QuoteWerks vs. Responsive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
QuoteWerks is specialized Configuration Pricing Quoting (CPQ) software that can be used in every industry to create sales quotes and proposals. The vendor’s value proposition is that rather than relying on Microsoft Word or Excel to create quotes, users can benefit from a tool that is specialized for the task of creating quotes and proposals. QuoteWerks integrates with the user's existing CRM software and distributors. With QuoteWerks users can also submit orders…
$15
per user/per month
Responsive
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
QuoteWerksResponsive
Editions & Modules
QuoteWerks Standard Edition
$15
per user/per month
QuoteWerks Professional Edition
$20
per user/per month
QuoteWerks Corporate Edition
$29
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QuoteWerksResponsive
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe QuoteWerks license count is based on concurrent usage so while you may have 5 users using it, you may only need to purchase 2 licenses. The QuoteValet license count is based on daily maximum number of unique users. In addition to monthly and annual subscriptions, one-time, up-front purchasing options for edition and realtime licenses are available which include volume pricing discounts. Invest up-front and pay minor maintenance fees annually. Please contact QuoteWerks Sales at sales@quotewerks.com or 407-248-1481 to answer any questions or to obtain a personalized quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QuoteWerksResponsive
Considered Both Products
QuoteWerks
Chose QuoteWerks
We used to use QwikQuote back in the late 90's and early 2000's. While it was pretty easy to use, it didn't have all the bells and whistles that QuoteWerks has to offer. I don't remember why we stopped using it, but we ended up writing our own quoting software.

The home grown …
Chose QuoteWerks
We used Excel for quoting before finding QuoteWerks. Excel was time-consuming and errors occurred often with bad or broken formulas and then we still had to manually transfer the quote. QuoteWerks has made quoting quick and easy. It has also made converting quotes to orders in …
Chose QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks just seems to make more sense for this application than the others. They are great CRM's but they can be quite limited in functionality when it comes to actual quotes, breakdowns, and totals. They leave you pretty much doing it manually, and because of that, …
Chose QuoteWerks
Zomentum is slightly more "friendly" looking but, not as widely used by industries, therefore not as useful. QuoteWerks has more hard features and many that I don't use but would be useful to bigger or more hard users. QuoteWerks could do with a light version for simplified …
Chose QuoteWerks
The major reason to go with the QuoteWerks was due to pricing as compared to its competitors which involves the production of the sales made easy as well as easy to use in order to work on the production and cloud migration made easy in order to go with it and resolve the …
Chose QuoteWerks
Both this software were similar in what they do and pricing, however, the QuoteWork software in my opinion does a better job recording and tracking communications between personnel and clients. QuoteWerks also gives a lot of data that might seem like overkill, but having too …
Chose QuoteWerks
While I was not a part of the decision-making in either of these tools, I believe QuoteWerks gave us the ability to work with a broader audience than BlueSnap.
Chose QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks is extremely robust. Its CPQ is what attracted me to it, especially since it can read MS Access and MS SQL Server databases. We connected it with Infinity so we could quote our inventory in real-time.
Chose QuoteWerks
We have used several other quoting methods and none are as efficient. The fact that the software is installed locally and not a cloud only product makes quote entry much faster.
Chose QuoteWerks
Our primary alternative was to create our own quoting database using Microsoft Access. QuoteWerks is basically an better version of what we could have built.
Chose QuoteWerks
I have been working with QuoteWerks so long the last things I used were Word and Excel for making quotes for customers and this is hands down better than either of those.
Chose QuoteWerks
At the time that we selected QuoteWerks there was not quoting software "married" to ConnectWise. We viewed both products and since the products were very similar we chose the product that more closely fit our budget. QuoteWerks fit the bill.
Chose QuoteWerks
Both software options have different strengths. I prefer QuoteWerks for how easy it is to customize a quote and add in appropriate discounts, as well as having multiple quotes per account. I prefer Drawloop because it's embedded into Salesforce. Drawloop takes much longer to …
Chose QuoteWerks
The price point and licensing model was better than Quosal. That was one of the main deciding factors because based on the demos/webinars many of the features were the same.
Chose QuoteWerks
I used Netsuite a number if years ago and it was nowhere near as good. It was slow, cumbersome, and if your Internet connection burped for a moment you lost everything - no sessions persistence + no autosave was not a good combination. There was also no usable import tool. …
Chose QuoteWerks
It's a better value for money and does the same thing as the much more expensive competitor...
Chose QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks is a lot less expensive and easy to customize. We chose QuoteWerks based on price and reviews. We also chose QuoteWerks based on the customer service of the sales associate. You seem to get lost in the system with CNET.
