| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 PandaDoc | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
 Qwilr | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients. | $39 per month |
| PandaDoc | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | Qwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose PandaDoc We also evaluated a product called "Better Proposals" that's not in the TrustRadius list. Pandadoc won our business by virtue of having generally more flexible design and layout abilities. There are a lot of new contenders in the space of proposal/contract creation and … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose PandaDoc PandaDoc has much better CRM integration. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| PandaDoc | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal Creation & Organization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Collaboration & Workflow |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Delivery |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.1 | 9.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 | - |
| Configurability | 2.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 | - |
