Salesforce Health Cloud vs. TELUS eClaims

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Salesforce Health Cloud
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Health Cloud is a patient and member relationship platform designed to deliver personalized engagement, and provide a complete view of the patient. With Health Cloud, care teams have access to clinical and non-clinical patient and member data including current health conditions and medications, appointment history, communication preferences, and data from the EHR and other systems. Teams are able to work across entire patient and member groups to provide care, faster.N/A
TELUS eClaims
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
TELUS eClaims is a medical billing solution designed to support a variety of practitioners including massage therapists, chiropractors, optometrists, or other allied healthcare professionals, supporting the payment process with an online service that streamlines the insurance claim process.N/A
Pricing
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Considered Both Products
Salesforce Health Cloud
Chose Salesforce Health Cloud
We also evaluated Epic's system called Cheers. Salesforce is much better organized and easy to use. Cheers had some major weaknesses.
Chose Salesforce Health Cloud
When it comes to Health Cloud in other CRM we have to create the related object and fields and we have to set [up] a complete architecture for the healthcare business to run over the CRM. But here Salesforce is proving a managed package, which is Health Cloud, has the framework …
TELUS eClaims

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Small Businesses
Tebra Billing & Payments
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 7.0 out of 10
Tebra Billing & Payments
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Salesforce Health CloudTELUS eClaims
Likelihood to Recommend
The best scenario [is] that it has [a] particular object which can directly store the records of the client [who] has purchased the policy and practitioner details with [their] expertise. The users can directly book the appointment using LWC or Aura components which can be exposed on websites. The object will be linked with each other [using] a lookup relation which creates a complete framework to handle the cases and details of the clients, [their] policies, and other details as well. Booking or finding a practitioner can be done with the [Salesforce] Health Cloud app where it can use [your] current location and provide details of [available] nearby doctors. Health Cloud supports live agent as well where a user can get the details on his insurance policy and get other help if he need from the chat option with live agent.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • [There] are particular objects such as person accounts which [are] linked with [health care company accounts if they have a policy].
  • We have flows and pages where a user or client can book [their] appointment with a practitioner and get instant help by raising a case or request for [an] appointment.
  • [Salesforce] Health Cloud keeps all the records of clients and practitioners and can link them when and where ever needed.
  • Objects in the managed package have [a] standard field which gives a perfect solution with out-of-the-box functionality without creating such a model or structure.
  • We can raise cases or requests and [use] automation tools like flows [so] the case will be assigned to [a] practitioner or the queue of the user.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • integration with Epic was close to impossible
  • buy-in from IT to support a system on Epic was not keen to work with decreased our ability to function in the way we expected
  • lack of knowing this integration challenge prior
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The software offers a wide range of functionality, which I truly appreciate. However, there is so much there that a lot of drilling into information can be required. This can create a significant learning curve for new users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We also evaluated Epic's system called Cheers. Salesforce is much better organized and easy to use. Cheers had some major weaknesses.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The process of implementation allowed us to better see our data downfalls in our parent EMR system and find ways around it
  • Reporting and dashboards allowed us to see the impact of marketing efforts as it related to appointments made
  • campaign features allowed us to see which campaigns related to which personas
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots