Digital Guardian vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

When Digital Guardian works well, it really is fairly seamless. You may notice a tiny bit of additional lag on some programs, but for the most part, when it functions properly, it's fairly unobtrusive. Therein lies the rub...when it functions properly. We had frequent program conflicts with Digital Guardian. We had one issue that caused Digital Guardian to completely cripple Microsoft Outlook, and similarly cripple Microsoft Excel. It took Digital Guardian weeks to even release any kind of fix for the issue, and the first several fixes did not, in fact, resolve the issue. We ended up having to completely remove it from our environment and are still waiting for a confirmed more stable version, as it simply caused far too much disruption to our user base, and also consumed an extremely large amount of time from our admins dealing with user issues related to these problems.

Incentivized

I would highly recommend Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for companies that are utilizing Microsoft technologies based on the strong integrations. If a company is using other technologies (e.g Google Workspace), then Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would not be a good fit and would be difficult to implement/manage.

Incentivized

• Email data leaks - DLP software must prevent certain actions to work well. Let's say you try to copy and paste an SS # to an email, or upload sensitive data to your personal email account. Guardian Edge can prevent that, and then alert administrators that it happened
• Unauthorized file copies - Guardian Edge can also prevent users from copying files from a sensitive restricted area to somewhere else where they might be able to more easily exfiltrate it. A good example would be from a company file share to a less secure server or their own home drive
• Alerting Administrators of suspicious activities - Any time a user uploads a file to an upload service or personal email, it is logged and reported as an event to be reviewed. If it found nothing in scanning the data, it will still notify you that it happened so you can review it yourself to confirm it wasn't a false negative.

Incentivized

• It's a great product from an information protection perspective, as it can identify different types of data across tons of different locations.
• It's great at applying standard regulatory frameworks, like HIPAA, to management actions so you can work towards being as compliant as possible.
• The eDiscovery tools are very helpful when it comes to managing legal holds and discovery requests, as it's simple to freeze accounts or hold at points in time for discovery.

Incentivized

• Digital Guardian is perfect in database protection, hence, no complaint.
• Digital Guardian makes the detection process effective, hence, reliable.
• Finally, Digital Guardian is cloud focused or delivered, hence, concrete and efficient.

Incentivized

• Advanced or specific policies have a high learning curve.
• We have to rely on our reseller partner to implement some of the policies that we were looking for.
• Microsoft is constantly trying to upsell the PureView suite and hides some features included in E5 Enterprise to try and upsell.

Incentivized

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is super difficult.

Incentivized

Digital Guardian consists of an elite team of professionals, who easily [identify] any threat and the possibility of cyberattacks. Further, Digital Guardian has the ability to prioritize the handling of the database, based on the risk that each carries. Finally, Digital Guardian has [an] attack sequence that is detailed, progressive, and sustainable.

Incentivized

Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual functionality of DLP, there are other requirements that they just don't have the features for yet.

Incentivized

• The professional threat detectors and cyber security analysts [increase] the reliability of the company database.
• Cloud coverage allows easy deployment and efficient systematic controls.
• Lastly, Digital Guardian [values] and monitors the procedures or the roles that every player makes in the company.

Incentivized

• I think it's integral to everything, it has to be positive and the positivity has to be the ability to use Purview in a situation for an organization. For us as a provider, we're not sure if we need your services or we think we're doing this thing correctly. We also evaluate compliance team. So first thing that we may do is if we don't have a footprint in the organization and we don't know what their data parameter or their data flow capabilities are, if we don't think that they're controlling it confidently, we validate and verify. We may do a content search and that content search immediately will be the most revealing thing. They'll be like, "alright, so right here on this diagram, this and this area are the areas that you have protected that are capable of protecting CUI. How come your CUIs in all of these 18 other different areas in which you see as like scope creep happens because the enforcement mechanisms haven't been tested, validated or whatever, or haven't been effective." It allows us to do quick cleanup, quick discovery, and things like that for new onboarding clients.

Incentivized