OpenAir PSA vs. Teamwork.com

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenAir PSA
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
NetSuite OpenAir is a cloud-based Professional Service Automation (PSA) product which includes capabilities around project management, resource management, project accounting, etc.N/A
Teamwork.com
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Teamwork.com is a project management platform built specifically for client work. The platform helps users deliver work on time and on budget, eliminate client chaos, and understand profitability. Teamwork.com’s customers track and manage their projects with a suite of integrated solutions such as helpdesk, collaboration, knowledge sharing and customer relationship management add-ons, enabling Teamwork.com to be the ‘one-stop shop’ solution for business owners. Headquartered in Cork,…
$13.99
per month per user
Pricing
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Deliver
$13.99
per month per user
Grow
$25.99
per month per user
Free Forever
Free
Up to 5 users
Scale
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsA discount is offered for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Considered Both Products
OpenAir PSA
Chose OpenAir PSA
OpenAir accurately reflects changes in real-time as well as lends itself to see where a draw is at, when payment is expected and what percentage of the contract has been billed or approved to date. This helps with project billing and tracking as well as cash flow. Quickbooks …
Chose OpenAir PSA
We use this CRM software to drive our data. It pulls from this platform and truly compliments it well.
Chose OpenAir PSA
I wasn't involved in the initial purchase decision so I don't know what else we evaluated, but I imagine that we selected OA because we selected NetSuite and OA integrated well with it (same product family). We've been hearing a lot of good things with Mavenlink and will likely …
Chose OpenAir PSA
It is very good to time tracking, resource management, etc. But for Sales specifically and accounting Salesforce helped us much better.
Chose OpenAir PSA
Openair is a mid-range PSA tool, there are more advanced tools to use. The key is to configure it correctly and have expertise on staff.
Chose OpenAir PSA
Previously we used a custom application running on top of Oracle ERP. One of the reasons we chose OpenAIR was because it was covering our requirements for time tracking and project/resource management, much better than the custom app. In addition we got other features like: …
Chose OpenAir PSA
Netsuite is a better and more scaleable solution for our agency as we have grown from just a few employees in 2001 to nearly 100 employees today. Netsuite helps us track expenses, time reporting, getting approvals on large purchases, project management from a personnel …
Chose OpenAir PSA
Our team found that OpenAir has better, increased functionality than other project management programs. Instead of using multiple softwares for time tracking, expense reports and project management, OpenAir combines all three into one. Using one tool instead of three saves us …
Chose OpenAir PSA

We used to use QuickArrow which went end of life at the end of 2009.

We were forced to move onto another platform; which was a good thing since QuickArrow did not fulfill all of our business needs.

Ease of reporting was a HUGE thing for my organization. NetSuite OpenAir PSA has …

Chose OpenAir PSA
It was our goal to be on a single vendor solution for all aspects of our business: CRM, Project Management, and Finance. By choosing NetSuite with OpenAir PSA, we were able to eliminate the need for three other vendor solutions that required external integration among the …
Chose OpenAir PSA
We were handling concurrent project in multiple counties with multiple currencies. Netsuite handles multicurrency well. This was essential for our global operations. Because of this we chose OpenAir over Clarizen.
Chose OpenAir PSA
We came from a QuickArrow envirnoment, so going to OpenAir was the path of least resistance and it hit all the requirements. We looked at Financial Force and Changepoint. Financial Force was very intriguing because of the Salesforce platform, but not all our users are on …
Chose OpenAir PSA
Microsoft Project Server was a very complex solution and often unflexible. We needed something less complex but with power and chose OpenAir.
Chose OpenAir PSA
I was not on the selection team that chose OpenAir. However, as I mentioned in my previous comments, I feel that OpenAir is a great stand alone PSA solution. For OpenSymmetry, we outgrew OpenAir and needed a solution that seemlessly integrated with Salesforce.com CRM data. …
Chose OpenAir PSA
I have evaluated Clarity, ConnectWise, SAP, and Tenrox solutions. From my perspective, judging against our internal have-to-have and nice-to-have criteria, they do not offer the level of flexibility and detail our organization needed to continue to support our current service …
Chose OpenAir PSA
OpenAir was the most complete solution and was strong in all areas.