Chose QuoteWerks
We elected to go with QuoteWerks due to it's lower total cost. ConnectWise sell would have been markedly more costly for us to allow our entire team to use it when it is uncommon for more than one of us to be using it at a time.
Chose QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks maybe a little less user-friendly than ConnectWise Sell, however, the price is much less and we felt we didn't need anything different. One of the features in Connectwise Sell was that you could send to a customer for auto approval, but we rarely need to do that for …
Chose QuoteWerks
Quotewerks is like its name, it's really good at making quotes and making sure you are quoting competitively sourced IT goods. The other things like full CRM, full PSA, full accounting, will require you to buy something else in addition. so you get this functionality. It's also …
Chose QuoteWerks
We have reviewed Quosal (ConnectWise Sell). The quoting process is better on looking pretty, but it has a multitude of flaws that done help with accomplishing what actually needs to happen. QuoteWerks accomplishes anything that we need it to do, and if it's short on those …
Chose QuoteWerks
I haven't evaluated any other products. I am just the user.
Responsive
Chose Responsive
Responsive has better UI and pricing
Chose Responsive
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly …
Chose Responsive
RFPIO's licensing model is a bit different from others which worked better for our organization. Rather than licensing by a number of users, it's licensed by the active project. This allows us to add multiple users that are responsible for reviewing and updating content without …
Chose Responsive
Unfortunately, I have not had the opportunity to use or evaluate other products like RFPIO. When I was hired, my company had just purchased our RFPIO software.
Chose Responsive
I greatly prefer RFPIO over Loopio. It's a much cleaner interface and the searchable library is amazing.
Chose Responsive
We are a small proposal team, with a large group of resources who support our responses. RFPIO is easy to use for internal and external users, doesn't require extensive onboarding for new users, and is constantly adding new capabilities and enhancements to make the product even …
Chose Responsive
Qvidian, as I remember it, was clunky and difficult to use. Not user friendly at all.
Chose Responsive
I have not seen another tool in the market that is collaborative or intuitive. Those features are very impressive.
Chose Responsive
I've only used RFPIO to compile responses to RFPs, and I've only used Scout RFP to respond to RFPs issued within Scout (i.e., the customer sent us an RFP without Scout RFP and asked the response and all communication to go through Scout RFP).

As such, I've used two tools, but …
Chose Responsive
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not …
Chose Responsive
  • RFP360 - We used this tool for three years and it was a great first step/upgrade from a searchable Google doc. We decided to start evaluating other systems for a couple of reasons:
    • RFP360 is an end-to-end tool for RFP requestors and responders. We felt they were more focused on …
Features
QuoteWerksResponsive
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
QuoteWerks
9.3
Ratings
7% above category average
Responsive
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product configuration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration options9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing rules9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Price adjustment9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Order capturing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
QuoteWerks
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Proposal branding00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Proposal templates00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
QuoteWerks
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
QuoteWerks
-
Ratings
Responsive
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Proposal distribution00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Interactive proposals00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QuoteWerksResponsive
Small Businesses
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Sales Cloud
SAP Sales Cloud
Score 8.3 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QuoteWerksResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
QuoteWerksResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
The sales department is satisfied with QuoteWerks and this generates satisfaction throughout the company. The main recommendation is to use the free trial first in order to know what the goals of each company are according to their size and futuristic vision. QuoteWerks opening easy and robust integration with our CRMs, this also improves workflow. It works as an electronic signature that has improved working time and in general the relationship with our clients because we no longer have to ask the client to print the document and then sign it.
Read full review
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
  • Organize product data, costing, pricing and images in one central location
  • Quickly prepare and disseminate quotes
  • Time saved is redirected to other business management activities
  • Interface with Act! CRM keeps quotes organized by customer
  • Tech support is excellent for the few times I have had to contact them
Read full review
  • Import/export - the configurations during import and export are invaluable. This saves us so much time during export with the amount of things we have pre-formatted. Additionally, this tool can handle export into native formats OR customized templates for Word, Excel, and PDF. This means we can export into Excel from outside tools, as well as utilize client/broker formats when needed - without minimal copy/paste (RFP friends... can I get an amen??)
  • Auto-response - once a questionnaire is uploaded, the system can auto-respond based on past responses. It gets smarter over time as more responses are in the system. We find this picks up 25-40% on the low end and 90% on the high end (especially when we are responding to the same broker or consultant who has their preferred template)
  • Keyword Field Mapping - the system allows you to map fields into your export template as well as your responses. The system auto maps these when exporting. We use this feature a lot to map salesperson info (custom fields for the stuff we want on the cover sheet/letter), client name, client nickname (the company, the client, the City, the County, etc.). This makes it easy to have customized responses without extra effort on our side.
