| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Autodesk Fusion | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Autodesk Fusion is a cloud-based 3D CAD, CAM, and CAE tool which integrates design, modeling, and simulation capabilities. | $70 per month |
 Onshape | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Onshape is a cloud-native product development platform with integrated CAD, data management and analytics. Onshape aims to accelerate time to market and improve innovation by: 1) Access: Unlike file-based CAD which is on-premise only, Onshape enables remote access for designers and engineers from anywhere, and on any internet-connected device -including tablets and smart phones. 2) Collaboration: Onshape aims to eliminate the version control problems and blocking of file-based… | $1,500 per year per user |
| Autodesk Fusion | Onshape | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | No dedicated hardware is required. Works on all web-connected devices including tablet, Chromebook, iPhone, Android. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Autodesk Fusion | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Autodesk Fusion Fusion 360 has a complete set of design features come for free. It is a no-brainer solution for my industry. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Onshape While a fair likeness in features and use, OnShape has stronger cloud options and baked-in PDM. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape Onshape is better than SOLIDWORKS for online / collaboration. SOLIDWORKS is better for the feature set and integration with other tools. Rhino3D is better at surfacing and workflow with my optical design programs. I have not used Fusion360 except for evaluating in general so I … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape OnShape is a solid type design tool. Besides that, it provides working on the cloud environment. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape OnShape is more powerful, user friendly, and versatile than these alternatives. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape I've kind of already touched on this, but here's another take: Onshape vs. Solidworks - Onshape is much cheaper, more usable, and does certain things much much better. It also removes many pain points I feel with Solidworks (SW). However, SW has decades of development and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape Ease of use, the fact that it's in the cloud (so fast and always accessible) and intuitive design without clutter. TinkerCAD is only for beginners, Blender is for design and art, Fusion 360 is cluttered and confusing, and SolidWorks is pretty close to onshape but its cost and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Onshape We also use Fusion 360 which is more appropriate for certain projects. We were all SolidWorks users, and we still use it from time to time as well. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Autodesk Fusion | Onshape | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer-Aided Design Software |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Autodesk Fusion | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Configurability | 10.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.0 | - |
