Responsive vs. Templafy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Responsive
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Templafy
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Templafy is a document management solution from the company of the same name in Copenhagen, featuring templates with dynamic personalization, automated population of templates with brand content, email signature management, document assembly workflow, and other features.N/A
Pricing
ResponsiveTemplafy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ResponsiveTemplafy
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ResponsiveTemplafy
Considered Both Products
Responsive
Chose Responsive
Responsive has better UI and pricing
Chose Responsive
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly …
Chose Responsive
RFPIO's licensing model is a bit different from others which worked better for our organization. Rather than licensing by a number of users, it's licensed by the active project. This allows us to add multiple users that are responsible for reviewing and updating content without …
Chose Responsive
Unfortunately, I have not had the opportunity to use or evaluate other products like RFPIO. When I was hired, my company had just purchased our RFPIO software.
Chose Responsive
I greatly prefer RFPIO over Loopio. It's a much cleaner interface and the searchable library is amazing.
Chose Responsive
We are a small proposal team, with a large group of resources who support our responses. RFPIO is easy to use for internal and external users, doesn't require extensive onboarding for new users, and is constantly adding new capabilities and enhancements to make the product even …
Chose Responsive
Qvidian, as I remember it, was clunky and difficult to use. Not user friendly at all.
Chose Responsive
I have not seen another tool in the market that is collaborative or intuitive. Those features are very impressive.
Chose Responsive
I've only used RFPIO to compile responses to RFPs, and I've only used Scout RFP to respond to RFPs issued within Scout (i.e., the customer sent us an RFP without Scout RFP and asked the response and all communication to go through Scout RFP).

As such, I've used two tools, but …
Chose Responsive
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not …
Chose Responsive
  • RFP360 - We used this tool for three years and it was a great first step/upgrade from a searchable Google doc. We decided to start evaluating other systems for a couple of reasons:
    • RFP360 is an end-to-end tool for RFP requestors and responders. We felt they were more focused on …
Templafy
Chose Templafy
We went went templafy for the ease of set up, still in our first year but looking to see how it stacks up once we want to integrate with salesforce. We wanted the ability to customize and templafy offered more options than others.
Features
ResponsiveTemplafy
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Templafy
-
Ratings
Proposal branding8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal templates5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Templafy
-
Ratings
RFP management & response8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Templafy
-
Ratings
Proposal distribution8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive proposals8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ResponsiveTemplafy
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Coda by Grammarly
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Coda by Grammarly
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
Coda by Grammarly
Coda by Grammarly
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ResponsiveTemplafy
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ResponsiveTemplafy
Likelihood to Recommend
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Great use case for TEmplafy is when you have a lot of assets in a system, that you want to be able to slice and dice and export a custom report of what is meaningful to you. They are set up so you can make selections to only surface what you need and feel very well served. It is not ideal, at this time, if you want to look at many separate systems and merge them all. It requires a lot of work to customize and tailor to fit this more curated need
Read full review
Pros
  • Import/export - the configurations during import and export are invaluable. This saves us so much time during export with the amount of things we have pre-formatted. Additionally, this tool can handle export into native formats OR customized templates for Word, Excel, and PDF. This means we can export into Excel from outside tools, as well as utilize client/broker formats when needed - without minimal copy/paste (RFP friends... can I get an amen??)
  • Auto-response - once a questionnaire is uploaded, the system can auto-respond based on past responses. It gets smarter over time as more responses are in the system. We find this picks up 25-40% on the low end and 90% on the high end (especially when we are responding to the same broker or consultant who has their preferred template)
  • Keyword Field Mapping - the system allows you to map fields into your export template as well as your responses. The system auto maps these when exporting. We use this feature a lot to map salesperson info (custom fields for the stuff we want on the cover sheet/letter), client name, client nickname (the company, the client, the City, the County, etc.). This makes it easy to have customized responses without extra effort on our side.
  • Guest Question Authors - the system allows you to send single questions to guest users easily so that they can answer via a web browser on a computer or laptop without signing in. I also particularly like that I can track it as a comment which helps me go back later and find my open items.
Read full review
  • Simple user interface to make choices and see results
  • Puts the power of customization in the users hand
  • Quick set up and powerful
Read full review
Cons
  • For questions that contain generalized words, the ability to pinpoint better responses with AI.
  • As an end user, I always start with the Answers tab. It would be nice for RFPIO to open on the Answers tab, because I always go there first (learn my preferences).
  • It would be nice to have guided paths the first time I open after new enhancements have been added.
Read full review
  • Customized interface to fit more with a brand or style
  • Web interface and not being dependent on microsoft software
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The response time and attitude from the RFPIO team is extraordinary. I always feel like I am their only customer - that's how exemplary their customer service is! When we have a suggestion, it is addressed and escalated - ultimately it is resolved to meet (and exceed!) our expectations. The RFPIO team works collaboratively with us, coaching us on new features until we can use them with confidence. Webinars. User conferences. Clear and useable communication. Every method of "training up" is leveraged so that users can feel comfortable and are successful using the tool. AMAZING!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not charged per user like many other RFP automation solutions. This makes the price much more scalable and also allows for creative engineering as far as use of the system
Read full review
We went went templafy for the ease of set up, still in our first year but looking to see how it stacks up once we want to integrate with Salesforce. We wanted the ability to customize and templafy offered more options than others
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our response time has gone from 2 weeks, to around 24hrs of addressing an RFP
  • We have seen considerable savings with reallocated headcount and reduced effort spent on other critical areas
  • Our previous process had a blind spot when it came to visibility. Now we have 100% visibility across the organization.
Read full review
  • Reduces search hours by half
Read full review
ScreenShots