Chose OpenAir PSA
Oracle PAC professional services automation tool. SAP PSA product
Teamwork.com
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork was the choice for us during the first few years, as it was accessible and affordable. Later on, Asana and Monday.com delivered superior features and functionality.
Chose Teamwork.com
Trello does so much better work in task management, in my opinion. It's much faster and simpler, I believe. The way I see it Teamwork is a slow, complicated waste of money
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork Enterprise IT Product has each and every module which is more advanced features. Impressively, it accepts documents created by other softwares. It works well in smaller devices like android phones. The teamwork Software suite, help you to analyze your projects.
Chose Teamwork.com
Recommended by consultant, while also tested it so decide to implement it in a project.
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork Projects gives us the communication flow between team members, which allows us to complete projects efficiently while keeping in touch. This is important because it shows you the essential aspects to get good results.
Chose Teamwork.com
The tools that Teamwork Projects offer are advanced yet not as confusing when compared to other platforms used in project management. It is compatible with the web and all mobile devices to enable users to go mobile when organizing projects, teams, and resources.
Chose Teamwork.com
Adopting to using the tool is easy for both clients and teams. In addition, being able to give freedom to our teams to work from anywhere has increased productivity. Teamwork Projects has been the perfect tool for us.
Chose Teamwork.com
I spoke about this quite a bit before, but as far as usability goes, Microsoft Projects is totally useless for me, so I avoid it at all costs. Basecamp was just a task management app and had very small feature set beyond that. We had to rig it to do other things for us, but it …
Chose Teamwork.com
Every application has its own Pros &Cons but Basecamp pricing is not much flexible either they had flat per month rate for businesses. Teamwork Graphical user interface is better and their free version is also a plus point. Basecamp only offers 30 days free trial.
Chose Teamwork.com
Haven't used anything else to compare it.
Chose Teamwork.com
We previously relied solely on TaskManager which was an in-house developed task management platform. It did not have a lot of the functionalities that Teamwork has. TaskManager did provide some visualization tools to monitor team member progress but it relied on other tools for …
Chose Teamwork.com
We chose it because it gives us an excellent experience and quality in each internal work process; we perform all our activities in one place and together.
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork was already implemented when I started at the company.
Chose Teamwork.com
I prefer Teamwork over monday.com and google drive, but it could still use more functionality. We primarily use the Gantt chart, but I wish there was more functionality. There aren't as many features as I would like and I wish we didn't need to pay per user. I like things like …
Chose Teamwork.com
Our team overwhelmingly preferred Teamwork Projects to other project management tools. It is reasonably priced while still offering an equal or better product.
Chose Teamwork.com
Before this, we used Trello, which is just not as suited for the case. Trello boards are not made to duplicate process steps, etc. Teamwork is superior in that regard.
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork is everything Project Online should be. It's not straddled with legacy bloat like Microsoft Project, and it is designed from the group up to be a cloud SaaS platform, where MS Project has bolted on the web support and it doesn't offer the same streamlined experience …
Chose Teamwork.com
We have tested other products but according to our context of use, Teamwork suited as the best option due to functionality (complete and easy-to-use) and fair pricing. We found and tested other tools that had the same features but they were not so intuitive. Basically, Teamwork …
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork is designed for collaboration and project management. This application does exactly what it is designed to do without any unwanted/complication features that would confuse a normal (non-technical) user. Very easy to the user interface when compared to other …
Chose Teamwork.com
monday.com is easy and "just works." There wasn't a high learning curve when it came to starting and implementing monday.com for my smaller internal team. However, I don't believe it would have worked on this project. There are too many moving parts and we needed something a …
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork stacks up very well with other project management products. I think it really just depends on what the company and team's needs are to determine which option is right for you. Some people and places will benefit greatly from something as robust and high quality as …
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork is so much easier to use, particularly in the area of timekeeping, than Zoho Projects.
