TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

PayPal Zettle vs. Square POS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PayPal Zettle

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/APayPal Zettle (formerly PayPal Here) is a POS and payment processing system that includes either a mobile card reader or a chip reader (hardware), and is powered by the mobile PayPal Here app. Admins can add up to 1,000 users per account, and the app also includes invoicing, reporting, and inventory management features. The pricing structure for payment processing is: 2.7% per US card swipe. 3.5% + $0.15 to key in cards. 2.9% + $0.30 to invoice. 1% for cross-border transfers.N/A

    Square POS

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ASquare POS is a point-of-sale software solution with features such as accept credit cards with your iPhone, Android, and iPad along with the flexibility to accept credit card payments anywhere, from Square headquartered in San Francisco, California.

    $10

    per each additional reader; first reader free

    Pricing
    PayPal ZettleSquare POS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Each Transaction
    2.6% + $0.10
    per transaction
    Square Reader for magstripe
    $10
    per each additional reader; first reader free
    Square Stand for contactless and chip
    $16
    per month
    Square Terminal
    $27
    per month
    Square Register
    $39
    per 24 months
    Square Reader for contactless and chip
    $49
    per reader
    Square Point of Sale
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PayPal ZettleSquare POS
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PayPal ZettleSquare POS
    Considered Both Products
    PayPal
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    1) Square has a much more expensive startup cost in purchasing their hardware.
    2) Square POS is not tailored for eCommerce
    3) Square is not as easy to work with and has terrible customer service.
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    Square POS is substantially similar to PayPal Here in cost and function, but it doesn't allow us to collect the necessary data for campaign finance reporting and compliance. In past campaigns we would have to process a card donation and then still make donors fill out an …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    The main selection criteria were ease of use and the presence of a plugin for WooCommerce. However, in practice it turned out that an important factor is also the availability of the product for purchase in a small batch and at an affordable price. I chose PayPal Zettle because …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    Paypal's rates are slightly higher than my rates with Square or Stripe. While I can accept card payments with the Stripe app it isn't a true POS system.
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    They are both comparable and honestly could not say one is better than the other. I suggest looking at both options and picking what works best for you!
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    Square has good software and is relatively easy to use. The Square payment screen is more advanced than the basic model that PayPal uses. However, PayPal was a service that I already used-- and the company made it easy to integrate it into our business. Convenience and ease of …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    It's been a while now since I've compared the two, but PayPay and Square were relatively similar for what we needed them for. I think the physical PayPal product at the time was a little bit more of what we needed, but I don't remember it being a very large margin between the …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    Ultimately we selected PayPal Here because PayPal is such a trusted and well-known name, because of the easy-to-navigate user interface, because the card reader was inexpensive but performs well, and because the organization was already using PayPal to collect donations through …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    I received my Square reader faster and it does its job well but, but the reader itself is small and very easy to lose. Unlike PayPal, I had to create a new account that would only be used for that single purpose. PayPal Here is an extension of PayPal so set-up was flawless and …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    Compared to Square, PayPal Here is less much less reliable. I have never struggled to take a payment with Square whether I was swiping the card or manually entering the card information. I feel like our customers are more accustomed to seeing the Square card reader as well …
    Incentivized
    Chose PayPal Zettle
    I have used Square. It worked okay most of the time. The card reader went bad a couple times and happened pretty fast. It was not the best for how many cards we needed to swipe on a daily basis.
    Incentivized
    Block, Inc (Square)
    Chose Square POS
    Square and paypal are very similar, both work well and are trustworthy. Both also charge small service fee for payments received but I prefer the ease of Square.
    Incentivized
    Chose Square POS
    The only other real competitor that we looked at was PayPal Here and we went with Square because the fee structure felt fairer, and because our customers were much more familiar with the Square hardware and ecosystem, rather than trying to convince them that Paypal was a viable …
    Incentivized
    Chose Square POS
    While PayPal Here had lower fees for swiped transactions, we often had issues which could not be resolved quickly and caused us to have to invoice customers instead of take payments while on site. I prefer Square POS because it is reliable. Additionally, we may eventually …
    Incentivized
    Chose Square POS
    We chose Square because the simplicity of setup and reduced fees over its competitors. We liked the ease of setting up inventory alerts, tracking and sales reports. Its competitors had good functionality and even some things that Square does not, but in overall respect, Square …
    Incentivized
    Chose Square POS
    Square offers about 70-80% of what all the others do, but when stacking out the pricing and efficiencies, it's competitively priced leaving more money in our pockets while the spend to get that other 20%-30% doesn't make sense operationally.
    Incentivized
    Chose Square POS
    Square POS outshines both Paypal and Authorize.Net in terms of doing the whole kit and kaboodle (website sales, in-person sales, and inventory management). The API is easier to work with, is more supported for e-commerce, and payments are swift and available almost instantly. …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    PayPal ZettleSquare POS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (20 ratings)
    10.0
    (59 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.6
    (9 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.7
    (18 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)