Okta vs. PingOne from Ping Identity

Okta

PingOne from Ping Identity

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Okta	Score9 out of 10	N/A	Okta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built in the cloud. IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or whether the applications are in the cloud, on premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure and maintain compliance. The Okta service provides directory services, single sign-on, authentication, provisioning, workflow, and built in reporting. ment systems.	$2 Per User Per Month
PingOne from Ping Identity	Score5.4 out of 10	N/A	The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…	$20,000 per year

Pricing

Okta

PingOne from Ping Identity

Single Sign on: $2.00
Per User Per Month
Multi Factor Authentication: $3.00
Per User Per Month
Single Sign on Adaptive: $5.00
Per User Per Month
Multi Factor Authentication Adaptive: $6.00
Per User Per Month

Essential: $20,000
per year
Plus: $40,000
per year
Premium: Contact Sales

Pricing Offerings
Okta	PingOne from Ping Identity
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

No setup fee

Browse products and price points that make the most sense for your organization on the Okta website.

Try PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Okta	PingOne from Ping Identity
Considered Both Products	Okta Verified User Chose Okta We selected Okta since as I mentioned earlier, speed means a lot to our account. The reason behind that is because it enables us a lot faster and utilize our apps better. Do not get me wrong, PingOne is a great app, its just that the app itself does not have the processing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta We ended up going with OKTA has it had a wider breadth of services from a security perspective at the time so we felt like we were getting more bang for our buck. Not only were we able to take advatage of SSO for all of our apps but we were able to leverage the device trust … Incentivized Helpful? Yatin Garg Product Manager in Product Management at Cars24 (Automotive, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Okta The industry wide performance and reviews of Okta already made it stand out from the competitors. The customisable pricing model helped us to choose from a variety of models as per our needs. The depth and breadth of features and functionalities covered by Okta made it a … Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Hereford Chief Information Officer - EVP in Information Technology at SmartBank (Banking, 501-1000 employees) Chose Okta Okta had competitive pricing, high ease of use, and a short time to implement. They also have a strong and active partner community which also aids in quick adaption. The technical capabilities of this space are leaning more and more toward standards shared by all, but Okta … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta We evaluated Ping. We were able to secure a pricing package for Okta that aligned with our Accounting team's needs. Other services lacked features, or were too embedded in other ecosystems like Microsoft. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta Okta is the best out of its competitors due to its ease of use, out of the box functionality, and opportunities for customization. It is a good company to work with and strives to be there for its customers. Administration is a breeze and the documentation is quite extensive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta I worked on Ping Identity Platform already. So Ping platform is an on-prem based solution. We needed to make sure that the servers where the application is hosted is up and running always. Patching needs to completed based on the vendor release. Ping solution needs more manual … Incentivized Helpful? Qing Miao Program Manager in Information Technology at AppFusions (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose Okta We briefly looked at Ping, but Okta was simply too good as a fit and they did everything to make the decision simple for us. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta Siteminder---It is an on-premise application which is difficult to integrate with cloud-based applications. As Okta is a cloud application we can integrate both on-premise and cloud applications. Ping--It doesn't provide the applications templates which [are] provided by Okta. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta Preferred Okta's reputation as well as other internal factors (relationships) that led us to work with Okta. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Okta Okta has the best dashboard for navigation and is very end-user friendly. Easy to navigate and configure applications and SSO and a very effective way of managing end-user issues. SSO-wise it is the best product in terms of end-user experience; [it's a] seamless process for the … Incentivized Helpful? Jeremiah Miller Associate Director IT Infrastructure in Information Technology at Mennonite Central Committee (Non-Profit Organization Management, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Okta Okta has more robust support for Office 365 than Centrify (which we previously used), and it is easier to configure and administrate. It is cloud-based and easier to manage than Microsoft ADFS. It is similar to OneLogin and Ping but we've found the pricing and support options … Incentivized Helpful? Tim Burns Director of Information Technology in Information Technology at Cubic (Aviation & Aerospace, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Okta Easier to use. More standard implementation Incentivized Helpful? JJ McMahon Systems Engineer II in Information Technology at Seventy Seven Energy (Oil & Energy, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Okta Okta and Ping are similar but the future has been laid out for us by Okta and we believe that that is the correct path for our company and IT team to follow. We try to make sure that we are making progress that we can apply to everything we do and not limit ourselves. We feel … Incentivized Helpful?	Ping Identity Verified User Chose PingOne from Ping Identity This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose PingOne from Ping Identity All contenders were capable, but we had scale concerns with NetIQ's architecture. In the end, what set Ping apart from the others was their level of engagement in understanding our use cases up front during the RFP stage and how they were focused on what we needed more than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose PingOne from Ping Identity I found both platforms compelling from an ease of use and user experience perspective. The decider for me was cost driven as I had already used Ping to drive a self-service transformation in a prior organization, and I intended to do the same at this one. Okta had issues with … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Okta

PingOne from Ping Identity

Comparison of Identity Management features of Okta and PingOne from Ping Identity
Feature	Okta 9.0 124 Ratings	PingOne from Ping Identity 6.5 7 Ratings
ID-Management Access Control	9.4114 Ratings	8.85 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)	9.3123 Ratings	9.97 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication	8.8119 Ratings	9.97 Ratings
Password Management	8.3114 Ratings	8.85 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning	9.3103 Ratings	1.64 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation	9.095 Ratings	2.33 Ratings
ID Risk Management	8.890 Ratings	4.34 Ratings

User Ratings
	Okta	PingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend	8.7 (166 ratings)	7.9 (8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (18 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (1 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Availability	10.0 (4 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	9.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (12 ratings)	8.6 (4 ratings)
Online Training	1.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	9.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

Okta vs. PingOne from Ping Identity

Okta

PingOne from Ping Identity

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons