Planful vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planful
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Planful is a cloud-based enterprise performance management (EPM) suite. It includes financial applications for modeling, planning, consolidation, reporting and analytics.N/A
Vena
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
PlanfulVena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PlanfulVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PlanfulVena
Considered Both Products
Planful
Chose Planful
This is the first company we’ve used and it’s been a good experience. I would recommend to others
Chose Planful
Planful is next-gen compared to Hyperion. A lot more user-friendly and more potent than Anaplan.
Chose Planful
Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI
Chose Planful
We enjoy planful and have preferred it compared to similar products because of the personability, helpfulness form customer service, easy sign on, ability to customize reports, and run easy consolidation process.
Chose Planful
The price for Planful was amazing and it was exactly what we needed. OneStream was overkill for our immediate needs.
Chose Planful
We selected Planful because we preferred the service to the competitors we reviewed and also due to the implementation process and timeline.
Chose Planful
Most financial folks user-friendly less technical support needed; most efficient and automated; data host in US; most automated with both the core application and excel spotlight in sync, you can view and sync in web or excel. Process time is fast.
Chose Planful
Planful was able to show us how we could benefit for our business in the demo better than the other companies
Chose Planful
Prior to joining the company, we tried to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. There we're a few reasons it didn't work out, but a lot of it related to the implementation team they provided. In just the first week with Planful, we achieved more progress than we did in several …
Chose Planful
Planful's user interface is much more user-friendly than OneSteam. I wasn't as heavy of a Onestream user as Planful so can't fully compare. I am Power User and building system for Planful whereas I was purely end user for Onestream.
Chose Planful
We liked the Excel-based interface and Planful's reporting capabilities. The dashboarding feature also offers a visual look at KPIs without purchasing another software, saving the company money.
Chose Planful
Previously we used Infor CPM and Alight Planning. Planful is head and shoulders above both of these systems. We have been extremely happy with it. It has cut our workload in half compared to the other two systems. There is little to nothing in the other two systems that we miss …
Chose Planful
Planful scored high in multiple areas (such planning, reporting, Workforce controlling) and based on our assessment criteria Planful receive the highest value/cost ratio. At the same time, we were confident that Planful was able to scale together with the business and manage …
Chose Planful
It has been quite some time since I have used or evaluated some of the other products out there.
Chose Planful
Before my arrival at the company, we attempted to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. We got further with Planful in the first week than in several months with Vena.
Chose Planful
Workforce Planning in Planful is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Reporting in Planful is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Similarity to Excel is a plus compared to Adaptive Insights. Adaptive Insights can budget/forecast weekly or daily rather easily, which is a huge …
Chose Planful
Planful is winning in user experience. More intuitive design and very user friendly. I do expect more flexibility in terms of system confirgurations like higher hierarchy limit
Chose Planful
I was not involved in the selection process, but have owned Planful as a FP&A tool since its infancy.
Chose Planful
Planful was a more cost effective approach vs our previous platform (Adaptive) and is able to be managed fully within the FP&A team (no IT resources or outside consultants post-implementation)
Chose Planful
N/A; wasn't involved in the selection process, only the implementation following selection.
Chose Planful
Planful seems to do a better job of pulling things in a format that is more understandable to an accounting-minded person, whereas the other platforms seem more focused on operations. From a detail perspective, Planful provides more powerful and complete data, in my experience. …
Chose Planful
Planful seems to have the best price to performance option against the tools listed. Some of the more premium options on the market have outdated UIs and dont get updated as frequently and other in the same price category dont seem to have the same level of options and "ease" …
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena also allows for much more dynamic report building and refresh rather than manual updates throughout reports. The user interface is also much easier to understand compared to Oracle, which allows new users to adopt faster and get familiar with Vena. Overall, Vena is …
Chose Vena
Vena is much faster than other such software which is available in market. If we talking about pricing $$$ so Vena is affordable to smaller companies also. it's help us quicker integrations with other software and User Interface is much better than other software. Vena gives …
Chose Vena
We found Vena to be much more intuitive and easy to leverage with our existing models and templates we've built in Excel already. It allowed our finance and ops teams to get traction and value from the solution much faster than we felt the other CPM solutions we looked at.
Chose Vena
Both the softwares have effectively been integrated together to make my job as an analyst easier. This helps in generating accurate data interpretations and led to better results in sales of our products and improved client services and feedback.
Chose Vena
I guess they both compliment each other by integration and by both checks I can get the accuracy in result. And growth in sales by finding the key parameters where we need to work.
Chose Vena
Vena Solutions stands out due to its familiar Excel-based interface, making it easy for our team to adopt without extensive training. Compared to alternatives like Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, Vena's strong customer support and efficient automation have significantly reduced …
Chose Vena
Vena stands out from competitors due to its seamless Excel integration, which allows us to leverage a tool we are already familiar with while adding automation, collaboration, and advanced financial planning. Unlike some platforms that require fully new systems, Vena's …
Chose Vena
Data Rails is similar to Vena but easier to use and at a lower price. Historically, ERP systems provided much of what we used Vena for. That currently is not the case and these additional subscriptions are necessary. What used to be a simple process that required little …
Chose Vena
In comparison to its competitors what has helped Vena stack up against them is its wide range of solutions in specific. Having a curated group of solutions, powered with IT-backed automation, integration with 365 and compliance with the latest trends and legal formulations is …
Chose Vena
We did not evaluate any other products. We knew we wanted to embrace, not replace, excel, and Vena is best in class as a CPM tool that leverages Excel as a lens into the database.
