Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OneCause | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | OneCause supports fundraising with online and event fundraising solutions that help nonprofits reach more and raise more. Since 2008, OneCause states they have helped 14,000 cause-driven organizations to raise over $8B through more than 90,000 fundraising events and campaigns. | $200 per year |
| OneCause | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| OneCause | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() Community Engagement Coordinator at Rainbow Village Inc. (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause We absolutely love 4agood cause for day to day/peer to peer fundraising however, it just was not as robust when it came to event needs which required us to use outside software for those reasons. GiveSmart was good, however a change in their packages required outside sourcing … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Chief Growth and Development Officer at Intermountain Deaconess Children's Services (Mental Health Care, 51-200 employees) Chose OneCause In our experience, OneCause has more lift on the front end than Greater Giving. Especially since, in my opinion, the registration for a live event isn't of the caliber that I've seen from GG. But, if you can handle the registration and use a third-party tool like GivingFuel or … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Foundation Manager at Metropolitan Community College (Education Management, 501-1000 employees) Chose OneCause na Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause I haven't used anything else. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause OneCause is the only auction platform we’ve used and it’s been a great experience. Based off research, OneCause is the leading fundraising platform. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause As previously stated, no comparison. Customer service is above and beyond, user-friendly, technically sound, and funds available immediately. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Executive Assistant in Human Resources at Pacific Southwest Container (PSC) (Packaging & Containers, 501-1000 employees) Chose OneCause n/a Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause I have not used any other products like this and don't plan to because OneCause has been so great. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause We looked at Auctria and GiveSmart, though we didn't go into great detail with either. We ultimately selected OneCause based on the recommendation of another local school that used it for its auction software. The customer service and support as we made this decision and … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause OneCause embarasses other platforms due to all that it can do and with the ease of use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Executive Director & Chief of Staff at National Foundation for Cancer Research (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause Much more modern platform that allowed our event to move online Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Advancement Coordinator at Vail Mountain School (Education Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause I would say they are pretty similar. I think OneCause is a bit more user friendly though. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause I personally never used Otego but it was more expensive then OneCause and it was a one night deal. With OneCause we get to keep the software all year and get to do more events/ auctions because of that. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Event Planning Consultant at Cleveland Clinic / Keep Memory Alive (Non-profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees) Chose OneCause We prefer OneCause to GiveSmart. The platform is better but the support team is really where we saw a major difference. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Founder in Corporate at National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation (Non-profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees) Chose OneCause Eventbrite can't even compare to the features and usability that OneCause offers. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Executive Director in Corporate at FaithCare, Inc (Health, Wellness and Fitness, 1-10 employees) Chose OneCause I honestly forget. It stood out in comparison. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause OneCause is the best event software I've tried yet in terms of supporting a number of auction related features. Our event has very specific needs and OneCause seemed to check enough boxes to fit those needs. I do think in an ideal world we would use an auction/event software … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() WorkTeam Director at UrbanPromise Wilmington (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause We didn't use parts of OneCause to replace what we do in Classy (tickets), so I can't really compare. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause Not a fan of Engaging Networks Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose OneCause None Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Executive Director in Corporate at PHASE ONE Foundation (Fundraising, 1-10 employees) Chose OneCause I have also used Bidding for Good -- a FrontStream product. The main reason I choose OneCause over the others is the customer service and the in-person staffing option. And you are focused on providing event-based services -- GiveSmart is trying to be everything and it's too … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Associate Executive Director in Marketing at Food Bank of Siouxland (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause Our use of Network for Good and OneCause are different, but as far as simply reviewing the interface, Network for Good is more simple to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Director Of Development at Fiver Children's Foundation (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause OneCause surpasses them in several ways regarding usability and functionality both on the back end for administration as well as for donors on the external facing side. Sales team is also nicer Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Comptroller in Finance and Accounting at Vinceremos Therapeutic Riding Center (Non-profit Organization Management, 11-50 employees) Chose OneCause It is extremely user-friendly and generates great reports. We have utilized Donor Pro, which is not on your list. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| OneCause | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 (110 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.8 (8 ratings) |
| Usability | 9.1 (97 ratings) |
| Availability | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 8.9 (97 ratings) |
| In-Person Training | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 8.9 (6 ratings) |
| Configurability | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 (1 ratings) |