| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Outlaw | Score8.9 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Outlaw’s contract automation platform adapts to the user's needs for rapid adoption. Outlaw boasts flexible, simple pricing in order to make it affordable for all team sizes (no maint. fees, unlimited storage & eSignatures). The platform unifies contract generation, document automation, in-app collaboration & negotiations, and a repository into a single user experience. Whether starting from self-serve templates or 3rd party/customer agreements or legacy contracts, the vendor boasts… | N/A |
 PandaDoc | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
| Outlaw | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Out modular unified platform is built to easily adapt to your organization and unique contracting processes. Work with us to establish a plan that meets the specific needs of your team. Schedule a time with our experts here: https://getoutlaw.com/request-demo/ | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Outlaw | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Outlaw Outlaw was selected based on simplicity and price, but we had to move away from Outlaw due to lack of integration. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Outlaw | PandaDoc | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Authoring | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contract Collaboration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contract Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Outlaw | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.6 |
| Support Rating | 9.9 | 6.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.3 |
| Configurability | - | 2.8 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.6 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.7 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 6.7 |
