Salesforce CMS vs. RWS Tridion Sites

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Salesforce CMS
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization (formerly Salesforce CMS) is a hybrid CMS allowing users to author content once and deliver it anywhere, in or out of Salesforce. Users create content, define content access, and define channels so they can share content and limit access to appropriate contributors. For an experience built with Salesforce, users can choose from two of the company's “what-you-see-is-what-you-get” (WYSIWYG) tools: Experience Builder and Commerce Page Designer. If the user…N/A
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…N/A
Pricing
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Considered Both Products
Salesforce CMS
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce CMS is by far more capable to be tailored towards the need and critical aspects based on how our org is structured and work.

Integrations are also great! Critical data is easily being synced with other tools in tech stack.
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce is magnificently more robust and functions much better when managing complex sales cycles with multiple individuals and products. With simple sales cycles and few products, Excel is a strong contender.
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce CMS stacks up as a Customer management system because it has a more user friendly snd intuitive interface. The UX is better and more modern. It can be customised and extended. There are always learning opportunities and updates for the system so it keeps on …
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce CMS is way better with both optimization and reporting both of which Sonar Scheduling lacked. Our ability to skill technician or prioritize was lacking with Sonar. The API was very delayed with Sonar so changes on the Gantt had a delay that would throw off other team …
Chose Salesforce CMS
I did not make the decision to use Salesforce. However, I am happy with its current implementation to manage our employees.
Chose Salesforce CMS
This fits into the mold with the other Salesforce services. Once you get used to the suite and the nuances of each platform, things become easy. Just read any documentation first, as jumping in will only get you so far, and the more connections with the other apps, the more …
Chose Salesforce CMS
We have only used Salesforce CMS in our organizations as we already use Salesforce CRM for sales, marketing and other purposes
Chose Salesforce CMS
Hubspot CSM is a bit easier to use, but not as strong for bigger markets like enterprise. Also, it's a bit annoying having to log into different platforms. Being able to do everything directly in Salesforce is pretty nice.
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce more so compliments these products, rather than stacks against them. We don't have any products similar to Salesforce CMS, so in lieu of that, these are the products we were using that mesh the easiest with Salesforce CMS in terms of proceeding through the …
Chose Salesforce CMS
In my opinion, Salesforce CMS is the most complex of these offerings, and probably the most complex platform of its kind. It was selected by another stakeholder - I would likely have chosen something less expensive and more intuitive to use. The robust feature set is amazing, …
Chose Salesforce CMS
Salesforce CMS is way beyond the other tools in its performamce also
Chose Salesforce CMS
This is really the first time we had a platform such as SF, so we have nothing to which to compare it.
Chose Salesforce CMS
We used the Catalyst product of Totango. It was not great as it was hard to navigate, and it did not offer any reporting capabilities at all, nor did it speed up our day-to-day tasks.
Chose Salesforce CMS
As our business heavily relies on Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, and Marketing Cloud, we need a CMS that works natively with our existing Salesforce Data. Other platforms would require third-party connectors or custom API development, making integration more complex and expensive. …
Chose Salesforce CMS
Works well with others and I like the newer deployments which continue to make it even more useful and promotes efficiency and transparency.
Chose Salesforce CMS
Does everything I need in one place, so I don't have to use anything else, it integrates with everything I need as well.
Chose Salesforce CMS
I would say Zoho seemed very remedial when compares with the functionality of Salesforce CMS. Zoho might be better for those just starting out and don't need the full functionality of what Salesforce CMS is capable of. Used Zoho at a previous employment and I didn't think it …
Chose Salesforce CMS
I was uninvolved in my organization's CMS selection, but I used Freshdesk at another organization and generally prefer Salesforce CMS due to greater functionality and wider use cases. Unlike Freshdesk, Salesforce CMS is built for processes besides customer support ticketing, …
Chose Salesforce CMS
I have not researched other products. The last two companies I have worked for both used Salesforce CMS and had no intention of changing providers. I cannot think of a time where someone told me they did not like Salesforce CMS. When you have a solid solution like Salesforce …
Chose Salesforce CMS
Our company left Salesforce CMS for PipeDrive due to pricing for licenses.
