Monster.com

Monster.com

105 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Monster	Score8.5 out of 10	N/A	Monster in Weston offers their job board for finding the right candidates, boasting resume analysis and role fit scoring, available at Monster.com.	N/A

Pricing

Monster

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Monster
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Monster
Considered Both Products	Monster Verified User Chose Monster Monster.com is very excellent for professionals who are in need of candidate database with effective cost. The customer service is very good in term of explaining new features and accepting user reviews. Even though it is cost effective it doesn't fail to meet the user needs. I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster Monster.com Vs. Dice.com Vs. Indeed.com Vs. Naukri.com Vs. LinkedIn.com Monster has a larger database than Dice Monster and has a broader reach across all sectors not related to tech. With Monster, we can attract more active candidates than passive ones that LinkedIn uses. … Incentivized Helpful? Najmus Saqib Technical Recruiter in Human Resources at Aptask (Staffing & Recruiting, 201-500 employees) Chose Monster I selected Monster.com over Dice.com because of its wide filter criteria. Also, Monster.com reached wide range of talent as compared to Dice.com Incentivized Helpful? Dustin Nguyen Associate in Professional Services at IQTalent Partners (Staffing & Recruiting, 201-500 employees) Chose Monster I think Monster.com fills a different niche. SeekOut/LinkedIn are more about finding candidates from the overall pool of millions of profiles and resumes. Monster.com shows you immediately who is looking, who is applying, etc. Monster.com also has the salary tools, which I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster I started using Monster.com in my initial days of recruiting and the UI of Monster.com is much interactive and user friendly. While using CareerBuilder.com I faced many issues while sorting profiles location-wise and keyword-wise so there is no comparison between Monster.com … Incentivized Helpful? Shubhanshu Mishra Account Executive in Information Technology at Tekfortune Inc (51-200 employees) Chose Monster Attracts candidates. Matches candidates to positions. Weeds out unqualified candidates. Easy to use.Advertising for open positions. Doesn't force you to change your password every other month or so. Very logical layout of the website. The search strings are very accurate. If … Incentivized Helpful? Sam Jain Talent Acquisition Specialist in Human Resources at Cynet Systems Inc (Pharmaceuticals, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Monster I selected Monster.com for the complete package and very useful database. Find monster.com very easy to use, track the activity of the recruiter as well as of the candidate. Checking inventory remaining is very easy to find in Monster.com. The is the best database to get the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster We use Indeed quite often as we are able to post positions for free however, we do not always get a quality candidate like we can from Monster.com Incentivized Helpful? Arnie Gerstein Resource Operations Director in Human Resources at Johnson Technologies Services Inc. (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Monster Monster rounds our our resources to be able to deliver quality candidates for internal and our govnerment clients needs! It's a great commpliment, each tool has it's advantage! Especially easy interface with our ATS and reporting capabilitles. Incentivized Helpful? Nina Trabskiy HR Generalist in Human Resources at ZOLLER INC. (Machinery, 51-200 employees) Chose Monster We evaluated two more job boards. One of them was free of charge and it is much harder to manage meaning the layout of software is not easy. The other service that we used, we barely got applicants at all. What was not helpful for us, is that in Monster.com we didn't find a way … Incentivized Helpful? Art Stiefel VP, Digital Strategy in Marketing at 20nine (Marketing & Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Monster We have used Indeed.com and LinkedIn Jobs as well as Monster.com for posting open positions online. Monster.com was consistent in the quality of applicants that they delivered to us. The other online job boards are okay with the applicants they provide but we have found that … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster The powerful feature that Monster has is its Boolean search, which is incredible. The resumes that pop up are the ones that are not able to be found on any other job boards. The Power Resume Search feature is the pro here. When it comes to Dice, the filters help us find the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster Indeed - You cannot do active sourcing on this. It is only passive recruiting in which you need to wait for the candidate to get back to you. Also the number of candidates that you can approach is limited. With Monster you can do active hiring and there is no limit to which you … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Monster It is the least effective tool we use. It's steadily declined in relevance in the marketplace which means that not only do less candidates know about Monster, but also fewer employers known about the platform. I think Indeed has largely taken over Monster's position in the … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

Monster

Comparison of Recruitment Marketing features of Monster.com
Feature	Monster.com 9.0 2 Ratings
Passive Recruitment Advertising	9.02 Ratings
Active Recruitment Advertising	9.02 Ratings
Employer Branding Tools	9.02 Ratings

User Ratings
	Monster
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (13 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	9.2 (3 ratings)