Oracle E-Business Suite is a comprehensive suite of integrated, global business applications. The suite includes cross-industry capabilities spanning ERP, CRM and supply chain planning.
N/A
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
I Have not tried other products, I've been an Oracle consultant for a long time, first, an oracle developer, using forms and reports, later, programming Oracle EBusiness Suite Extensions, and an Oracle Consultant for EBusiness Suite and ERP Cloud.
I have not used SAP ERP apart from building automations for it, which were much harder to do so due to automations being classed as scripting which is an expensive extra. This is in contrast with most Oracle tools where UiPath is a licensed partner, which enabled quick and easy …
Oracle eBusiness Suite is an early generation ERP system that we decided to use years ago when the cloud was not even available. EBS was evaluated then against other ERP systems. Over the years, EBS has delivered some value to our business operations.
Oracle e-business suite is better than any other ERP because it is more user-friendly and can be operated by anyone even those who don't know how to run it. Also it has better APS, allowing you to better track costs and allocate resources more efficiently. Also, it has better …
Oracle eBusiness Suite has lots of flexibility in terms of customization and also it has modular approach which makes it each to modify as per their needs.
Oracle eBusiness Suite provides improved financial
management and reporting reliability and ties in GRC requirements.
Oracle prides itself on risk management solutions that help to enforce
Oracle EBS works great on top of the Oracle Database, we selected Oracle EBS as our institutional solution because it really is an integrated solution in which payroll, accounting, fixed assets, and time and labor can interact with each other to deliver the kind of solution …
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work …
Compared with some of the other products that had been used, Oracle Hyperion had solved the major impediment of integrating multiple ERP systems (both SAP and non-SAP) with relative ease while providing the business the leverage to analyze, comprehend, and rectify the data.
Hyperion makes it easier to create reports based on the data available on Hyperion. However is Phocas is better for drilling down information and it is also much more mobile.
None of the other products used or evaluated are available for me to select. I have used EPMware with is a competing software to DRM. I find the ROI on this tool greater then DRM. It is about a quarter of the cost and directly interfaces with multiple Hyperion applications. CXO …
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product. Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different …
Interim Director of Business Intelligence and Finance Systems
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
It is the leading system, with the most power and flexibility of any of these. It is also the most expensive. Berkeley needs the best possible tool for this job. Questica and Workday cannot handle the number of dimensions we use. Adaptive might be a good competitor but since I …
We utilize Tableau as well for reporting, but the good thing about OracleHyperion Enterprise Performance Management is it is in sync with our ledger as we utilize Oracle Ledger from our side. Tableau has a better user interface but the EPM's understanding of the data makes it …
When we were trying to decide between Oracle Hyperion and SAP BPC, the cost and functionality were pretty much the same between both products, but we decided for the Oracle solution as it was better positioned in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for consolidation softwares, and some …
Oracle has led the charge on the development of true EPM reporting. The development of rudimentary KPIs to much more complex models all can be housed and managed by Hyperion. Integrates with Office through Smartview, which provides flexibility in creating Word documents, board …
In our review, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management stacks up pretty well against SAP Business Warehouse. The most glaring area was cost. For a product capable of the same level of reporting day in and day out, Hyperion offered the best bang for the buck. This …
Toyota has a global presence and deals with different countries and different currencies. To manage finance, this tool is the most reliable tool I found if the company has a global presence. If you deal with any tool to manage Financial matters, performance and reliability is …
We have evaluated other options in the past, and we are currently re-evaluating some of the SaaS providers due to the increased strength of those products over the last few years. However, our biggest need continues to be a very capable consolidation tool as we are …
Features
Oracle E-Business Suite
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.6
Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.6
Ratings
30% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
3.0
Ratings
93% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Dashboards
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.1
Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
4.7
Ratings
51% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.5
Ratings
5% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Pricing
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.8
Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.4
Ratings
7% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.8
Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.6
Ratings
18% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.7
Ratings
22% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Forecasting
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle E-Business Suite
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Cash and Treasury Management fill the gaps in treasury management with features that are very helpful in building the modern financial system that we so desperately need. It may not be the most intuitive tool on the treasury market, but with a little more practice time, important expense analysis can be achieved. I am confident in this treasury tool for this year 2022 and I would like to recommend it to other companies so that they can also have a better administration.
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
The EBS Oracle Order Management and Shipping Execution solution allows the creation of an integrated, seamless order-to-cash process and accurately capture of customer orders across multiple channels.
Orchestration of order details for seamless fulfillment execution.
Efficient shipment planning and confirmation.
Communication of order status information to customers throughout the order lifecycle.
HFM is very powerful for financial consolidations .
