Marketing Cloud is an AI-powered, cloud-based digital marketing platform within the Salesforce Customer 360 ecosystem. Marketers can segment their audience, deliver personalized messages, track campaign performance, engage leads and accounts, and optimize strategies based on real-time insights.
$1,250
per month
Webtrends Optimize
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Webtrends Optimize is a web optimization platform and is offered by the company of the same name. The product competes most often with Adobe Test and Target, Maxymiser, SiteSpect, and Optimizely.
N/A
Pricing
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Webtrends Optimize
Editions & Modules
Account Engagement
$1,250
per month
Engagement
$1,250
per month
Intelligence
$3,000
per month
Loyalty Management
$20,000
per month
Personalization
$100,000
per year
Data Cloud for Marketing
$108,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Webtrends Optimize
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
There is no tiering and no different prices for different tools. The entire feature set is available to all users as standard at one price, agreed up front.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Webtrends Optimize
Considered Both Products
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
I have worked with all three providers across different businesses and seen the benefit of each one in different ways. It is good that Salesforce Marketing Cloud connects well with salesforce as a sales management CRM. Hubspot is a lot. more user friendly of an interface and …
I find the data stored in the database is very much cleansed and hence the overall decision making process improves. Also the customised emails, digital marketing features stacks the Salesforce Marketing Cloud way above others
We use Salesforce Marketing Cloud for lead management, generating reports, tracking customer and dealer information, inputting orders, and more. I prefer HubSpot for email marketing and automation because it is easier to use and the emails are designed much better. We …
I think that all of the marketing platforms I have evaluated and used in the past serve different markets and purposes. Salesforce Marketing Cloud was more palatable to our team because of our existing tech stack where we had Salesforce CRM already deployed and in use. Compared …
Hubspot is more user friendly, more intuitive, and has functionality built in from the start that allows you to get things off the ground faster than SFMC. I use SFMC because that is the current platform at my employer.
Mailchimp is great for simple email use. It's straightforward and great for beginners in the email space. It does not offer nearly as much in the way of complexity as Salesforce Marketing Cloud does, so is limited with what it can do. Salesforce Marketing Cloud is much more …
It has more features and a fuller capacity for all things marketing. Pardot was clunky and lacked a good email builder. It wasn't my choice to select this software, but I see its value, and the team has benefitted from it. We hope they continue to improve functionality and …
Salesforce Marketing Cloud is a more comprehensive product than HubSpot Marketing Cloud. It integrates better with multiple channels, is a powerful audience builder, and is an efficient AI. However, Salesforce Marketing Cloud is also more expensive and requires Salesforce.com …
Salesforce Marketing Cloud stands out for its comprehensive features, scalability, and seamless integration capabilities. Compared to other platforms, its unified suite of tools for email, social media, mobile, and advertising enables streamlined cross-channel campaign …
Not to sound like I am completely against Salesforce Marketing Cloud, I believe HubSpot has worked alot on their marketing platform to simplify the interface along with keeping the rich functions a marketing platform would want. Campaign monitor is a bit more basic, but perfect …
My previous organization used Pardot and also Mailchimp. Salesforce Marketing Cloud is more powerful than both of those tools and integrates more deeply with Salesforce CRM.
Overall, 80 percent of the features and boiler plate and standard across all these tools. Salesforce leads in integrations and global scalability. But lacks in User interface and ease of use.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud offers many opportunities for personalization and supports big data integration. It features powerful tools like SQL for data and AMPscript for email creation. If someone wants to master the platform, it might require some initial learning, which I …
We use these both in conjunction together now rather than rivals as the data that can be held in both does differ slightly and one platform email maker is slightly better so we do a lot of the creative in one platform and then have it link in and have all the data flow into the …
Salesforce Marketing Cloud is intuitive and does what it needs to do. The functions are easy to find, and the automation options work smoothly. You find an intuitive workspace in both HubSpot and Marketo Engage, and the options in these programs look similar to Salesforce Sales …
Pardot has a tighter integration with Salesforce CRM compared to Marketo. This allows for more seamless data transfer. MCAE has a slightly more user-friendly interface compared to Marketo, which can make it easier for non-technical users to navigate. From the cost perspective, …
Both products have a very similar approach on the Engagment part. At least at the time we used Hootsuite, it didn't had integration with Instagram, so that was a big win when we changed to Social Studio. Also, the automation tools of Social Studio were a great diferential in …
Salesforce Marketing Cloud stacks up well against Adobe Campaign and Sendinblue. I found it to be a more robust and feature-rich platform than Adobe Campaign and Sendinblue.
Salesforce is faster and has better and more logical visualisation. Salesforce is evolving and has more relevant products from one vendor. Salesforce proved its course to AI supported user activity. AI module exists in Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio, sure will …
The breadth of the services and features Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio offers stacks up against its competitors and makes it an ideal choice. The future scope of Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio is more impressive than its alternatives and the past …
There's a LOT of B2B software out there. It's easy to get lost in all of the incoherent noise, between different programs. Webtrends is constantly updating and working with their users to create the best experience possible. I would highly recommend webtrends, and as a second …
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of …
Webtrends, Qubit and Maxymiser were all excellent companies to work with. There's honestly not much between them in my experience. I selected Webtrends based on the quality of their consultants.
