Microsoft Project Server vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Project Server
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Project Server is a project portfolio management option.N/A
Oracle Primavera
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle’s Primavera is a software suite designed for construction and other asset-intensive industries. It contains a variety of project planning, management, and execution components for buyers to select from.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Project Server
Chose Microsoft Project Server
I have used Basecamp which I recommend for all! This is one of my top tools for not only company projects however for projects, meetings, communication outside of work. We use Basecamp for our membership organization's dental meetings in other states to communicate events, chat …
Chose Microsoft Project Server
We tried few years ago to use Basecamp for our project management. Even though Basecamp is a much more easier to use tool with nice visualization and graphics, it didn't work out because the project managers are more use to the Excel way of doing things, which Project …
Chose Microsoft Project Server

I was not involved in the process of selecting Microsoft Project Server, and this is the only product I have used.

However, the multiplatform integration I think is what makes it so valuable. The access to such a wide variety of products from Microsoft that all work well …

Chose Microsoft Project Server
One of the key advantages of Microsoft Project Server (MSPS) is its ecosystem. It gels very well with SharePoint, Office, Office 365. The support from Microsoft is also a key driver and they are very experienced and many ways to resolve issues. Also, Microsoft has bridged the …
Chose Microsoft Project Server
Project Online seems to be more suited for agile project management as well as easier to customize (Views, Custom Fields, PDPs, Portfolios and reporting)
Oracle Primavera
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle Primavera is more easy and integrated with other systems
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full …
Chose Oracle Primavera
We use Oracle ERP and are happy with it. We have long-standing relationship with Oracle and our workforce is well versed with it. We wanted a high-end scalable software for construction projects and Primavera fits the bill. Payment systems like Textura can be easily integrated …
Chose Oracle Primavera
Oracle Primavera is better and faster than the other solutions available. Especially with large data sets.
Chose Oracle Primavera
I have also used Microsoft Project in the past to do scheduling. While easier to use than Primavera, it does not have the same capabilities to determine CPM. Furthermore, it would not be appropriate for larger sized projects.
Chose Oracle Primavera
I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there …
Chose Oracle Primavera
When compared to the likes of the field, Oracle is the least friendly in regards to being accessible to the team with Smartsheet working the most favorably in that aspect. Otherwise, Oracle's PM program is more intuitive than Microsoft Project, has more features when compared …
Chose Oracle Primavera
I found Oracle Primavera better compared to Clarity as it offers better navigation. The reporting feature is also better in Primavera. The views provided by Primavera are far better compared to Clarity.
Chose Oracle Primavera
Primavera allows several users to work in a single file at the same time. This allows the team to develop and update the project schedule for reporting much faster. Also, the user can see updates that effect logically link activities in the future easily. MS Project does not.
Chose Oracle Primavera
P6 is the most robust scheduling software I've used. It's the best solution for large-scale projects.
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Small Businesses
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Project ServerOracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
You will be able to do the project management (scheduling, tasks assignment, resources allocation, cost tracking) for all your projects in one place, where the team members can contribute and keep the plans up to date. The web version does the main job right but if you find it more difficult to use you just use the standalone Microsoft Project and upload the changes back to the server.
Read full review
This program is well suited for online database management for construction-related fields and their contract management. It has many features which allow for reporting, issuance of changes, applications for payment and HB, and related construction-related documentation for both client and user. It also allows one to print and review in PDF any required documentation needed as per contracts.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to update project plans on the move in any location. Plans can even be updated offline and saved back to the server when the connection is reestablished.
  • Visibility of resource assignments across the company allows us to plan project start dates easily and effectively.
  • Being a Microsoft product, it is intuitive to administer and easy to configure to our individual requirements.
Read full review
  • Critical Path Methodology will identify potential issues in on time completion if activities move.
  • A resources loaded schedule can accurately forecast % complete and staffing requirements.
  • Coding allows easy group, sort, and filtering when reporting to certain business units out of the same file.
Read full review
Cons
  • Resource loading and leveling extremely complicated within the tool
  • Software makes incorrect assumptions and changes without user knowledge
  • Inconsistencies within the tool make it hard to predict & troubleshoot
Read full review
  • The software is high end with rich features, hence its rich price.
  • There is room for improvement in their customer service.
  • Oracle is doing its best in coming up with new features, and has a planned roadmap. It would be good if the enhancements are delivered faster.
Read full review
Usability
We don't have to worry about maintenance, upgrades, or compatibility issues. All the capabilities we need are there, and are easily customizable.
Read full review
Is easy to use but the the interface should be more nice and contemporary
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Per Microsoft, Project Online provides more value long-term by reducing infrastructure cost and increase feature release cycle time
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have used Basecamp which I recommend for all! This is one of my top tools for not only company projects however for projects, meetings, communication outside of work. We use Basecamp for our membership organization's dental meetings in other states to communicate events, chat with participants, send donation requests and organize events on the platform. There really is no learning curve, it's super user friendly, you don't need any experience prior and it's cost effective.
Read full review
I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there are newer, perhaps better products available. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management does still manage to get the job done, but its time in the sun is fading.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Better project management and schedule tracking which in turn improved employee's efficiency.
  • Licensing aspect is complex. Issues with onboarding new users to system from licensing perspective.
  • Positively, financial review process can be tailor-made which may not require further customization of the tool.
Read full review
  • P6 has had measurable ROI in the fact that projects can be completed on schedule or sooner using it.
  • P6 it presents data date stamps, which are used to share with clients during the project for the progress of the schedule.
  • P6 may have a high level of entry to use for the smaller project, which can be a hindrance to use.
Read full review
ScreenShots