Chose Teamwork.com
Teamwork is way better than ProWorkflow in every way, especially design (UI). PWF was hard to use and that resulted in people not using it and logging time--which caused a whole bunch of business problems. Compared to Basecamp, TW Proejcts is way more organized and easy to …
Chose Teamwork.com
We decided to stay with Teamwork and actually expand its uses because we felt it was the most straightforward solution. It also has robust APIs that our computer operations team could use to integrate into our own systems.
Features
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenAir PSA
7.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Teamwork.com
9.3
Ratings
19% above category average
Task Management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Resource Management7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Scheduling6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document Management8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Email integration7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile Access7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
OpenAir PSA
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Teamwork.com
3.8
Ratings
66% below category average
Quotes/estimates8.00 Ratings1.20 Ratings
Invoicing9.00 Ratings1.20 Ratings
Project & financial reporting8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenAir PSATeamwork.com
Likelihood to Recommend
I would only recommend OpenAir if you are a company of 100+ with complex business processes and have a need to integrate into multiple external systems. I think most project managers find it cumbersome and irritating until they are trained on what not to use. It needs a more simplistic obvious approach rather than having every feature exposed all at once.
Read full review
Teamwork is awesome for teams who need a flexible tool that supports all types of projects. Since it supports kanban it makes visualizing the work to be done and the work in progress very easy. The Gantt chart support is decent and helps to understand how a team is doing when it comes to getting work done in a given time frame. Teamwork isn't a great option for companies that have a bunch of projects going simultaneously due to the way Teamwork structures their billing based on a number of active projects.
Read full review
Pros
  • We had a specific process down pat with QuickArrow and wanted similar functionality. It gave us that and more.
  • It has a lot more reporting functionality than QuickArrow. There are hundreds of options for layout, what is reported, etc. I haven’t played too much with those reports yet. We more or less just replicated reports I had in QuickArrow. We needed the professional services/transition team at NetSuite to help me. There are too many options at this point. I imagine we won’t use all of those reports. Quick Arrow had a lot less.
  • Mobile Capabilities – There wasn’t a mobile concept for QuickArrow. OpenAir has been beneficial for iPhone users for time sheet submissions. There is no app for Droid users yet. There are not a lot of users out there, who really know how to use it yet. Managers are not using the app for dashboards/reporting, etc. The field has been pretty quiet but they do really like the mobile app feature. They like not having to go to laptop to enter their time. That’s all we require of them – just time entry. We ran into some glitches - some of the time sheets submitted via iPhone did not get to the tool itself. That happened in one instance. I made QA aware of it. I am not sure what the resolution turned out to be.
Read full review
  • I am a believer that simple and easy should be the key to create great opportunities.
  • Teamwork has helped me to turn simple task management into the execution of large, massive projects.
  • It has certainly worked great in helping to maintain workflow in my department.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI of many parts of the system is really poorly designed. Inputting and updating forecasts is a very time-consuming and difficult process for our PMs and it doesn't allow any type of upload from a spreadsheet (which might be easiest in absence of a decent UI).
  • I have extensive experience with the reporting piece of OA and have a list of notes and improvements. The entire module is very inflexible at least pieces of it are not intuitive. Easy example: If you create a custom calc with a filter on Project Type to only include hours from our customer projects (Impl and MS), but then create a report with a filter to only show hours from MS, that custom calc won't work properly. The filter logic is unable to handle multiple filters on the same field.
  • Specific example of a ticket we've filed but not heard back on: When you close a project, any remaining forecasts from that project remain active and show as "committed hours" against those individuals which doesn't make sense on projects that are closed. Why would you not give an option to delete any remaining forecasts when closing a project as default behavior?
Read full review
  • Visualization needs to be improved, charts graphs are limited
  • Value stream mapping should be available to determine and prioritize the work.
  • Documentation should be available stepwise with export and printable facility.
  • It should be configurable like ERP with cross functionalities of different users, where users login, assign and approve the work, job or project details, where it should be collectively effected on a project.