Webtrends Optimize can be used for much more complex tests, allows better conversion tracking and data collection. Visual Website Optimizer (VWO) is suitable for smaller, simple projects. Webtrends Optimize comes with an excellent consultancy that could save you a lot of time …
Webtrends Optimize definitely gave me a more comphrensive overview of the product
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Webtrends Optimize
Omniture: extreme feature set and integration with business intelligence and other systems. The problem was price. I was never able to convince management that the price tag was justified.
Features
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Webtrends Optimize
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Landing pages
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
List management
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
8.3
Ratings
6% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
Calendaring
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
8.2
Ratings
9% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
8.2
Ratings
11% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
-
Ratings
API
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizability
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Third-party software integrations
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Webtrends Optimize
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
a/b experiment testing
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Split URL testing
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multivariate testing
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mobile app testing
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test significance
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Advanced code editor
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Page surveys
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visitor recordings
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Preview mode
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test duration calculator
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Client-side tests
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Server-side tests
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Webtrends Optimize
8.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
At least for us, what we noticed is the best use case is that it replaces the use of cloud teams, which has a more complex platform to navigate; since we are already using Salesforce, it was just more straightforward to allow the teams to continue to do that as opposed to giving them a new system. This also works for us because they are both selling the same product in different ways. Any team collaboration is where this product shines.
There are certainly a few things to consider. If you're looking to run A/B/n or Multivariate tests with some basic segmentation or targeting then Webtrends Optimize is capable of providing that. If budget is a major consideration then that is another area where Optimize may be more attractive. However, based on both of these criteria it is my opinion that there are other tools out there that provide more value. For segmentation discovery, identification of user affinities, and execution of an effective targeting and personalization strategy then there are certainly other tools that should be considered.
The Webtrends team are excellent at taking the time to understand and learn about our distinct business needs, and recommend suggestions in response.
The Webtrends platform has undergone several changes over the time I was using it. This illustrates the constant thrive to improve their service to users, something I greatly appreciated.
Webtrends Optimize enables the whole process to be simple with its handy instructional guides that can inform clients about using the service.
The cost is a factor. When you're trying to save money, particularly as a startup (a lot of our clients are up-and-comers) it has to be seen as an investment...but the cost to implement the system is fairly large.
There's a bit of a steep learning curve, you can't just dive into the program.
It's not impossible but it's not as easy as snapping your fingers to easily implement the program cross-platform.
We are happy with Pardot. It has made our jobs easier and installed some reporting functions that have increased our ROI with the company. We have worked hard to set-up the functions in Pardot and it has taken time, but paid off.
You won't find another solution that has as many features as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio. We all know Salesforce, we all know how big they are and it's not for nothing... Their tools do most of the things you want, need and even imagine. Using it is complicated, but the usability is infinite.
Set up of basic tests that do not use segmentation or targeting is an intuitive experience that can be learned quickly by new users. However, as the need for segmentation and other more advanced capabilities arise, the experience begins to degrade.
Upgrades and timing of the upgrades were communicated well and planned during off hours for our work. If we did have a campaign scheduled during that time, it would kick-off after the system was back active. There were a few unplanned system down times, but it was a rare occurrence and those times were also short in duration.
Though the make up of MA apps is not built this way today, it would be nice to see them become more real-time. The integration between Salesforce and Pardot is not a true real-time integration. If I modify something in Salesforce, those changes are not automatically reflected in Pardot immediately. There is a delay of about 15 minutes before the systems sync. This delay, although not long, is less than ideal We would love the systems to be integrated real time such that changes are propagated from one system to the other immediately.
They are really responsive and more than not solve the problem or give you insight to how you can manage the solution yourself. I do find however sometimes a long delay on the more complex issues when they need to loop in other departments. but overall a good experience with support
Training program is not very well established. There is very little documentations. More often than not it's in-person training. I wish there were more video tutorials so that somebody can learn the system quickly. Their documentation is very much like an RFP. Long and very technichal. They should definitly improve on this area.
Pardot's online training touches on all topics briefly and vaguely without much indepth exploration into how a final outcome could look, such as Nurturing Campaigns, Email templates, landing page templates, etc... The only true way to uncover Pardot's full capabilities is to have Front End design and coding experience. Without this key skill set, I would not recommend Pardot to another business.
From an IT perspective, once you set up the Javascript beacon and start collecting data there is a waiting game. During this time you can start labeling your site actions which can be labor intensive for a single person, but you don't really have the final end-users on the platform yet. We did a lot of training so users were experienced, but it wasn't until they had their first tasks to accomplish that they started using the system and had questions. I'd recommend setting up some immediate goals for an end-user to start segmenting for the purpose of displaying message campaigns so you can jump start end-user action.
We use Salesforce Marketing Cloud for lead management, generating reports, tracking customer and dealer information, inputting orders, and more. I prefer HubSpot for email marketing and automation because it is easier to use and the emails are designed much better. We currently use Salesforce and HubSpot, and we are very happy to have both, as they have different pros/cons.
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of you gets what you pay for is true as they are a market leader in the optimization space.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud does a great job at what it is designed to do. There are several SaaS products in the Marketing Automation arena and SFMC is one of the top providers. There are several things it does well, such as email marketing and automation, leads generation/segmentation/qualification, and reporting/analytics. There are a few areas of improvement when it comes to the product and they surround legacy systems and architecture, outdated UI/UX, as well as targeting data in the activity logs for reporting and segmentation.
So far we haven't seen an ROI that we can accurately measure due to only running a couple of tests that haven't resulted in direct, site wide changes. However, we have learnt a lot about how to set up the right processes and documentation.