| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite empowers teams to ideate, plan, design, build, and launch game-changing solutions from a shared infinite canvas. | $0 per month |
 Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
| Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite | Miro | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite More secure compared to Miro and more flexible / creative compared to Microsoft Visio. Overall, prefer Miro to all of them! Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite These are just different and don't do what Lucidchart does specifically. Miro was a good alternative and I like how it enabled collaboration. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite If it's solo work, I prefer Lucidchart over all its competitors. For larger group collaboration, Lucidspark or Miro is much much preferred than Lucidchart. Figma is ok for some basic use but can't handle complex stuffs. MURAL and Visio are just terrible products to use in … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite We started using LucidChart after switching from another visual collaboration tool. The import process worked surprisingly well - way better than anyone on our team was expecting. Lucidchart itself is simple to use, easy to collaborate with coworkers, has a ton of built-in … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite I think Lucidchart is just better for diagramming complex engineer scenarios. For software engineers, it's really hard to beat. I do like these other tools I have listed, but my favorite is still Lucidchart because it has so many high-quality features that really matter for … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite I think that among other diagramming tools, Lucidchart is one of the most complete and advanced. For its expertise in diagrams, it offers a wide range of options when it comes to making any kind of diagram because, unlike its competitors that have multiple uses, they do not … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Miro To be honest, I haven't checked out lucidchart and its similar products in a while. They've probably caught up at this point, so maybe I should. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro FigJams integration with Figma UXUI and prototyping is pretty good but as a standalone collaboration tool, it isn't Miro. lucidchart just felt 'clunky' and not as intuitive and 'precise' as Miro. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is easier to use and the UI is much better. Therefore, it was a clear winner and that is why it remains and the go to choice in the industry. We value it for how it allows us to store information and enhances collaboration amongst team mates and different teams. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro We use a lot of products, each have their advantage. Miro has the best templates and also provides the best training. Lucid has some better data centre hosting location options and also account management team is very good. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro We use both in our business. While lucid's process mapping cuntionality is better than Miro's, i find that Miro is more intuititve and user friendly to use and has a better overall UX. The templates in Miro are also better in my opinion than the ones that can be found in Lucid. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro this is the enterprise tool- i prefer miro Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is one of the easiest to use, primarily because of the wide adoption of keyboard shortcuts. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.8 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 7.9 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.8 |
