Paligo vs. Storyblok

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Paligo
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Paligo, headquartered in Stockholm, offers their component content management system (CCMS), supporting the creation and publishing of technical documentation and help systems.
$4,800
per year
Storyblok
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Storyblok helps teams to tell their stories and manage their content for every use-case: corporate websites, e-commerce, helpdesks, mobile apps, and screen displays. Storyblok features: Visual Editor: Live preview changes made on a website Component approach: Nestable content bloks make content management easy. Headless / API: Access data through its APIs Boasting customers in nearly every industry and country, Storyblok states they help thousands of…
$0
Free with 1 Seat
Pricing
PaligoStoryblok
Editions & Modules
Professional
from $4800
per year
Business
Contact Sales
per year
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Starter
$0
Free with 1 Seat
Growth
$99
per month Includes 5 team member seats
Growth Plus
$349
per month Includes 15 team member seats
Enterprise
$3,299
per month 30 users included
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PaligoStoryblok
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PaligoStoryblok
Considered Both Products
Paligo
Chose Paligo
I was working with 10+ CMS:es (list here is not possible choose them from) “all my active work life” and Paligo GUI is unique: No or very few systems of this complexity have a rational GUI. Paligo stands out here and is very user friendly! When it comes to style sheets and …
Chose Paligo
Simpler, more aesthetic and clean, easier to use, inherent design that molds the user based on section limitations, etc.
Chose Paligo
All the positives described in previous answers
Chose Paligo
Paligo is way easier to use than Flare.
Chose Paligo
Paligo is better than both, by far. Confluence is only as good as its third-party addons and Robohelp isn't worth talking about.
Chose Paligo
Paligo gives you the benefits of a fully integrated XML content database, making the whole package much easier to setup and use than a system using Oxygen. It's much easier to set up and far less expensive than Adobe's XML offerings. The cost is comparable to MadCap, but all …
Chose Paligo
I was not part of the selection process / did not evaluate other tools. I had previously been authoring my content in Google Suite or directly in our Learning Management System. Both of those were hells of information duplication.
Chose Paligo
We were using our own, custom management scheme - relying on tools like Sharepoint to store and collaboratively edit.
But we were lacking the reusability feature and content control features that Paligo provides.
Chose Paligo
Paligo is a different league. Cloud based for easy access and collaboration from anywhere. Great taxonomy and HTML5 features.
Chose Paligo
Compared to Author-It, Paligo is a godsend. It's so much more performant, the output quality is much higher, and the user experience is unmatched.
Before we switched to Paligo, I had to spend multiple working days just fixing the broken output that Author-It has given me, …
Chose Paligo
We moved from Flare to Paligo. One of the main reasons was the fact that Paligo is a cloud product. Collaboration with anyone outside of our team was more difficult with Flare. Also, maintaining a server for Flare content was going to become an issue, and overall I felt the …
Chose Paligo
They are both good documentation options, but the cloud-native capabilities and intuitive UI of Paligo, plus it's ability to produce excellent output for both PDF and HTML5 were the main reasons I chose Paligo. I am very satisfied with my choice.
Chose Paligo
Affordable and easy to use. Several different tasks can be handled in the same tool - not just for editing.
Chose Paligo
We selected Paligo over the alternatives for a variety of reasons:
It was cloud-based (usable on a Mac)
It had the features we needed: Content reuse Variables Easy restructuring and maneuverability of content
Chose Paligo
Intuitive cloud-native tool based on XML that does true single-sourcing - not one of these other competitors has this unique combination.
Chose Paligo
Better Support than any of the others; Ability to migrate at cost (unlike AIT and Flare); Teamwork and centralized variables (unlike Word, Google Docs, FM); Diff and Revert (must-have feature); L10N features (better than all others).
Chose Paligo
Paligo is the only structured authoring tool that natively publishes to ZenDesk. My team is forced to publish to ZenDesk, so this was easy.
Chose Paligo
I trialed a version of Oxygen XML editor, but the fact that Paligo is cloud-based and integrates directly to Zendesk sold me, even though Oxygen XML is essentially the de facto standard for most structured authoring.
Storyblok