Chose Salesforce CMS
Pulls data from Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, and Marketing Cloud to dynamically update content, we didn't want to use too many 3rd party tools that would expose our busines to threats
Chose Salesforce CMS
I used to use WebWave at my previous firm and felt like it was more for website creation rather than content sharing internally. I was also in a different role so I meant my needs at my last firm. My focus has changed and now Salesforce CMS is the best product for my team to …
Chose Salesforce CMS
Integration between the two is easy and superb
Chose Salesforce CMS
Integration with this tool are immensely incredible it make us efficient whenever we need to see the data of our client. It helps us to make our lives easier in terms of sending rates, follow-ups, Outbound call and more importantly constant assurance that we have our process on …
RWS Tridion Sites
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Interwoven teamsites, Documentum, Adobe - teamsites and documentum are old and limited. Adobe rocks but I like where I am and Tridion does a lot of the same things. No need to reinvent the wheel or move to a lateral product.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a …
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Tridion is much better for multi-site installations, though Sitecore is a bit easier for content editors to know content types are being used based on visual icon indicators. We've had content editors pick the wrong templates by accident, but Sitecore's visual indicator …
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Adobe CQ is SDL Tridion main competitor. Sitecore is designed for smaller companys. Adobe CQ is all java and thus has limitations. Sitecore is also all .net and has limitations. Both use a dynamic model and everything is compiled at runtime. SDL Tridion can be published in a …
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Tridion again seemed to be more enterprise level then EpiServer, EpiServer allowed for faster ramp up time of a intuitive .NET framework, but Tridion seemed to have more tools and overall functionality once the CMS was customized towards the needs of the customer.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
I did not play a role in selecting this product so I can't say how it stacked up. I do know that Tridion is an improvement over the last CMS.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
I feel that SDL Tridion's User Interface is to difficult for content authors to understand. I worked with a client that used Tridion for years and she still would get lost in the UI and had to ask questions. There was close to 30% of continual time spent on the project simply …
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
SDL Tridion is far superior to CommonSpot. It is much more user friendly and increases efficiency.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
I believe the biggest selling factor for SDL was its customer service and it ability to be responsive. We knew that it was a company that was going to be around for a long time and would continue to provide the support that we would need in the long term.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Tridion's strength is really hosting multiple websites across development, test stage and production.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
The decision to purchase Tridion was made at a corporate level removed from the technical teams. Against our previous open source solution, this has been wildly expensive, impossible to find experienced developers for, and has required completely retooling our organization.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
SDL has a better API and also handles high server load much better. Also, the built-in integrations for translations are more suited for performing lots of translations for many sites. However, Umbraco, like Tridion, has a great community and finding solutions with both …
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
We didn't chose WordPress because can't handle the traffic we generate. Sitecore is what we are currently looking at and it looks like a much better alternative to Tridion.
Chose RWS Tridion Sites
Adobe does a great job in managing sites. Its user interface for authors is intuitive and leaps and bounds better than SDL Tridions new 2013 UI. The ease of install and management makes Adobe CQ a much better product. However, Adobe CQ (AEM) has limitations. It cannot scale as …
Features
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce CMS
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce CMS
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
Ratings
18% above category average
API10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce CMS
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
Ratings
10% above category average
WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Admin section10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page templates10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Library of website themes10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form generator10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce CMS
10.0
Ratings
31% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
7.6
Ratings
3% above category average
Content taxonomy10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
SEO support10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Bulk management10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Community / comment management10.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Storyblok
Storyblok
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText Web CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Salesforce CMSRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
If you have a large customer base and a large amount of data on each of your customers, it is really strong in creating personalized content that your salespeople can use in their pitch meetings—and then setting up workflows for automated for lifecycle journey creations to automatically go out to customers.
Read full review
SDL Tridion works well for organizations with a large website with a lot of content to continuously create and manage. The use of page templates and component presentations makes creating new pages fairly straightforward. It can be a little cumbersome when it comes to trying to "break from the norm" and build web pages that are outside of the template-driven format; however, there are ways around this to create pages that break away from the normal page-template format of the website. In this regard, SDL Tridion can be pretty flexible, allowing us to create a lot of custom functionality to keep up with constantly changing web trends.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to use, just like Salesforce's other products. Many users can sit down and figure it out in no time, and with a little training become power users.
  • Fast and secure - Salesforce is a leader in the cloud world so you get consistently fast results and security that is top notch in the industry.
