Oracle Hyperion (legacy) vs. Planful

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
Planful
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Planful is a cloud-based enterprise performance management (EPM) suite. It includes financial applications for modeling, planning, consolidation, reporting and analytics.N/A
Pricing
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Considered Both Products
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion was easier to use and learn and problem solve issues than Oracle Financials
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Compared with some of the other products that had been used, Oracle Hyperion had solved the major impediment of integrating multiple ERP systems (both SAP and non-SAP) with relative ease while providing the business the leverage to analyze, comprehend, and rectify the data.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion makes it easier to create reports based on the data available on Hyperion. However is Phocas is better for drilling down information and it is also much more mobile.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
None of the other products used or evaluated are available for me to select.
I have used EPMware with is a competing software to DRM. I find the ROI on this tool greater then DRM. It is about a quarter of the cost and directly interfaces with multiple Hyperion applications.
CXO …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product.
Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
It is the leading system, with the most power and flexibility of any of these. It is also the most expensive. Berkeley needs the best possible tool for this job. Questica and Workday cannot handle the number of dimensions we use. Adaptive might be a good competitor but since I …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We utilize Tableau as well for reporting, but the good thing about OracleHyperion Enterprise Performance Management is it is in sync with our ledger as we utilize Oracle Ledger from our side. Tableau has a better user interface but the EPM's understanding of the data makes it …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
When we were trying to decide between Oracle Hyperion and SAP BPC, the cost and functionality were pretty much the same between both products, but we decided for the Oracle solution as it was better positioned in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for consolidation softwares, and some …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Due to being the industry forefront and owned by Oracle
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Oracle has led the charge on the development of true EPM reporting. The development of rudimentary KPIs to much more complex models all can be housed and managed by Hyperion. Integrates with Office through Smartview, which provides flexibility in creating Word documents, board …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We also took a look to Cognos, but since we have Oracle eBS as our main ERP, we decided without a very deep analysis.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
In our review, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management stacks up pretty well against SAP Business Warehouse. The most glaring area was cost. For a product capable of the same level of reporting day in and day out, Hyperion offered the best bang for the buck. This …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Toyota has a global presence and deals with different countries and different currencies. To manage finance, this tool is the most reliable tool I found if the company has a global presence. If you deal with any tool to manage Financial matters, performance and reliability is …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Pricing is one factor and the features offered by the Oracle EPM and IBM cognos shifted the favour in terms of Oracle EPM.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We have evaluated other options in the past, and we are currently re-evaluating some of the SaaS providers due to the increased strength of those products over the last few years. However, our biggest need continues to be a very capable consolidation tool as we are …
Planful
Chose Planful
This is the first company we’ve used and it’s been a good experience. I would recommend to others
Chose Planful
Planful is next-gen compared to Hyperion. A lot more user-friendly and more potent than Anaplan.
Chose Planful
Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI
Chose Planful
We enjoy planful and have preferred it compared to similar products because of the personability, helpfulness form customer service, easy sign on, ability to customize reports, and run easy consolidation process.
Chose Planful
The price for Planful was amazing and it was exactly what we needed. OneStream was overkill for our immediate needs.
Chose Planful
We selected Planful because we preferred the service to the competitors we reviewed and also due to the implementation process and timeline.
Chose Planful
Most financial folks user-friendly less technical support needed; most efficient and automated; data host in US; most automated with both the core application and excel spotlight in sync, you can view and sync in web or excel. Process time is fast.
Chose Planful
Planful was able to show us how we could benefit for our business in the demo better than the other companies
Chose Planful
Prior to joining the company, we tried to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. There we're a few reasons it didn't work out, but a lot of it related to the implementation team they provided. In just the first week with Planful, we achieved more progress than we did in several …
Chose Planful
Planful's user interface is much more user-friendly than OneSteam. I wasn't as heavy of a Onestream user as Planful so can't fully compare. I am Power User and building system for Planful whereas I was purely end user for Onestream.
