Ranorex Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

Tricentis Tosca

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Ranorex Studio	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	Over 14,000+ users worldwide automate tests with Ranorex Studio, which promises to enable rapid delivery of high-quality desktop, mobile, and web applications. The vendor says that with over 10 years in test automation, Ranorex Studio supports automating functional UI tests for even the most challenging technologies, from legacy applications to the latest web and mobile platforms. Ranorex Studio is an all-in-one tool that empowers everyone on the team. Key benefits and…	$890 per additional endpoint
Tricentis Tosca	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…	N/A

Pricing

Ranorex Studio

Tricentis Tosca

Editions & Modules

Runtime Floating Licnse: $890
per additional endpoint
Premium Node-Locked License: $2,990
per installation
Premium Floating License: $4,990
per concurrent user

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Ranorex Studio	Tricentis Tosca
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

All licenses are perpetual and include 12 months of maintenance and email support. A runtime floating license requires at least one premium license for test creation. Please contact our sales team for information about possible volume discounts and options for enterprise support. Consulting, integration and training services are available from our partners worldwide.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Ranorex Studio	Tricentis Tosca
Considered Both Products	Ranorex Studio Verified User Anonymous Chose Ranorex Studio TestComplete Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Ranorex Studio We have used Selenium as well. This has picked up more steam than Ranorex if i have to be honest. Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Tosca Sushmita Patil Senior Business Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Depending on the prices concern and fast execution Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports … Incentivized Helpful? juan eng paw Senior Technical Manager SA Chose Tricentis Tosca UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions Incentivized Helpful? Yogendra Singh Test Automation Expert Chose Tricentis Tosca As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite … Incentivized Helpful? AB Atanu Biswas Automation and Performance Test Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and ACCELQ Incentivized Helpful? Mouleeswaran Andi E Test Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. … Incentivized Helpful? Anant Joshi Sr. Director Chose Tricentis Tosca The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sneha Gangan Manore Senior Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports … Incentivized Helpful? Ganesh Muralidharan Global Delivery Head Chose Tricentis Tosca Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing. Incentivized Helpful? BW Bernd Weigl Teamleiter Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis Tosca Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever! Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Software Engineer Chose Tricentis Tosca As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation. Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide … Incentivized Helpful? Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Chose Tricentis Tosca Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is better as the first testing tool to introduce in a news organization. I believe it's the testing tool that is the easiest to introduce and adopt. It is oriented toward manual testers that would like to start automation but it is less oriented toward … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Mostly the ease of use from day one by introducing the no-code approach for teams with non-technical contributors. Also, the amount of technologies it covers is greater than other tools that are specialized in web-only or API, for example. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has more functionality and is easier to implement. It also has more compatibility with other applications, and the support is much more responsive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca is an easy to use tool which can apply to almost any business process. The customer support program appears to be a program which will put the use of the tool on track with our protfolios. Ease of implementation and total application capabilities across … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca I have really minimum exposure with QTP and ALM, barely 2 months or so, for this reason I would not like to comment on how Tosca stacks up against them, but something that I really like about Selenium is that it is really simple and easy to setup, doesn't require a heavy … Incentivized Helpful? Raghuram Rangamani Associate Project Manager Chose Tricentis Tosca Before going in for TOSCA we tried to use Selenium / UFT. But TOSCA stacked much ahead than other tools. Incentivized Helpful? DL david leo Developer Chose Tricentis Tosca Its easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliable Its easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and reliableIts easy to use and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Ranorex Studio

Tricentis Tosca

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Ranorex Studio 6.4 Ratings 23% below category average	Tricentis Tosca - Ratings
Centralized test management	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	5.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Test execution reporting	4.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Defect management	7.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Automation Testing

Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
	Ranorex Studio - Ratings	Tricentis Tosca 8.3 Ratings 2% below category average
Record and Automate	00 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Mobile Testing	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Test Scheduling	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Test Management	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Parallel Testing	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Object Recognition	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Real Device Testing	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Ranorex Studio	Tricentis Tosca
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 8.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 8.0 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Ranorex Studio	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	1.0 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	3.5 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.0 (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Ranorex Studio	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	Although the first year with Ranorex was fine and increased our productivity overall, the first problem that appeared after the standard support period expired gave the whole cooperation a bad taste. Apart from the fact that if you don't buy support continuously and the problem appears after a year and a half, for example, you have to buy support for the whole past period just to get someone to talk to you, after buying support and reporting the problem it took them half a year to even get to the problem analysis during which we were without a working application. Several times we had to tediously report the same problem over and over again as we were shuffled around by support teams who had no continuity for our support case. And when our support expired again for a period during which we could not use the program, Ranorex referred us to another support purchase, still without a working solution. This is totally unacceptable and definitely not a pro-customer approach. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis Tosca is well suited for packaged applications like SAP, Salesforce, Workday, etc. It also works well with API testing and Web UI testing. Tosca is highly suited for Projects which require a high level of collaboration between team members across different locations. It's less suited for mobile automation, Reporting, and test scenarios with high input data. Incentivized Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Read full review
Pros	Initial setup. User guide. Getting money from customers. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tosca provides a one-stop solution for your test-automation needs. One can use it to automate testing of desktop (web/stand-alone) applications, Mobile(Native as well as Web) applications etc. It is a great tool since it not only helps in test automation but also in maintaining a suite for Manual testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Language support is limited, c# and Vb.net only if i remember correctly compared to other tools which allow many more. This addition would certainly be appreciated if added on in a company like mine with a variety of differently skilled individuals Paid license. This is not always preferred. A free version without a limited trial but maybe limited features would be appreciated. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue Incentivized AI Alexandru Cristian Ion QA Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	I suppose my experience is sort of mixed. Help documents are substantially helpful. I personally have not got the quickest responses from Ranorex support but at the same time, they are pretty good with updating their users frequently with info about their product/s and features. The community is really where I find support and I suppose that could look to be an extension of the product itself. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
In-Person Training	No answers on this topic	It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Online Training	No answers on this topic	okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	We have used Selenium as well. This has picked up more steam than Ranorex if i have to be honest. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Reducing testing time is directly saving money if time is considered money. Allowing less skilled users the ability to automate testing from the get-go because of Ranorex's ease of use and G.U.I. This of course positively affects a project and assists with user upskilling passively at least. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time. Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad. With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Ranorex Studio Screenshots	Tricentis Tosca Screenshots