  • Guest Question Authors - the system allows you to send single questions to guest users easily so that they can answer via a web browser on a computer or laptop without signing in. I also particularly like that I can track it as a comment which helps me go back later and find my open items.
Read full review
Cons
  • The data structure that is required to set up the "price books" behind the scenes is a little cumbersome until you learn how to do it and practice.
  • The sync function for the data is sometimes a little slow in the Standard and Professional editions because of the Access back-end. The Corporate edition uses a MS SQL back-end and is better.
Read full review
  • For questions that contain generalized words, the ability to pinpoint better responses with AI.
  • As an end user, I always start with the Answers tab. It would be nice for RFPIO to open on the Answers tab, because I always go there first (learn my preferences).
  • It would be nice to have guided paths the first time I open after new enhancements have been added.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We will renew because QuoteWerks has all the capabilities we require for our business processes and our reps like it. The support is top notch and the pricing model saves us considerable money over SaaS models. I also feel confident that Aspire Technologies will continue to improve and add features
Read full review
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
Usability
Our company's experience with Quotewerks has been position and we have continued to look at other solutions to make sure we are not missing something, however for the pricing structure for what we use, makes it the right solution for our business.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
QuoteWerks is a very stable, robust solution. In my experience: bugs in the software are rare; any crashes or system failures are usually due to other infrastructure issues rather than the software itself, i.e. a problem with the network or server, an issue with a.n.other piece of software on the User's workstation that has a knock-on effect on QuoteWerks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Once set up and running, and particularly when running the more reliable, faster Corporate edition rehosted to SQL Server, then QuoteWerks performs very well. The only reason for the slight mark down here is that QuoteWerks is very sensetive to having a database connection. If there is an issue whereby the connection to the server is lost (network glitch for example) then whereas Outlook (or a.n.other piece of software) might just wait and poll in 30 seconds time, QuoteWerks will crash and potentially a User lose all changes to the document(s) that they were working on.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Quotewerks Support and the UK Distributor here have always been responsive to our requests and in particular helped us out when we need some new functionality which then got added in the next build...this really impressed me and showed that where case was made, they readily embraced it and the new build was completed within 60 days.
Read full review
The response time and attitude from the RFPIO team is extraordinary. I always feel like I am their only customer - that's how exemplary their customer service is! When we have a suggestion, it is addressed and escalated - ultimately it is resolved to meet (and exceed!) our expectations. The RFPIO team works collaboratively with us, coaching us on new features until we can use them with confidence. Webinars. User conferences. Clear and useable communication. Every method of "training up" is leveraged so that users can feel comfortable and are successful using the tool. AMAZING!
Read full review
In-Person Training
There is in-person training offered in Orlando, but our company did not want to spend the money.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Originally it was weak, but they have really stepped up.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I do not have any key insights on the implementation so I cannot provide any valuable information here. I do know, however, that the process went well when we switched from a old platform to a new hyperconverged solution to host Quotewerks. It seemed to be a quick process and our engineer was able to do so almost seamlessly.
Read full review
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Both this software were similar in what they do and pricing, however, the QuoteWork software in my opinion does a better job recording and tracking communications between personnel and clients. QuoteWerks also gives a lot of data that might seem like overkill, but having too much information is better than too little.
Read full review
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not charged per user like many other RFP automation solutions. This makes the price much more scalable and also allows for creative engineering as far as use of the system
Read full review
Scalability
We've implemented QuoteWerks in both micro ("one man band") businesses as well as much larger organisations. With QuoteWerks Corporate editions option to host the backend database on SQL Server (a very powerful and scaleable database platform) it's possible to work effectively with QuoteWerks in an organisation with many 100 Users. The flexibility of the product also lends itself very well to evolving with a growing business and having various individual user configurations to help them work best with the software in their individual role in the organisation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Quotewerks has allowed us to improve the accuracy and speed in which we are able to generate and deliver a quote.
  • Quotewerks has improved the overall consistency and appearance of our quotes.
  • Quotewerks has allowed us to prevent costly pricing mistakes based on stale data or price lists.
Read full review
  • Our response time has gone from 2 weeks, to around 24hrs of addressing an RFP
  • We have seen considerable savings with reallocated headcount and reduced effort spent on other critical areas
  • Our previous process had a blind spot when it came to visibility. Now we have 100% visibility across the organization.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QuoteWerks Screenshots

Screenshot of An example of a QuoteWerks Proposal