Chose Planful
We liked the Excel-based interface and Planful's reporting capabilities. The dashboarding feature also offers a visual look at KPIs without purchasing another software, saving the company money.
Chose Planful
Previously we used Infor CPM and Alight Planning. Planful is head and shoulders above both of these systems. We have been extremely happy with it. It has cut our workload in half compared to the other two systems. There is little to nothing in the other two systems that we miss …
Chose Planful
Planful scored high in multiple areas (such planning, reporting, Workforce controlling) and based on our assessment criteria Planful receive the highest value/cost ratio. At the same time, we were confident that Planful was able to scale together with the business and manage …
Chose Planful
It has been quite some time since I have used or evaluated some of the other products out there.
Chose Planful
Before my arrival at the company, we attempted to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. We got further with Planful in the first week than in several months with Vena.
Chose Planful
Workforce Planning in Planful is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Reporting in Planful is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Similarity to Excel is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Adaptive Insights can budget/forecast weekly or daily rather easily, which is a huge …
Chose Planful
Planful is winning in user experience. More intuitive design and very user friendly. I do expect more flexibility in terms of system confirgurations like higher hierarchy limit
Chose Planful
I was not involved in the selection process, but have owned Planful as a FP&A tool since its infancy.
Chose Planful
Planful was a more cost effective approach vs our previous platform (Adaptive) and is able to be managed fully within the FP&A team (no IT resources or outside consultants post-implementation)
Chose Planful
N/A; wasn't involved in the selection process, only the implementation following selection.
Chose Planful
Planful seems to do a better job of pulling things in a format that is more understandable to an accounting-minded person, whereas the other platforms seem more focused on operations. From a detail perspective, Planful provides more powerful and complete data, in my experience. …
Chose Planful
Planful seems to have the best price to performance option against the tools listed. Some of the more premium options on the market have outdated UIs and dont get updated as frequently and other in the same price category dont seem to have the same level of options and "ease" …
Features
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Planful
7.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Long-term financial planning10.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Financial budgeting10.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Forecasting10.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling10.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Management reporting10.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
8.2
Ratings
0% above category average
Planful
5.3
Ratings
41% below category average
Personalized dashboards8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.10 Ratings5.40 Ratings
KPIs9.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.90 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data6.00 Ratings3.10 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
5.4
Ratings
34% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
6.8
Ratings
19% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
8.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
5.7
Ratings
33% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
6.9
Ratings
16% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Planful
6.4
Ratings
26% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Planful
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
Read full review
Reporting and Spotlight have changed the game for us. Spotlight has brought dynamic reporting to our team and the rest of the office as well. With dynamic planning, we've spent more time doing analysis instead of running and creating the reports. Recently, we've spent less time analyzing and more time formatting, and Spotlight has brought the analysis back to FP&A.
Read full review
Pros
  • HFM is very powerful for financial consolidations .
  • Hyperion Planning is used to project accurate planning and thus provide the benefit to organization to do allocations and driver based planning so that it can justify the numbers based on headcount, number of stops & Revenue and thus provide valuable projections and thus help reduce the expenses.
  • Essbase is powerful engine helps provide analytical adhoc reporting for financial users . Performance of reporting and ease of use helps excellent customers experience when doing adhoc analysis.
Read full review
  • Creating forecasts for the month, quarter, and year
  • Creating new variables by using variables pre-defined and that are new in the system
  • Having a very simple setup in the reports section - not straying away from the old Excel model which most people are used to. I can speak for a lot of people when I say that tools that look new can easily be frightening! 😅
Read full review
Cons
  • Oracle Hyperion requires a lot of knowledge and expertise to be successful.
  • The underlying infrastructure of Oracle Hyperion is complex and can be difficult to implement.
  • Some of the Oracle Hyperion application servers only run on Windows. Windows can sometimes be unstable.
