TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Anypoint Platform

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AThe Anypoint Platform developed by MuleSoft and acquired by Salesforce in early 2018 is designed to connect apps, data, and devices anywhere, on-premises or in the cloud. This platform was built to offer out-of-the-box connectors as well as tools that architects and developers can adopt quickly to design, build and manage the entire lifecycle of their APIs, applications, and products.N/A

    TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ATIBCO Integration is used to connect diverse business solutions, data sources, and devices into a single, seamless system.N/A
    Pricing
    Anypoint PlatformTIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Anypoint PlatformTIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Anypoint PlatformTIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Considered Both Products
    Salesforce
    Chose Anypoint Platform
    Anypoint has tons of capabilities baked in one platform, and other competitors like Built.io or Workato may not have all those like Anypoint Exchange. However where these products shine are in usability, as it's ridiculously easy to build integrations using Built.io. I was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anypoint Platform
    API led architecture focus with a decent API ecosystem for developer collaboration, policy management and declarative implementation. Batch processing, visualization, Anypoint MQ and ObjectStore leave a lot to be explored. Multiple deployment models make it worth considering.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anypoint Platform
    It enables customers to expose their APIs in a very simple and fast way. It can be used by non-expert developers. It is compliant with all major connection and data representation world standard.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anypoint Platform
    We provide options to customers to choose from the best tools. Customers are the decision makers. Personally, because of open-source and large community base, MuleSoft is the repo in the market.
    Incentivized
    TIBCO Software Inc.
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    TIBCO Cloud Integration is a comphrensive platform with good flexibility and scalability rather than selecting single products with predetermided licences and infrastructure
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    TIBCO Cloud Integration is relatively poor and underdeveloped. Requires a java developer to be able to use it competently.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Products like Jitterbit, Boomi and Anypoint are better at creating robust complex orchestrations.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Mulesoft is good for creating APIs.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    A lot of on-premises application integration scenarios:
    • Multiple hardware, software, distributed systems.
    • Peoplesoft, Oracle DB, SAP ERP, Sterling OMS, Oracle ATG E-commerce framework like those technologies in the program.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Having used Webmethods, Intellio and Mulesoft, I find TIBCO BusinessWorks more stable and easy to manage. TIBCO BusinessWorks Container Edition looks promising for cloud and containerized environments like any other new generation product.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Developing applications is easier in Tibco BusinessWorks than in any other tool.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    The community support and the stability of the software are the most important points. In banking business flows, security is also very important, so is it is better to use a proprietary software instead of an open-source solution like MuleSoft Anypoint and others.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    We did some pilot projects with TIBCO BusinessWorks and MuleSoft and the end result was that for us TIBCO was the better choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Mulesoft is yet to mature as a technology, but as an open source product, it does stack up against TIBCO BW in terms of license cost.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    As we are using TIBCO EMS as our JMS provider, it is, of course, better to use TIBCO BusinessWorks.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)

    TIBCO is lacking of a centralized placed where the users can upload their "API's", mulesoft is wining here.

    TIBCO is taking too much to time to get into the cloud solutions.

    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    We have evaluated SAP PI and Mulesoft and picked TIBCO BusinessWorks.
    Main reasons for selecting TIBCO Business Works are:
    1. Developer Friendly Process Design and Development
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    I like BusinessWorks 5.x. I am not a big fan of BW 6.x
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    We have compared MuleSoft and TIBCO BusinessWorks and BW is much more mature than the MuleSoft product. It is proven and reliable so we have it with us. The only downside for TIBCO BusinessWorks is the cost.
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Listed above are some middleware products, but it's not correct if we say how TIBCO BusinessWorks stacks up against them and why you selected TIBCO BusinessWorks. Rather, it should be other way around. They all are competing with TIBCO, they all know TIBCO is the most stable …
    Incentivized
    Chose TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Mulesoft, Oracle SOA and WSO2
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Anypoint PlatformTIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Cloud Data Integration
    Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Feature
    MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
    6.8
    12 Ratings
    TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    5.8
    128 Ratings
    Pre-built connectors7.412 Ratings7.0121 Ratings
    Connector modification7.212 Ratings5.58 Ratings
    Support for real-time and batch integration6.712 Ratings6.4117 Ratings
    Data quality services6.012 Ratings5.56 Ratings
    Data security features6.412 Ratings2.77 Ratings
    Monitoring console7.212 Ratings7.9121 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Anypoint PlatformTIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (22 ratings)
    8.9
    (236 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (28 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    4.5
    (23 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.8
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (28 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.3
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.6
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (5 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (21 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (23 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)