One Identity Defender vs. PingOne from Ping Identity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
One Identity Defender
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
One Identity, formerly Dell Software, offers Defender, a multi-factor authentication system.N/A
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…
$20,000
per year
Pricing
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Features
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
One Identity Defender
-
Ratings
PingOne from Ping Identity
6.5
Ratings
22% below category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings1.60 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings2.30 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
User Ratings
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
One Identity DefenderPingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
Frankly, it is suited both when someone is working from home or in office. There can be kids who would fiddle with the machine or in office, someone might do it knowingly or unknowingly. This added layer ensures that the user is a tad bit safer. The only problem is that, once you login, you don't get triggers for an entire day. I wish if they add a trigger after every hour or two. I know it would be annoying but at least my identity is secure.
Read full review
The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fast to connect
  • Easy to use
  • Doesn't slow down my computer
Read full review
  • PingFederate is feature-rich, and quickly updated with the latest standards and profiles. This gives us more tools to apply identity standards to modern business challenges.
  • PingFederate and PingCentral were also easy to deploy within docker containers and weave into an infra-as-code deployment, keeping operational overhead low.
  • PingID has an array of supported authenticators for nearly every use case, and early FIDO2 support has us looking into moving to passwordless much more quickly than I had anticipated.
Read full review
Cons
  • Remove the need to enter Windows password
  • Sensitive to interruptions in internet connectivity
Read full review
  • I believe it is very secure & not sure if it needs any improvement as such
  • Only suggestion would be it should not ask users to re-confirm if the session is still active
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
For our enterprise, they've assigned a customer success manager to ensure our needs are being addressed, and that person is top notch in knowing our priorities, enhancement requests, and open cases. Every time we've needed to engage support for a problem or a how-to question, they've been highly responsive and followed up with us to ensure the case was completely resolved. Their support personnel are highly skilled and trained. This is a very customer-centric company.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bomgar is much easier to set up & there is only one step when connecting while Defender takes a few steps.
Read full review
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Defender allows me to connect to the clients environment
  • Without Defender I would not be able to support my client
Read full review
  • it is positive with saving the cost
  • some drawback with aging solution
  • directory is solid and provide lots of cost saving
Read full review
ScreenShots