TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Salesforce Revenue Cloud

    Score8.8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud (formerly Salesforce CPQ or SteelBrick) is built and delivered on the Salesforce Platform and Salesforce1 Mobile App which enables users to create accurate sales quotes quickly and submit error-free orders on the fly from any device.

    $30

    Per User per Month

    Pricing
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $30
    Per User per Month
    Professional
    $50
    Per User per Month
    Enterprise
    $75
    Per User per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Considered Both Products
    Salesforce
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    This software is so complex we can say that Salesforce works so much better in the interface. Also, the features provided by Salesforce are far better than this software. It also includes Storing data, API development, and so many other functionalities which help a developer …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    This has better product capabilities like Manage Order, Mobile, pricing module, select product offers service channel. What I like best is the integration with Salesforce, the ability to create and connect opportunities and there is a lot of flexibility in this tool. It has a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    There is no comparison to a fully functional instance of CPQ. Nothing comes close due to the amount of customization and ease of use that CPQ offers once it's fully built out. Other solutions may be easier to build or administer, but for the users and business needs, CPQ is the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    It is complementary to salesforce so I don´t think there is a necessity to compare between Groove and Salesforce Revenue Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    SalesForce Revenue Cloud has been leaps and bounds ahead of the softwares I used to use! I had used Google Sheets at first (since it was free), then bought Excel briefly thinking that would suffice as a good CRM layout. Turns out I was wrong and needed something more. Revenue …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    This program is just more advanced and customizable. It worked for our diverse team needs considering the size and complexity of our portfolio. This was just the right choice for us. The other CRM's were great for smaller-scale enterprises at the time that I used them.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    This is an efficient tool and user-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Salesforce CPQ was faster in performance and suited our needs.
    Its direct integration on the SFDC platform made it easier to implement.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Salesforce CPQ [(formerly SteelBrick)] seamlessly integrates with Salesforce allowing us to have less integrations to manage. Releases don't break a connection causing delays in the sales process.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    We felt Salesforce had less risk with integrations to our CRM - also Big Machines couldn't handle our complexity.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    I don't know any competitor for Salesforce CPQ .
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    I haven't used PandaDoc, but a friend of mine uses it at their organization and recommended it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    It seemed really complicated comparably and didn’t seem to have the integration abilities that Salesforce CPQ has with Salesforce.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Salesforce stacks well in terms of features like lead, quote and pricing management than other software like Zoho, bichon, agile or HubSpot, personally I believe if the entire set of tools and solutions provided by Salesforce are employed they would work like a well-oiled …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Salesforces CPQ compares very highly to Apparound CPQ, because of the integration with the Salesforce platform. Because of the integration with the regular Salesforce platform, the tools work interchangeably with one another. This process creates a great deal of efficiency, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    CPQ is a more inline, integrated and user-friendly product compared to Apttus's offering. The fact that it was bought and embedded by Salesforce into the platform and the support that entails, was the big differentiator for us.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Salesforce CPQ is much better in user interaction, automation, AI, and integration with CRM, and other business systems.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    It is a strong offering if your a Salesforce customer. We previously used Panda Doc and the integration with Saleforce was just not robust enough as we've expanded. Panda Doc allowed for much more customization and control of templates. However, the pricing rules, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    It was not my choice to move to Salesforce CPQ. Our organization chose to move to this platform because Octiv gave the reps too much flexibility. They wanted to tighten the reins. Everyone hates Salesforce CPQ and the guy who implemented it isn't even at the company anymore.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    We looked into using BigMachines and FPX but decided to implement Apttus many years ago. The Apttus implementation never went live after several hiccups along the way and we shifted our focus to Salesforce CPQ which has had it's moments as well. Overall, Salesforce CPQ is the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    More enterprise related and trustworthy. There is a greater brand association - Salesforce for me.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    i did not make this decision
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Almost a no brainer as we already heavily use SalesForce. This process allowed for everything to be in one place. As stated before, it is better than our old solution because it pulls a lot of the info from the option for you, allows for you to cross-function with services …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    CPQ is much more intuitive and user-friendly than JDE. JDE is clunky and was not native to the Oracle CRM tool, which created problems when it came to quote creation and consistency in how deals are moved through the pipeline. We chose CPQ because we were already using SFDC as …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Feature
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    7.7
    32 Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending7.931 Ratings
    Product configuration5.132 Ratings
    Configuration options5.130 Ratings
    Pricing rules8.029 Ratings
    Price adjustment8.031 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts9.024 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal6.020 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics8.924 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration9.929 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes9.031 Ratings
    Order capturing8.014 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Salesforce Revenue Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (48 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.9
    (12 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)