Object First Ootbi vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Object First Ootbi
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Some backup storage comes with compromise, sacrificing performance for affordability, simplicity for performance, or resilience for simplicity. Object First aims to eliminate the need for Veeam customers to compromise or sacrifice. Object First Ootbi stands for out-of-the-box immutability. Ootbi is ransomware-proof and delivers simple backup storage for Veeam customers. According to the vendor, the solution can be racked, stacked, and powered in 15-minutes. Ootbi is built on immutable…N/A
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Pure Storage offers FlashBlade, a scale-out file and object storage – architected to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) while accelerating tomorrow's discoveries and insights.N/A
Pricing
Object First OotbiPure Storage FlashBlade
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Object First OotbiPure Storage FlashBlade
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Object First OotbiPure Storage FlashBlade
User Ratings
Object First OotbiPure Storage FlashBlade
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Object First OotbiPure Storage FlashBlade
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Pure Storage FlashBlade is best for companies that want their data stored and secure. The big storage capacity and cloud integration secure our data and ensure no third-party access without authorization. It provides us a secure data storage services for our objects. Fast and easy to install and easy to use.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Speed. We are seeing large transactions take very little time.
  • Upgrades- In-place upgrades of both hardware and software are extremely easy.
  • Ease of use- I have several engineers working on this and from setup to day to day operations it is extremely easy to maintain.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • When reporting out a user has exceeded there quote, it only references the UID. It would certainly be nice it calls out the UID name that is clearly present in the Dashboard.
  • The ability to determine a snapshot total size would be helpful.
  • Proactive reachout to discuss new versions and assist in planning the upgrade would be a key win.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Good API, multi-protocol support is great.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Without exception, the contacts with support have been quick and extremely knowledgeable. I do not fear getting an underqualified engineer to assess or work on my arrays. In addition to this support structure, the sales engineers are top notch as well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Pure Storage FlashBlade is in our experience far faster, performance-wise, compared to its close competitors. However, if you factor in any packages you currently have with IBM or AWS for example, you can get more value for money for your data requirements. However, if performance is a must, the increased cost is not an issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Pure has greatly narrowed the performance gap between file storage and fiber channel block storage with FlashBlade. Exotic file systems and costly FC fabrics are no longer needed to run performant storage.
  • Training is not required for a storage admin who has never touched a Pure array. Everything is where you would expect to find it.
Read full review
ScreenShots