Hyperion Planning is used to project accurate planning and thus provide the benefit to organization to do allocations and driver based planning so that it can justify the numbers based on headcount, number of stops & Revenue and thus provide valuable projections and thus help reduce the expenses.
Essbase is powerful engine helps provide analytical adhoc reporting for financial users . Performance of reporting and ease of use helps excellent customers experience when doing adhoc analysis.
Because the application is working globally, it sometimes hangs and the connection is dropped.
It should have more shortcuts to make it easier to develop macros. I create many macros and use the "sendkeys" command in VBA, due to the lack of these shortcuts, it is not possible to automate the process.
For now I can not think of other areas that require improvement.
Oracle Hyperion requires a lot of knowledge and expertise to be successful.
The underlying infrastructure of Oracle Hyperion is complex and can be difficult to implement.
Some of the Oracle Hyperion application servers only run on Windows. Windows can sometimes be unstable.
Oracle Hyperion application server processes are dependent on each other and need to be started in a specific order. Therefore, if certain services die on one server, it could require all services/processes in the entire Hyperion landscape to be restarted in the correct order.
After almost 5 years, we have a full control of this ERP System. We are able to implement new functionalities and modules without any major "consulting" expenses. As of today we are making almost 90% of the personalization/customization and implementation all in house. Once [it] is tuned, [it] keeps running very well with no major issues.
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
The various forms - like order entry forms that allow the uses to enter sales orders and the ability to personalize the views based on end user needs - are easy to use and follow standard business processes. The new release has a big focus on usability and forms now have a familiar web look and feel which has increased usability considerably.
Because of the transactional nature of the system this software is available 24 X 7, and IT is responsible for making sure the system is available during normal business hours.
The performance of the product is very good. Given the transactional nature of the system one of the key focus areas for IT is to make sure performance is not affected for internal reasons. This can also depend on the server configuration and setup. For example, performance on Exadata machine is far superior to other Linux custom systems that companies choose to deploy. In general though, as already pointed out, the platform is now very stable and has few bugs. Whenever there are any issues, the cause is usually customizations that we have made to the platform, rather than out-of-the-box standard functionality.
In general, support has not been great - particularly standard (non premium) support . The main issue is that our IT staff has been using this platform for years and is very knowledgeable Whenever something goes wrong, we usually have a very precise idea of what the problem is. We are skilled at problem diagnosis. But the Oracle support process is very rigid and slow. Typically, we are required to go through a lengthy diagnosis process where they ask us multiple questions sometimes over several days and we are obliged to talk to different people with differing levels of knowledge. Since we already know what the problem is, we really just want a patch or a bug fix, but it takes days to get there instead of minutes. This can be very frustrating. This is a big part of the reason why we pay for premium support. But it's still a bit disappointing.
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
The key success factors for the implementation was project management, in-house expertise in IT and time. The implementation process started with the initial evaluation with the initial upgrade on a test system and mapping out the gaps and requirements. We did work with Oracle to understand the new functionality R12 had to offer and did another upgrade and researched solutions. With the use of software development cycle procedures there were conference room pilots with IT, business users. We then refined the project plan to the core key details, performed mock go-live implementations and finally upgraded the software. Overall, this was a very successful process.
Without knowing what product you have now I can not tell you the stack up. I don't want to tell you that this is better than what you have as I have not seen your setup. What I can tell you is that you can't go wrong with the Oracle name. It's a worldwide name and that alone should be taken into consideration. However, talk to your sales reps. Get all the information. Pay an independent Contractor to evaluate what it's truly going to take before going down this road.
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product. Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different business systems is also considered while selecting this product.
We recently implemented Supplier Portal and Invoice Imaging Solution. This has reduced manual effort and increased speed and accuracy. There is no need for people to key in invoices manually now. Suppliers can flip a purchase order into invoice and Oracle will do all the validations and put the invoice on hold in case of any discrepancy.
Suppliers are very happy with the supplier portal as they can track the entire lifecycle of the invoice online.
With automation, we could bill all our customers on time. Oracle collects all the possible costs like payroll and expenses, adds markup, and bills our customers. We could track profitability and margins by project.
The period close and reporting has become easier and faster with this software. 3 people can close the periods now as opposed to 10 before.
We had to get the planning application designed correctly before we got a good ROI, but once we did it became well liked and highly utilized.
It has had a very positive overall impact on increasing finance literacy across campus, allowing units a better insight into their revenues and expenses and the overall planning process.
It has been an essential tool during a time where the campus needed to reduce it's budget by over 100 million dollars annually. Without this product, we would not have a way to identify, track and report on our progress reducing the budget.