  • Accessible from anywhere - if you use cloud CMS already this is a no-brainer, but for those that do in-house CMS still, this is a major difference. Mobile access from anywhere on the planet without a VPN is something you just can't do without the cloud.
Read full review
  • Makes it easy to spin up a new site quickly
  • Allows for numerous users to work on the same site without conflicting with each other's changes
  • Allows you to unpublish changes or revert to old versions if you make a mistake
  • Allows you to time publishing actions (for example, you can set it to happen overnight)
Read full review
Cons
  • Organizations that are new to Salesforce need to be prepared for report building and other configurations. Customization is a great feature, but it can be overwhelming if not impossible for a brand new user.
  • Salesforce Trailhead is robust but can be confusing and overwhelming.
  • I'm currently comfortable with only using Salesforce CMS or any iteration on a desktop.
Read full review
  • If you are hoping to orbit the planet with a CMS, Tridion is built to leave the solar system. It is a very very powerful solution built for very serious enterprise businesses in hope of robust capabilities, which could be good or bad.
  • Supporting business users is a hefty lift and requires significant training and regular retraining, and support.
  • It's a niche solution that originally came out of Europe and was largely unknown in America. But today it's growing in popularity across the United States.
  • Finding capable support, and developers specializing in Tridion capabilities isn't always easy. And 8 years ago it was nearly impossible, involving finding European developer support shops in order to get the assistance needed. This is changing though and American developer firms are becoming more widely available.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It will be too difficult to change to a different software. We are fully integrated, and if things are not working well, it would be way worse to try to move to a different platform.
Read full review
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
Read full review
Usability
Strengths: - Intuitive for Salesforce Users – If you’re already working within the Salesforce ecosystem, the Salesforce CMS is easy to navigate, with a clean UI, drag-and-drop content management, and reusable assets for quick updates. - Seamless Integration – Since it connects natively with Experience Cloud, Marketing Cloud, and CRM, it allows for efficient multi-channel content distribution without needing extra third-party tools. - AI-Powered Personalization – The ability to deliver dynamic content based on user profiles and engagement data is a huge plus, making content delivery more relevant and impactful. Challenges: - Learning Curve for New Users – If you're not already familiar with Salesforce, the interface can feel overwhelming, requiring training to fully leverage all features. - Limited Customization & Workflow Automation – While it works well for structured content, advanced approval workflows and deep editorial customization are limited compared to enterprise CMS platforms like Adobe Experience Manager. - Media & Design Limitations – Salesforce CMS is not as robust for managing rich media-heavy content, which can be frustrating for teams needing more flexibility in multimedia presentation.
Read full review
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Seen very least outages and it would took more time hardley not more than 10 mins that to with prior advance notice
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Its very quick and not facing any issus in loading if we have good internet bandwidth then it works very well and doesnt gives any issues
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I've never really had to contact support. It's at the point where we have people in the organization that are our specific go-to inhouse support teams for Salesforce. Again, that goes back to what I said about there being a point where just too much is added to Salesforce that you have to hire someone to be the go-to person of Salesforce. There is only so much their support team can do for you. I wouldn't expect Salesforce Support to have any sort of understanding of the weird issues I deal with!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Since I attended training from one of our senior resource in organizations I didn't face any issues
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
N/A. I wasn't present for vendor-provided training.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I joined post the installtion so not aware much of it but as per feedback its not that hard to setup
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Salesforce CMS is way better with both optimization and reporting both of which Sonar Scheduling lacked. Our ability to skill technician or prioritize was lacking with Sonar. The API was very delayed with Sonar so changes on the Gantt had a delay that would throw off other team members. Sonar was cheaper but Salesforce CMS is way more capable.
Read full review
Interwoven teamsites, Documentum, Adobe - teamsites and documentum are old and limited. Adobe rocks but I like where I am and Tridion does a lot of the same things. No need to reinvent the wheel or move to a lateral product.
Read full review
Scalability
We've never run into issues no matter how many concurrent users!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It has a smooth integration with Salesforce CMS application which can make it a positive for enhanced performance.
  • It may require extensive training for new joiners and that can become costly for the organization.
  • It also has automation features that reduce the distribution time by a significant number.
Read full review
  • SDL is a very complex system. Creating custom components by external vendors turned out to be expensive.
  • The learning curve is very slow, so training takes a lot of time and cost.
  • The revamped corporate site looks clean, modern, and is mobile-friendly.
Read full review
ScreenShots