  • Oracle Hyperion application server processes are dependent on each other and need to be started in a specific order. Therefore, if certain services die on one server, it could require all services/processes in the entire Hyperion landscape to be restarted in the correct order.
Read full review
  • Dashboarding could be more flexible and easier to use.
  • Dynamic Reporting has room for flexibility with nesting, dimension names showing up instead of “All,” and overall flexibility.
  • Make Analyze view in Spotlight more intuitive.
  • A high-level onboarding guide to understanding the different components of Planful, data flows, and tips & tricks.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
Read full review
Our new Comptroller understands the value of Planful, and we plan to utilize it further in the organization to enhance external reporting. Strangely enough, Planful had not previously been embraced by the former CFO, who argued that we were running two sets of books (of course, we were not). Fortunately, the before mentioned reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income demonstrated that to the banks.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The tool is extremely adaptable, and it enables very quick querying to give us opportunity to gain live insights into the business. Given its adaptability, we are also able to create scenario analyses very quickly in rapidly changing environments. The formatting also enables us to provide this information in a very consumable manner.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I only give a 9 rating rather than a 10 rating because it seems that every day around 2pm we see a slowdown in the use of Planful. I have requested our internal IT department verify that it is not an internal issue and have been assured it is the tool. We have not yet reached out to Planful to do extensive research to solve this issue.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Again, the system is very reliable and, for the most part, runs very quick and smooth. When running larger queries, it does take some time, and during budgeting season our users experienced slower loading times, but nothing that raises concerns outside of normal network issues. Occasionally, as with any software we use, it will crash and you have to restart, but that does not happen very often.
Read full review
Support Rating
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
Read full review
Sometimes we get great help when using Planful's support team and other times we don't. In particular, there is one person that often responds to our support tickets who is less than helpful, hence the reason for the 5 out of 10 rating. As a result, most of the time we reach out to our Planful consulting group as they provide faster and better support
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
We got little training on the tool after implementation. Did a lot of "trial by fire" learning about Planful. I don't think RSM really provided us all the details we needed to understand the tool and to know what we needed to train on. I don't know we knew enough about the tool to even ask the right questions and then they left and we used Planful support a lot.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
This training is much more robust now than it was when we first implemented our Planful environment. Many times we can do a little research in the "help" portal and do not even need to reach out to support. They are continuously improving the training and information available to users.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Most of the issues in the implementation were self inflicted, the team at Top Down was great and did a good job managing hours and teaching our team how to best handle the system. The implementation went longer than expected as they always do but the GL and erp link was up and running quickly so we could build reporting
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product. Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different business systems is also considered while selecting this product.
Read full review
Personally I have only used essbase in my work. Planful has a much easier platform to use both to put together results and to load data compared to the financial reporting platforms that I have used. Planful also has better dedicated tools to create reports and build in a dedicated software that is built to report on rather than building from scratch in an excel environment
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
From our experience, Planful is only used in 2 overhead departments in our organization. We easily added another overhead department, but they decided against using Planful for their workforce and financial planning. Removing them from our environment was extremely easy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We had to get the planning application designed correctly before we got a good ROI, but once we did it became well liked and highly utilized.
  • It has had a very positive overall impact on increasing finance literacy across campus, allowing units a better insight into their revenues and expenses and the overall planning process.
  • It has been an essential tool during a time where the campus needed to reduce it's budget by over 100 million dollars annually. Without this product, we would not have a way to identify, track and report on our progress reducing the budget.
Read full review
  • Has allowed users to view a real-time P&L in a way they weren't able to do with Qlik.
  • Budget to Actual analysis has become much more streamlined and actionable
  • Long-range plan process has been significantly streamlined and a lot of time has been cut out of the process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planful Screenshots

Screenshot of the Planful Planform DashboardScreenshot of Planful for FinanceScreenshot of Planful for MarketingScreenshot of ReportsScreenshot of a Capacity Planning TemplateScreenshot of Integrations