TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Project vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Project

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Project is a project management software. It provides core PM functionality, including agile workflow support and resource management. Project can be deployed in the cloud or on-premise.

    $120

    per year per user

    Planview AdaptiveWork

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/APlanview AdaptiveWork is a web-based collaborative work management software. Planview AdaptiveWork enables users to connect employees and partners and create documents, reports and specialized workflow automation. Planview AdaptiveWork is designed to work across multiple teams to enable cross-company task, project, and resource management.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft ProjectPlanview AdaptiveWork
    Editions & Modules
    Project Server
    $0
    Planner Plan 1
    $10
    per month per user
    Planner and Project Plan 3
    $30
    per month per user
    Planner and Project Plan 5
    $55
    per month per user
    Project Standard 2024
    $679.99
    one-time fee per installation
    Project Professional 2024
    $1,129.99
    one-time fee per installation
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft ProjectPlanview AdaptiveWork
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsPlans are billed annually.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft ProjectPlanview AdaptiveWork
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Project
    Microsoft Projects is more widely used and integrates with our Microsoft Office 365 suite of products. Speaking with peers within the industry it appears Microsoft Projects is a better fit for telecoms companies. Resource and task management seem easier and more effective with …
    Incentivized
    Planview
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    Clarizen has a cleaner, easier-to-use UI than both Wrike and Microsoft Project in my opinion. Clarizen is overall pretty intuitive and you can use it on a daily basis to manage your projects without it taking up an exorbitant amount of time. Although I would say Wrike is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    MS Project could not come close to matching the time tracking and forecasting abilities of Clarizen.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    Clarizen is miles ahead of MS Project in terms of ease of use and connectivity. It also provides for changes to be made along with dependencies in a much simpler fashion.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    This is more of a collaborative tool out of the box, where as Microsoft Project can also be customized to be more collaborative, but the out of box features for collaboration stand out.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    It's about the same. It should be noted that Planview AdaptiveWork was not our first choice. We selected Planview PPM Pro & ProjectPlace based on capabilities and roadmap. There were roadmap items that were going to solve several business problems and allow us to leverage …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    I've always enjoyed working with AdaptiveWork. It's a customizable tool that is easy for the end user to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    Planview AdaptiveWork was the right size, at the right price point that fit our customization and integration flexibility. It is intuitive to use but allowed us to add complexity as our needs grew
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    We selected Adaptive Work for it's ease of configurability, advanced scheduling capabilities, and workflow capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    It stacks up well to many other products. It is lightweight and intuitive to use. However, if you are a heavy Project user, or are considering a Project at the enterprise level, this might not be as sophisticated/ heavyweight as those kinds of products. However, for all but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    Clarizen is easy to use, web based, and collaborative. It also does a great job organizing tasks across projects which is great for helping contributors get their work done on time. Management loves the reports they can create on overall status, costs, and when projects are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    TeamWorks: Good product but can't handle portfolios and doesn't provide resource management.
    Microsoft Project: Expensive. Steep learning curve.
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    The social capability and integrating the notifications to keep people on top of their tasks is a big sell. Being able to share Gantt charts with customers that expire so that they only have visibility to current status is very helpful. Also a baseline comparison so that you …
    Incentivized
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    It is much easier to use and provides more immediate visualization than MS-Project does. The learning curve with Clarizen is far shorter than MS-Project. It is also less costly than MS-Project.
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    MS Project suite and many more. Clarizen had the best tools for what we needed, and the Magic Quadrant report from Garnter confirmed it for us.
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    The IT-start up firm I was working in the end selected MS Project with Sharepoint and Office 365 over Clarizen since the Microsoft solution was easier to use, more flexible, and could handle a larger workload than Clarizen could.
    Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
    AtTask, EPM Live, CorasWorks

    There were many different reasons why we chose Clarizen but ease of use, functionality and price and adaptability were our top reasons.
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft ProjectPlanview AdaptiveWork
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Project and Planview AdaptiveWork
    Feature
    Microsoft Project
    9.1
    108 Ratings
    Planview AdaptiveWork
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management10.0107 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management10.0104 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts10.0104 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling10.0106 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation10.083 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration8.096 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology6.080 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology10.080 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management9.077 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration5.082 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access10.067 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking10.073 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management10.063 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management10.083 Ratings00 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Microsoft Project and Planview AdaptiveWork
    Feature
    Microsoft Project
    10.0
    77 Ratings
    Planview AdaptiveWork
    -
    Ratings
    Quotes/estimates10.054 Ratings00 Ratings
    Invoicing10.045 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting10.074 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.050 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Microsoft ProjectPlanview AdaptiveWork
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.7
    (108 ratings)
    7.4
    (78 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.5
    (26 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    7.3
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (34 ratings)
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.4
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)