| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Microsoft Teams | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat. | $4.80 per month per user |
 Planview ProjectPlace | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Projectplace is a collaborative work management solution. The vendor says the product is built with teams of all sizes and complexity in mind, from virtual teams of five to entire global enterprises with tens of thousands of active users. It is also designed to incorporate waterfall and agile workflows. | N/A |
| Microsoft Teams | Planview ProjectPlace | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discounts are available for non profit organizations. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Teams | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | Chose Planview ProjectPlace Planview's best feature above all the project planning products is its ability to work in all the methodologies. Scheduling is also a cakewalk when it comes to PV and personally I have found it to be more easier when compared to MS Project or HP PPM. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Planview ProjectPlace SharePoint seems to be a bit more userfriendly and more organizationally driven in comparison to project place. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Teams | Planview ProjectPlace | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communication |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Teams | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 3.7 | 9.2 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Availability | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Performance | 8.0 | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 6.3 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.1 |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Professional Services | 7.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 6.4 |
