NetApp SnapCenter Backup Management vs. Oracle Coherence

It's great to test and develop new applications. Terrific to identify new and discover networks. Excellent with cost tracking and asset management. Intuitive user interface.

Incentivized

It literally all boils down to the budget a team has. Nowadays, even investment banks look for every opportunity to cut cost. Oracle Coherence is a pretty robust and highly configurable cache application that every team should use if they can afford. If they can't, then open source code is their answer.

Incentivized

• Distributed in memory data managment. Your data is near your data manipulator or calculator engine.
• Write behind, read through, write through concept.
• Fault tolerance and scalable.
• Continueous query, live events, map reduced aggregiation, extend client are few of the very good features I have used.

Incentivized

• Better documentation on setting up various use cases.

Incentivized

It's faster and more secure with data with high-level security layers.

Incentivized

For its efficiency with database backup and recovery.

Incentivized

Oracle Coherence support team is responsive and knowledgeable. We contacted them to ask a couple of design questions about how we were setting up Oracle Coherence based on how we used IBM's Datapower Extreme Scale. They were able to guide us so that we got the design correct the first time and didn't have to go back and re-architect our design later.

Incentivized

Coherence kicks Redis's butt when it comes to performance and feature set. However, it lags far behind in terms of market penetration and cloud readiness.

Incentivized

• Better performance allows us to onboard more clients
• Decom few mainframes that were needed to handle lots of DB queries
• Better customer service with intraday calculations ability.

Incentivized