Chose Vena
Excel is the window into Vena's platform so it makes it familiar and scalable.
Chose Vena
Ultimately we decided on Vena because of the Excel interface which we knew would improve adoption. We also like the platform agnostic integration and easy-to-use web interface. The OLAP cube was also appealing to allow for a variety of pivoted reports.
Chose Vena
Our data is too large for Power BI desktop and our ERP, D365, does not have an easy or clean way to get our budget entered.
Chose Vena
We had quotes from three different companies including Vena. Even with a higher pricing, Vena made the best impression with a powerful software and a solid solution. With another competitor, we would have to engage a bookkeeper to support our consolidation. Vena didnt …
Chose Vena
Tableau is by far the best tool I've used. Vena in comparison is very good but it's missing the master data link to SAP, and the ability of data to refresh when the hierarchies move. It's also lacking standard reports on system set up like basic P&L's, etc. It's also missing …
Chose Vena
we used Fiserv AML Risk and MPC. Risk was used for ALM (we will still need to find another solution for this as Vena does not offer this). We also used Fiserv MPC for budgeting and forecasting. This system was extrmely inefficient and provided us with many complications and …
Chose Vena
apart from excel this is the only software that I have used that uses this type of financial modeling
Chose Vena
Vena being a Excel add in makes it very attractive. Also, there are certain features that Vena had was very fascinating compared to their competitors. It was easy for users to grasp it as it looked and worked just as Excel.
Features
PlanfulVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Planful
5.5
Ratings
33% below category average
Vena
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports5.40 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Customizable dashboards5.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates5.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Planful
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Vena
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Drill-down analysis7.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration6.70 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Planful
6.8
Ratings
19% below category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web8.10 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Publish to PDF6.60 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Report Versioning6.30 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling6.10 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Planful
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
Vena
7.7
Ratings
1% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Planful
8.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.30 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.70 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.20 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Planful
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Vena
7.3
Ratings
8% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access8.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.30 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Planful
7.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Vena
8.1
Ratings
2% below category average
Long-term financial planning7.90 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.40 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Forecasting7.30 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Scenario modeling6.70 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Management reporting6.60 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Planful
5.8
Ratings
31% below category average
Vena
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Financial data consolidation7.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Journal entries and reports5.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Multi-currency management4.90 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations5.90 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership5.20 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting6.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails6.10 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Planful
6.9
Ratings
16% below category average
Vena
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting7.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management Reporting7.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting7.40 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting6.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.10 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Planful
5.3
Ratings
41% below category average
Vena
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Personalized dashboards6.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards5.40 Ratings8.60 Ratings
KPIs6.10 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis6.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting5.40 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data3.10 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Planful
6.4
Ratings
26% below category average
Vena
8.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Flat file integration7.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel data integration6.50 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources5.70 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PlanfulVena
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PlanfulVena
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
6.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PlanfulVena
Likelihood to Recommend
Reporting and Spotlight have changed the game for us. Spotlight has brought dynamic reporting to our team and the rest of the office as well. With dynamic planning, we've spent more time doing analysis instead of running and creating the reports. Recently, we've spent less time analyzing and more time formatting, and Spotlight has brought the analysis back to FP&A.
Read full review
Whether you have processes you are looking to make more efficient or starting from scratch, Vena is a great tool to handle both. When we started with Vena all of reporting was either very manual or frankly nonexistent. Vena was pivotal in bringing us from zero to 10 in a short time. it helped us streamline the process of gathering data to the end reporting
Read full review
Pros
  • Creating forecasts for the month, quarter, and year
  • Creating new variables by using variables pre-defined and that are new in the system
  • Having a very simple setup in the reports section - not straying away from the old Excel model which most people are used to. I can speak for a lot of people when I say that tools that look new can easily be frightening! 😅
Read full review
  • What i like best about Vena is that it is very seamless Excel integration.
  • Vena fosters collabs across teams, helping multiple members to work together on financial planning in real-time enhancing overall efficiency.
  • We now also can automate manual processes like budgeting, consolidation of data and reporting saves my valuable time and also reducing the risk of errors.
Read full review
Cons
  • Dashboarding could be more flexible and easier to use.
  • Dynamic Reporting has room for flexibility with nesting, dimension names showing up instead of “All,” and overall flexibility.
  • Make Analyze view in Spotlight more intuitive.
  • A high-level onboarding guide to understanding the different components of Planful, data flows, and tips & tricks.
Read full review
  • It could improve the ease of implementation; it could take a long for an inexperienced IT team.
  • From the ERP system perspective, it can be linked easily, but it has room for improvement when you make core changes and require a Vena specialist again.
