correct decision and work closely with our success team at …
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint is more capable, more simple, more robust, relativly more easy upgrade processes, more easy coding and deployment processes.
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Microsoft Azure Active Directory and The Okta Identity Cloud
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
I think SailPoint Identity Platform stacks better than most IAM tools and solution though a lot of SaaS IAM solutions are already available, can compete and are at par with its features and capabilities.
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
IdentityIQ provides a more complete solution for a fraction of the cost of other solution providers. It is easy to work with and provided very effective management of all aspects of the access management process.
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
All these products are really good at some key areas. They are all different and solve different parts of the puzzle. IIQ is more of a centric focal point that manages and maintains access in a vendor-agnostic way. It helps bridge the gap at the identity layer for different …
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Support was better with IdentityIQ than with Oracle. Also, it was cheaper and did more.
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
IIQ can do much more. And it's highly configurable, so it can more easily be adapted for related uses.
Chose SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Compared to other solutions, IdentityIQ provides the best identity governance for your organization. Custom workflows and automation processes make this product more attractive to business rather than its competitors. IdentityIQ is a united, user-friendly platform to perform …
Features
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Entra ID
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
ID-Management Access Control8.90 Ratings7.70 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.20 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Password Management8.80 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.90 Ratings7.70 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation7.50 Ratings7.80 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.10 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.7
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Entra IDSailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
For one, a significant factor for us is that it is integrated with HelloID, which gives us, as the IT department, a lot of time back because we don’t need to create user accounts manually. It is great for the roles we have defined, as they can be used repeatedly. A great feature is that guest accounts can be created for external users; we only need to be in a closed area of your domain.
Read full review
We are happy with the management of the Id, accounts where the user can request any access easily. Also the many connector which Sailpoint is offering in order to onboard lots of applications is quite helpful. The access review module has also have been improve so that large campaigns can we work out easily.

Where we see some improvement is on the UI as here it is not so intuitive for the end user, so that we need to make lots of communications and training so that the user is able to understand how to use it.

For the administration and creation of roles it also would be great to have some improvements here to make it more easily its management.
Read full review
Pros
  • It addresses the issue of identity management very well with respect to putting in that multi authentication.
  • It can also support with respect to we can push these policies into another product that is not Microsoft, but it needs that SSO so we can have one account going into multi different accounts. I think that's the biggest pros and the easy use of Microsoft 365 also is one of those pros also in terms of administration.
Read full review
  • The access request work flow and back end process is exceptional. It effectively manages all of the various pieces of a request and presents the completed request to the provisioning agent as a single record. This is very helpful to the efficiency of the process since the provisioning agent only sees the completed request rather than seeing each component as it is approved. Other systems deliver the various request components to provisioning as they are approved but cannot be provisioned without all the components. Thus creating complexity for the provisioning agent and impacting the SLAs with what looks like a delay with the provisioning process.
  • The system is robust enough to effectively handle the scale that we need. With 750+ applications, 24,304 individual entitlements to select from, and an average of 10,200 request transactions per month. We have never had any performance issues.
  • The system flexible enough to accommodate our complex business needs without needing to customize the base system. We have been able to add significant functionality to the system in order to support the business needs by extending the code rather than altering the base code. This has enabled a simple upgrade of the system without having to re-apply code enhancements.
Read full review
Cons
  • Well, I'm an active ad admin, so there's a lot of features in active directory that Entra ID seems to be just adding now. We're kind of figuring out that the policies are different than Entra ID that they were in active directory and we're finding other products to do that, like Azure policy. Some things I'm used to seeing in identity products or like active directory aren't in Entra iID, but are doing good job of managing stuff that it does so far.
Read full review
  • Technical adoption requires a high level of training and experience by the implementing teams.
  • SailPoint and partners offers very good training courses which I think are very good. An area of improvement can be in providing cloud VMs that users can work with to learn the IIQ tool more effectively at their own pace.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Entra ID is a vital part of our Identity management/administration. With the integrations it has to other Microsoft products, setup and configuration is a breeze. Additionally, Microsoft has been around a long time and have the resources to ensure this product is stable and secure for many years to come. We know it will evolve with time to provide us what we need as technology changes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Very easily usable. It could be easier to use. Implementation was kind of tricky. We do run a hybrid environment, so we're syncing a local active directory instance with Entra ID, so that could be a little tricky. But outside of that, if you're not running a hybrid deployment or a version of Entra ID usually, it's pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Overall usablity is excellent. The product is capable of performing all the expected tasks for a IAM solution.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
There has been a handful of outages but they have been either minimal or rarely severe
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
I could probably rate this a 10 but I'm always conservative on giving out perfect scored bt performance has not been a problem for us using Entra ID.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft has offered Azure Active Directory as a solution for a couple of decades now, so they have seen and anticipated almost any issue that an organization may face and can therefore help. The cloud offering of Azure Active Directory offers some additional "self healing" or monitoring services that can minimize the need for a service call. However, as with most large companies supporting a fast growing market, there may be some gaps in service knowledge (and particularly processing) from the front line / tier one staff as they follow a corporate script at first contact.
Read full review
Support for Customizations is very limited.
Read full review
Online Training
Most training was internally produced
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Make sure you use a good partner. Our implementation was a bit longer and more problematic than we expected. Our partner got it done, but, in my opinion, some of their inexperience and staffing issues were evident.
Read full review
Implementation was done correctly and all the requirements were met.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft Entra ID is not as stand-alone product as competitors like Okta. It may lack some of the features that competing products have but on the other hand it integrates both technically and license wise with other Microsoft cloud services and is easy to deploy. It is also the easiest way to extend identity management to the cloud if you already have Microsoft Active Directory in use.
Read full review
SailPoint is a more customizable solution than Okta, it is also not just a cloud application. Our use of IIQ to manage external suppliers via Azure AD guest accounts was not available on other platforms at the point of deployment. The integration with SAP and other Microsoft services is also second to none.
Read full review
Scalability
Scalability is pretty trival for Entra ID. It's not difficult to manage a few or many accounts.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • I don't know if I can really quantify that. It's one of those products that just exists and so there's not a whole lot of changes that we need to make with the product. And so I guess in terms of value, what we get is we don't have to worry about the identity management piece. We know that that's taken care of.
Read full review
  • The ability to automate the employee onboarding processes greatly reduces the staffing requirements for account creation and access assignment
  • The self-service capabilities for the account registration and password management tasks have greatly reduced the number of calls to our Help Desk
  • The role mining capabilities have reduced the amount of time required to assign and update our user application set mapping
Read full review
ScreenShots