  • Add many examples, little more AI, Machine learning required for suggestion and recommendation. It would be a plus point
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We plan to continue our use of NetSuite OpenAir for the reasons cited already. Outside factors, behond our control, would be the only reason we would not renew -- such as an executive mandate to use the same platform going forward. If such were to happen, our Services processes would need to be revamped, as other PSA solutions do not support our current have-to-have criteria.
Read full review
We are already at an annual contract, and have been for the past 5 years; so far the system has delivered, and our personal is already trained in it. A major overhaul of our entire infrastructure (as in moving everything to a single, unified platform) might change the current continuity of Teamwork Projects on our organization, but that's not feasible in the near future.
Read full review
Usability
In this day and age I should not have to read a manual to understand a product. It should be intuitive to administrate and perform basic tasks. It feels like a ton of intelligence was poured into making OpenAir feature rich but no where near as much attention was given to the user experience.
Read full review
The web based user interface is familiar, flexible (boards, task lists, and Gantts) and feature-rich. It is simple enough for the beginner to be effective and robust enough for experienced users to gain efficiencies with advanced techniques. Reporting is intuitive and can be customized for transfer via email or to paper. Great interoperability with other tools make teamwork dependable and a good partner for the overall technology stack.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have not had any outages.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The performance was acceptable. If you had a very large data set you were working with it might take a little longer, but within reason.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As an admin, I've had more contact with OA support than most. I've found their response to tickets typically timely and helpful, however many of the responses to tickets are "we will file an enhancement request" and then I never hear about it again. So not terrible, but not a very fulfilling experience.
Read full review
The support service provided by Teamwork is excellent, and one of the best I've experienced. This is for the following reasons: (1) The speed at which they respond to queries I raise (2) The depth of understanding they have of the product (3) The way in which they are able to understand my questions without needing me to re-explain (4) The quality of the documentation available online (5) The openness they express about current issues and downtime
Read full review
In-Person Training
Very knowledgeable and able to articulate how other customers configured the solution to meet their needs as well as the best practices they recommended.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
We did a 3 day online remote course back in April. NetSuite prefers training to occur before migration. We went over the functionality of tool and three months later we migrated. Personally, I didn’t find it that beneficial. Certain parts of it were beneficial as they applied to me – talked a lot about invoicing capabilities that didn’t apply to me. They also have knowledge base / e-learning assets, but I haven’t referred to them
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It went fine. Everything came over the way we wanted. In addition to migrating the current projects we wanted to migrate historical data – did that seamlessly. The finished product looked pretty good – just needed to tweak – and they helped us with that
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It was our goal to be on a single vendor solution for all aspects of our business: CRM, Project Management, and Finance. By choosing NetSuite with OpenAir PSA, we were able to eliminate the need for three other vendor solutions that required external integration among the disparate systems (Salesforce.com for CRM, MS Project Server for Project Management, and MS Dynamics for finance).
Read full review
I spoke about this quite a bit before, but as far as usability goes, Microsoft Projects is totally useless for me, so I avoid it at all costs. Basecamp was just a task management app and had very small feature set beyond that. We had to rig it to do other things for us, but it failed at that. Asana was a very nice app to trial, but it lacked many of the features that we were looking for.
Read full review
Scalability
Once the system is setup, it's easy to manage and maintain.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It covers our requirements for time tracking and project/resource management better than the previous solution we used.
  • Project managers are happier having this tool for their job and also because it is running on the cloud as opposed to running on-prem.
  • It doesn't help in any way improving the "chasing" of the people that don't submit their time-sheets in time. This one stayed the same as before.
Read full review
  • Overall, it keeps our team on track ensuring that all of our projects are on time and on budget, which definitely contributes to our retention rates.
  • It ensures that we're tracking time on billable tasks which contributes directly to our bottom line.
  • Teamwork Projects also helps us better forecast when a clients project can be completed (alongside the other work our team needs to accomplish) AND it helps us more accurately quote projects in the future because we have historical time tracking data saved.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Teamwork.com Screenshots

Screenshot of Project's viewScreenshot of Task viewScreenshot of Board viewScreenshot of Project's tabScreenshot of Calendar view