  • Some administrators can get confused while working on Excel implementation; it has complicated technical requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our new Comptroller understands the value of Planful, and we plan to utilize it further in the organization to enhance external reporting. Strangely enough, Planful had not previously been embraced by the former CFO, who argued that we were running two sets of books (of course, we were not). Fortunately, the before mentioned reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income demonstrated that to the banks.
Read full review
It saves me so much time - to go back I would have to hire multiple people to achieve the same results. It is a cost effective tool for our uses and continues to pay for itself in time savings.
Read full review
Usability
The tool is extremely adaptable, and it enables very quick querying to give us opportunity to gain live insights into the business. Given its adaptability, we are also able to create scenario analyses very quickly in rapidly changing environments. The formatting also enables us to provide this information in a very consumable manner.
Read full review
This is split between usability from an end-user perspective and administrative. Administrative - The tool is lacking in a cohesive way to administer the tool, both from more of a back-end perspective (ETL/Integrations, scripting, etc.) as well as from a business administrative (Processes, Models, etc.). On the more back-end IT related aspects, the tool is a mishmash of modules that were clearly developed in stovepipe fashion. Basic feature/functionality aspects such as version control, auto vs manual save, etc. differ between the code preparation components. It is also lacking in any sort of coherent version control. Not all pages display the context information, so extreme caution must be used. There is also no coherent migration strategy. The process and model navigation has been somewhat challenging for our business administrators, often requiring assistance from Vena when creating or altering templates. 2 of 10 End User - This is better. The Excel add-in generally functions well. Creating basic templates is straightforward, and there is a large degree of flexibility when creating reporting templates. Being part of Excel puts many users into a comfort zone. The toggle switch between template and data mode is not well conceived, and the add-in pop-ups occasionally have issues on multi-monitor displays. 6 of 10
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I only give a 9 rating rather than a 10 rating because it seems that every day around 2pm we see a slowdown in the use of Planful. I have requested our internal IT department verify that it is not an internal issue and have been assured it is the tool. We have not yet reached out to Planful to do extensive research to solve this issue.
Read full review
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Read full review
Performance
Again, the system is very reliable and, for the most part, runs very quick and smooth. When running larger queries, it does take some time, and during budgeting season our users experienced slower loading times, but nothing that raises concerns outside of normal network issues. Occasionally, as with any software we use, it will crash and you have to restart, but that does not happen very often.
Read full review
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
Read full review
Support Rating
Sometimes we get great help when using Planful's support team and other times we don't. In particular, there is one person that often responds to our support tickets who is less than helpful, hence the reason for the 5 out of 10 rating. As a result, most of the time we reach out to our Planful consulting group as they provide faster and better support
Read full review
From initiate setup to going live, Vena's customer representatives and technicians have proven to be responsive and enthusiastic in getting our company up and running. They have been patient with our questions and frustrations and worked to troubleshoot issues that have come up.
Read full review
In-Person Training
We got little training on the tool after implementation. Did a lot of "trial by fire" learning about Planful. I don't think RSM really provided us all the details we needed to understand the tool and to know what we needed to train on. I don't know we knew enough about the tool to even ask the right questions and then they left and we used Planful support a lot.
Read full review
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
Read full review
Online Training
This training is much more robust now than it was when we first implemented our Planful environment. Many times we can do a little research in the "help" portal and do not even need to reach out to support. They are continuously improving the training and information available to users.
Read full review
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Most of the issues in the implementation were self inflicted, the team at Top Down was great and did a good job managing hours and teaching our team how to best handle the system. The implementation went longer than expected as they always do but the GL and erp link was up and running quickly so we could build reporting
Read full review
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Personally I have only used essbase in my work. Planful has a much easier platform to use both to put together results and to load data compared to the financial reporting platforms that I have used. Planful also has better dedicated tools to create reports and build in a dedicated software that is built to report on rather than building from scratch in an excel environment
Read full review
Vena Solutions stands out due to its familiar Excel-based interface, making it easy for our team to adopt without extensive training. Compared to alternatives like Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, Vena's strong customer support and efficient automation have significantly reduced our budgeting cycle time. We chose Vena for its seamless integration with our existing systems and substantial time-saving benefits, ultimately enhancing our decision-making process.
Read full review
Scalability
From our experience, Planful is only used in 2 overhead departments in our organization. We easily added another overhead department, but they decided against using Planful for their workforce and financial planning. Removing them from our environment was extremely easy.
Read full review
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has allowed users to view a real-time P&L in a way they weren't able to do with Qlik.
  • Budget to Actual analysis has become much more streamlined and actionable
  • Long-range plan process has been significantly streamlined and a lot of time has been cut out of the process.
Read full review
  • Eliminated the necessity to manually combine multiple Excel budget worksheets into one file in order to compile an org-wide budget
  • Allows end-users to be self-sufficient by having the ability to drill into transaction-level detail and conduct ad-hoc analyses
  • Created more bandwidth in the FP&A team to spend more time on more meaningful analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planful Screenshots

Screenshot of the Planful Planform DashboardScreenshot of Planful for FinanceScreenshot of Planful for MarketingScreenshot of ReportsScreenshot of a Capacity Planning TemplateScreenshot of Integrations

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard