TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText ALM/Quality Center vs. Rally Software

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText ALM/Quality Center

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.N/A

    Rally Software

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/ARally Software headquartered in Boulder, Colorado developed the Rally agile software development / ALM platform which was acquired by CA Technologies and rebranded as CA Agile Central. After CA's acquisition by Broadcom the software was once again rebranded as Rally.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText ALM/Quality CenterRally Software
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText ALM/Quality CenterRally Software
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText ALM/Quality CenterRally Software
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    Chose OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    We require a project management tool for waterfall projects with very heavy testing cycles (4-5 regression cycles), definitely no other tool in the market provides the level of support for test management that HP ALM provides.
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    We require a project management tool for waterfall projects with very heavy testing cycles (4-5 regression cycles), definitely no other tool in the market provides the level of support for test management that HP ALM provides.

    On the top of that, testing scope was huge, it …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    JIRA, Rally. We had other HP tools for automation and because of that we decided to go with ALM QC
    Incentivized
    Broadcom
    Chose Rally Software
    Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) & through Test Management were two critical factors that lead to selection of CA Agile Central (formerly Rally).

    Executives want to maintain trace-ability & detailed test management options like we get in ALM along with SAFe implementation support. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Rally Software
    It was a close race between Jama, JIRA and Rally. We decided to go for Jama as a requirements management tool and use Rally for Agile projects. The cost was another factor that made us select Rally.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    OpenText ALM/Quality CenterRally Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (31 ratings)
    7.0
    (17 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.6
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    5.7
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)