No answer on this topic

Features
PaligoStoryblok
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.7
Ratings
18% below category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.5
Ratings
15% below category average
API00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
6.1
Ratings
19% below category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PaligoStoryblok
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PaligoStoryblok
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PaligoStoryblok
Likelihood to Recommend
Paligo is particularly well suited for developing similar document sets for multiple products or product lines. It is not a page layout application, so don't expect the same capabilities as popular applications for graphics-heavy documentation. With some up-front time developing good layouts, however, Paligo does manage to create very usable PDF output for customer-facing documents.
Read full review
The collection of multiple reports from different integrated tools and the ability to provide effective predictive analytics and the real-time data results production capability is profitable. Social media platform integration functionalities allow the user to easily manage various marketing content across different platforms and the content accessibility is amazing.
Read full review
Pros
  • The review mode is super convenient. Comparing a snapshot of the previous versions with the current one clearly outlines the respective changes and reduces the necessary content to review tremendously.
  • The option to reuse text fragments is another handy feature. Text fragments will be updated whenever the original text fragment is altered is also extremely helpful.
  • Managing a content's structure was never easier. An intuitive drag & drop functionality allows you to design your document's structure however you like.
  • You can also fork content, in addition to reuse text fragments. This is another helpful option that no longer requires you to create repetetive chapters over and over.
Read full review
  • Very easy to generate project documents
  • Obtaining the best data insights across cloud services
  • Easy creating various content
Read full review
Cons
  • The amount of CSS/JS required to customize a site's appearance can be cumbersome
  • Product documentation can be lacking, specifically with integrations; in some cases, support offered no real help when trying to solve a problem with an integrated service
  • Some features require extensive development experience to use, which can sometimes be an obstacle to less-experienced team members
Read full review
  • Update can be improved
  • Interface configuration
  • Analyzing multiple gathered data content
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Paligo single-sources beautifully. Allows for customization. Has the best translation features. Has the best support services.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Generally, I'm very happy with Paligo and the productivity gains that I get from using it. There are a few arbitrary limitations on structure, and when applying conditional formatting, that I don't really understand. Unlinking / editing reused text uses this broadly inscrutible colour-coding that I just hate. It would be nice to double-click a component, make edits, then respond to a popup asking if I want to confirm the edit for all linked content, or unlink this instance. Likewise converting from an informal topic insertion to duplicates of its raw contents.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
So far, support has been excellent. They reply very quickly and give in-depth replies. Solutions advisors and account managers have also been very responsive and clearly focused on creating the best experience for implementation. And that's only when the answers can't be found in excellent product documentation. The online training class and tutorials are also very good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Everything went well
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Paligo gives you the benefits of a fully integrated XML content database, making the whole package much easier to setup and use than a system using Oxygen. It's much easier to set up and far less expensive than Adobe's XML offerings. The cost is comparable to MadCap, but all our content was already in Docbook, so the transition to Paligo was nearly seamless.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive - has allowed us to create templates for integration documentation. this has greatly sped up our process for creating articles for each of our integrations, which we haven't had up to this point.
  • Positive - has created greater alignment between the self-service content team and the marketing team.
  • Positive - has introduced a review and feedback workflow for our content creation that was not available in ZenDesk. The feedback directly in the app allows me to pinpoint comments about text and other elements so my writers can address them directly and become better writers in the long term.
  • Negative - long ramp up time due to a completely different approach to creating content. My team was training in early August and we have not yet published our new help center (though, to be fair, it is a lot of content that had to be completely rewritten)
  • Positive - any UI updates only require updating a single image, which has saved us dozens of hours of updating already.
Read full review
  • Clear and reliable data reports generation is very easy.
  • Data accessibility Storyblok is amazing.
  • Marketing management across different platforms
Read full review
ScreenShots

Paligo Screenshots

Screenshot of branching in PaligoScreenshot of conditional filters in PaligoScreenshot of the contributor editor in PaligoScreenshot of some of the integration options in PaligoScreenshot of the main editor in PaligoScreenshot of multi-channel publishing options in Paligo

Storyblok Screenshots

Screenshot of The Storyblok DashboardScreenshot of Live Editing with StoryblokScreenshot of Rich text experience using Storyblok