Quest Software's Enterprise Reporter provides visibility into critical Microsoft configurations — from Active Directory and Exchange to Teams and OneDrive for Business. The reporting solution enhances compliance with security best practices and internal policies while helping users ensure compliance with external regulatory mandates, including HIPAA, GDPR, PCI, SOX, and FISMA. And when paired with Quest's Security Explorer, the user can modify permissions from within these reports, to close…
N/A
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…
$1.50
per year per user
Pricing
Quest Enterprise Reporter
Solutions2Share Teams Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
XL: more than 4,000 users
€ 1.50
per year per user
Small: 1 - 249 users
€ 1500
per year
Medium: 250 - 999 users
€ 3780
per year
Large: 1,000 - 4,000 users
€ 6050
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Quest Enterprise Reporter
Teams Manager
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$2,100 one-time fee
Additional Details
—
Information on Enterprise editions and Support packages can be found at the vendor's website.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Quest Enterprise Reporter
Solutions2Share Teams Manager
Considered Both Products
Quest Enterprise Reporter
No answer on this topic
Teams Manager
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Teams Manager
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for …
Our general contractor for the build-out selected MT over Zoom. It was not our choice. Zoom has a bit more movement with background screen images and vid quality but it's all fairly close.
We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our …
As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote.
For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.
It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.
Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)