MongoDB vs. SingleStore

MongoDB

437 Reviews and Ratings

SingleStore

110 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
MongoDB	Score8.5 out of 10	N/A	MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.	$0.10 million reads
SingleStore	Score7.5 out of 10	N/A	SingleStore aims to enable organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads in one unified platform.	$0.69 per hour

Pricing

MongoDB

SingleStore

Shared: $0
per month
Serverless: $0.10million reads
million reads
Dedicated: $57
per month

OnDemand: $0.69
per hour

Pricing Offerings
MongoDB	SingleStore
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

Optional

Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	MongoDB	SingleStore
Considered Both Products	MongoDB No answer on this topic	SingleStore Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore outperforms Snowflake in real-time analytics and transactional workloads but lags in large-scale batch processing. Compared to MongoDB Atlas, SingleStore excels in complex SQL queries and joins, while MongoDB handles unstructured, document-based data better. Its … Incentivized Helpful? Jon Milsom Co-Founder & CTO in Engineering at PitcheroGPS (Sports, 11-50 employees) Chose SingleStore We knew early on that MySQL (Amazon Aurora) would not be suitable for this workload as it cannot query our time series data as fast as SingleStore. We also use MongoDB Atlas for another application but we could not achieve the raw speed we saw from SingleStore. Our technical … Incentivized Helpful? Pierre Bazoge CTO (Chief Technical Officer) in Engineering at Rimdian (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose SingleStore SingleStore outperformed both MongoDB and PostgreSQL for OLAP workloads. Its ability to shard data and handle parallel processing of SQL "JOIN" queries across shards is a game changer. Incentivized Helpful? Santhosh Yamsani Senior Database Engineer in Engineering at Innovent Project (E-Learning, 10,001+ employees) Chose SingleStore Admin efforts are much less when compared to MongoDB Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore provides a solution for working with larger amount of data (vs. MySQL) with better performance (vs. BigQuery) without having to preprocess the data (vs. MongoDB), so basically it does better for specific use cases. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore (memsql) out performs based on our analysis with sample data sets within org. We could see limitations with other products which SingleStore can overcall like scaling with data while performing with similar SLA. It also has the advantage of row store and column … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore Greenplum is good in handling very large amount of data. Concurrency in Greenplum was a major problem. Features available in SingleStore like Pipelines and in memory features are not available in Greenplum. Gemfire was not scaling well like SingleStore. Support of both … Incentivized Helpful? Rex Elardo Data scientist in Information Technology at Upwork (Information Technology & Services, 1-10 employees) Chose SingleStore SingleStore is simply easier to use and most importantly much, much faster. For Big Data, it is an absolute life saver :) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore We selected SingleStore due to its multi cloud nature, SQL compatibility and customer references who operate similar applications as us Incentivized Helpful? Armen Martirosyan Database Administrator in Information Technology at Schoolcraft (Education Management, 51-200 employees) Chose SingleStore It seems that SingleStore is good at being able to handle complex queries against large datasets out of the box. In the past, we've had to do quite a bit of manual configuration and database performance tuning, but SingleStore (so far) has seemed to require minimal … Incentivized Helpful? Diego Montúfar CEO in Corporate at handytec (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose SingleStore It does the same but in the same platform. [SingleStore (formerly MemSQL)] can replace most of the use cases those other technologies solve. Incentivized Helpful? Jacob Ortega Chief Technology Officer in Information Technology at albo (Financial Services, 201-500 employees) Chose SingleStore I guess the main difference is how the memory is used for stacking and storing data until it reaches the final destination, the performance is awesome compared with others and when you have a real time business with a certain complexity. The development team would be more … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

MongoDB

SingleStore

Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of MongoDB and SingleStore
Feature	MongoDB 10.0 39 Ratings	SingleStore - Ratings
Performance	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Availability	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Concurrency	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Security	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Scalability	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Data model flexibility	10.039 Ratings	00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	10.038 Ratings	00 Ratings

User Ratings
	MongoDB	SingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (79 ratings)	7.6 (70 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (67 ratings)	8.2 (5 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (15 ratings)	8.2 (8 ratings)
Availability	9.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (2 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (44 ratings)
Support Rating	9.6 (13 ratings)	8.4 (9 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.4 (2 ratings)	7.3 (2 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (2 ratings)