Mood Platform vs. SAP PowerDesigner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mood Platform
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Mood Platform, from Mood International headquartered in the UK, is an enterprise architecture modeling tool.N/A
SAP PowerDesigner
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP PowerDesigner (formerly from Sybase) is an enterprise data architecture modeling tool, used to Build a blueprint of the current enterprise architecture and visualize the impact of change before it happens.N/A
Pricing
Mood PlatformSAP PowerDesigner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mood PlatformSAP PowerDesigner
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mood PlatformSAP PowerDesigner
User Ratings
Mood PlatformSAP PowerDesigner
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mood PlatformSAP PowerDesigner
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
SAP PowerDesigner allows our team of data modelers to work and collaborate from a single repository and single data dictionary. This helps enforce consistency as data elements are referenced in other objects. Prior to our use of PD, we might have an element named "ppt" in one table, "participant" in another table and "part" in a third table. By forcing everything to be used from the data dictionary, we avoid these situations because everyone has to go to the dictionary. And we are able to easily do peer reviews on models before they are released because we are collaborating through the use of the repository.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Impact Analysis
  • The domain structure helps you to handle different data types to unify.
  • Moving between from conceptual model to logical model and from logical model to physical model is so easy.
  • It also excels at implementation of database vendor-specific physical options.
  • The repository structure helps you to use in multi developer and architect based organizations by the check in and check out mechanism.
  • It also has a fully configurable naming convention implementation.
  • Coloring is simple with format copying and pasting option.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It took some time to figure out how to leverage the power of the repository. Some better examples in the documentation would have been helpful.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We did have to reach out to support to learn how to properly utilize the repository feature and share the data model across many developers. Support was able to help us get this set up correctly. The downside was it took us several weeks before we gave up and contacted support. We should have done that earlier. I would say, however, the documentation wasn't clear on how to do this. So support was a great big help!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The version of ErWin we had didn't support the repository for document sharing and data dictionary sharing. Our version of PD does so we were able to leverage that and have a central repository that is shared among the team members. That really helped to give us consistency across our databases. PD is easy to use, but getting the repository set up properly was a little tricky.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Standardization of models
  • Impact Analysis
  • Graphical User Interface
  • Ease of deployment
Read full review
ScreenShots