RabbitMQ vs. Software AG Universal Messaging

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
RabbitMQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
RabbitMQ, an open source message broker, is part of Pivotal Software, a VMware company acquired in 2019, and supports message queue, multiple messaging protocols, and more. RabbitMQ is available open source, however VMware also offers a range of commercial services for RabbitMQ; these are available as part of the Pivotal App Suite.N/A
Software AG Universal Messaging
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Software AG Universal Messaging is presented as a single solution for high-performance, low-latency messaging across a wide array of delivery channels, including all mainstream enterprise, web and mobile platforms. The venodr states that for the enterprise, Software AG Universal Messaging delivers high throughput messaging for resilient, secure and highly scalable applications. For web and mobile, Software AG Universal Messaging was designed to provide real-time streaming to the edge of…N/A
Pricing
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Considered Both Products
RabbitMQ
Chose RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ has a few advantages over Azure Service Bus
1) RMQ handles substantially larger files - ASB tops out at 100MB, we use RabbitMQfor files over 200MB
2) RabbitMQ can be easily setup on prem - Azure Service Bus is cloud only
Chose RabbitMQ
It is very easy to use as it has a simple function to connect and use RabbitMQ.
It is having Fast Learning curve, Any newbies can learn it in a week or month. It is having proper documentation, we are able to find all the details about its functionality and usage of it.
The …
Chose RabbitMQ
I have not used other products other than a roll-your-own solution. The Selection of RabbitMQ was made before I began working on the project but I was able to leverage it well without making major changes to the existing apps. This was particularly helpful in lowering risks. I …
Chose RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ cannot resend messages like Apache Kafka but it seems to have the lowest latency in messages.
Chose RabbitMQ
For basic use cases, SQS is way easy to deploy and maintain compared to RabbitMQ. RabbitMQ can cover a lot more use-cases but actually, we did not face specific scenarios that make it necessary to come back to RabbitMQ.
Chose RabbitMQ
It is just better documented and seems a better fit given that is done using erlang. PubSub+ low level approach seems unsafe. They work with custom hardware whereas Pivotal RabbitMQ seem a better fit for generic hardware (cloud).
Chose RabbitMQ
Honestly, though we're still trying out Kafka and Pulsar, I'd go with them for message broker and as traffic buffers. We are only still using RabbitMQ because it's hard to transition off after writing tons of code custom-built for RabbitMQ. Kafka is better because it's way more …
Chose RabbitMQ
None of the options in the list are really similar products. We use Apache Camel in conjunction with RabbitMQ and we also use Oracle Integration Cloud and WSO2 for messaging. Integration Cloud is SaaS-based and low code, so it's drastically different in that regard. WS02 is …
Software AG Universal Messaging
Chose Software AG Universal Messaging
Software AG Universal Messaging has excellent performance characteristics, a good high availability story, and works great when you are using the other products in the Software AG webMethods integration platform, as our organization is. It has relatively high licensing costs, …
Best Alternatives
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
RabbitMQSoftware AG Universal Messaging
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are looking for a message broker, RabbitMQ is pretty good. Its API lets you create tons of queues on demand and publish to all of them at once, while you can have 10+ consumers on each queue. It also does a good job of absorbing bursts of traffic. We've seen our queues get backed up to 3 million messages with no problem. In the modern era of GDPR, you may run into problems with keeping messages encrypted out of the box in-flight and at-rest with RabbitMQ. Not saying it's impossible, but it's tough to set up and you have to pay a high overload.
Read full review
Software AG Universal Messaging is best used in conjunction with Software AG webMethods integration platform, as it works seamlessly with other components of that platform such as webMethods Integration Server and webMethods Trading Networks. It can be used with any messaging client developed in Java or .NET and supports JMS clients, however, it is best suited to being used as one component in an organization that is going to implement the entire webMethods platform to implement their Enterprise Service Bus integration solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • What RabbitMQ does well is what it's advertised to do. It is good at providing lots of high volume, high availability queue. We've seen it handle upwards of 10 million messages in its queues, spread out over 200 queues before its publish/consume rates dipped. So yeah, it can definitely handle a lot of messages and a lot of queues. Depending on the size of the machine RabbitMQ is running on, I'm sure it can handle more.
  • Decent number of plugins! Want a plugin that gives you an interface to view all the queues and see their publish/consume rates? Yes, there's one for that. Want a plugin to "shovel" messages from one queue to another in an emergency? Check. Want a plugin that does extra logging for all the messages received? Got you covered!
  • Lots of configuration possibilities. We've tuned over 100 settings over the past year to get the performance and reliability just right. This could be a downside though--it's pretty confusing and some settings were hard to understand.
Read full review
  • Low latency high performance messaging and event handling
  • High availability
  • Horizontal scalability
  • Seamless integration with Software AG webMethods integration platform
Read full review
Cons
  • It breaks communication if we don't acknowledge early. In some cases our work items are time consuming that will take a time and in that scenario we are getting errors that RabbitMQ broke the channel. It will be good if RabbitMQ provides two acknowledgements, one is for that it has been received at client side and second ack is client is completed the processing part.
Read full review
  • Logging
  • Administration
  • Observability
Read full review
Usability
RabbitMQ is very usable if you are a programmer or DevOps engineer. You can setup and configure a messaging system without any programmatic knowledge either through an admin console plugin or through a command-line interface. It's very easy to spin up additional consumers when volume is heavy and it's very easy to manage those consumers either through automated scripting or through their admin console. Because it's language agnostic it integrates with any system supporting AMQP.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I gave it a 10 but we do not have a support contract with any company for RabbitMQ so there is no official support in that regard. However, there is a community and questions asked on StackOverflow or any other major question and answer site will usually get a response.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is very easy to use as it has a simple function to connect and use RabbitMQ. It is having Fast Learning curve, Any newbies can learn it in a week or month. It is having proper documentation, we are able to find all the details about its functionality and usage of it. The Features of RabbitMQ are providing are matching with our business requirements.
Read full review
Software AG Universal Messaging has excellent performance characteristics, a good high availability story, and works great when you are using the other products in the Software AG webMethods integration platform, as our organization is. It has relatively high licensing costs, which is a large negative when compared with open-source solutions such as Apache Kafka. However, Software AG provides good support services, and is a market leader in the integration space, giving some surety for risk-averse organizations that if something goes wrong we have a vendor we can rely on to help fix it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Earlier we had a problem with missing work items with our own implementation but later using RabbitMQ is solved a problem. Now our job processing mechanism is highly reliable.
  • We also had a problem with scaling, processing 1k work items per second. RabbitMQ helped us to scale well with increasing work items.
Read full review
  • Enables disparate software systems to be integrated, reducing manual data entry
  • Enables high performance event handling for data lakes and analytics
  • Has relatively high licensing costs
Read full review
ScreenShots