SAP Access Control vs. Solutions2Share Teams Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAP Access Control
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
SAP Access control streamlines the process of managing and validating user access to applications and data with minimal support from IT, with the goal of giving employees the applications and services they need without exposing data and processes to unauthorized use.N/A
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…
$1.50
per year per user
Pricing
SAP Access ControlSolutions2Share Teams Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
XL: more than 4,000 users
€ 1.50
per year per user
Small: 1 - 249 users
€ 1500
per year
Medium: 250 - 999 users
€ 3780
per year
Large: 1,000 - 4,000 users
€ 6050
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP Access ControlTeams Manager
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$2,100 one-time fee
Additional DetailsInformation on Enterprise editions and Support packages can be found at the vendor's website.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAP Access ControlSolutions2Share Teams Manager
Considered Both Products
SAP Access Control
Chose SAP Access Control
Pathlock, CSI
We took GRC as it belongs to SAP.
In simple scenarios it integrates well with other SAP tools
Chose SAP Access Control
Pricing was higher for the cloud version of the BTP service - IAG. SAP Access Control pretty much facilitates everything we are looking for as an enterprise with an efficient dollar cost ROI for the services we are looking for. Also, there were many features on the cloud …
Chose SAP Access Control
SAP Access Control works complimentary to the above products
Chose SAP Access Control
Unlike other network access control tools such as SolarWinds Access Rights Manager , SAP Access Control removes other super users privileges whenever there is need to monitor and troubleshoot a problem. This helps in complete monitoring by keeping a log off performed when there …
Chose SAP Access Control
SAP Access Control provides end to end functionality. Designing and building of SAP roles, publishing the roles, ordering the access, and finally compliant user provisioning. While another solution has a dependency on SAP access control to ensure the compliant user …
Chose SAP Access Control
I have used SAP Analytics Cloud and SAP Access Control within my current organization. Both are wonderful in their own aspects and I highly recommend both for a medium to large sized company. We use both at the same time so I would not say it is a competitor or one replaces the …
Chose SAP Access Control
Depends on which ERP products your company uses. If your company uses SAP then SAP Access Control fits perfectly. As our company uses SAP systems for all process and business areas we used SAP Access Control. With latest GRC 12 version it is much better with S/4HANA application.
Teams Manager
Chose Teams Manager
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for …
Chose Teams Manager
As skype for business was getting outdated so we prefer Microsoft Teams over Skype.
Chose Teams Manager
Our general contractor for the build-out selected MT over Zoom. It was not our choice. Zoom has a bit more movement with background screen images and vid quality but it's all fairly close.
Chose Teams Manager
We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our …
Chose Teams Manager
As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote.
Best Alternatives
SAP Access ControlSolutions2Share Teams Manager
Small Businesses
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Score 6.9 out of 10
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAP Access ControlSolutions2Share Teams Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAP Access ControlSolutions2Share Teams Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Appropriate for SAP hrs hierarchy integration and can have multiple hierarchies of org structures adopted as alternative workflow support. Cons of access control are the logs of firefighter usage are still limited in depth and does not evolve to adop more cloud products which are coming at a plaster pace than the ac product as such.
Read full review
For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.
Read full review
Pros
  • SAP Access Control ensures that our services are accessed by the right users since it send me alerts when an employee tries to access any application. That way, I am able to either authorize or cancel the request to safeguard of company data.
  • With SAP Access Control, it is easy to automate and monitor how our team access services and applications. SAP Access Control has an automatic feature that notifies me when employees access applications and services and the issues they are encountering.
  • In addition, SAP Access Control add security on employees login to ensure that their data on the applications are encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers.
Read full review
  • Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great.
  • Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests.
  • Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern.
Read full review
Cons
  • It still uses the webdynpro for the front end. All webdynpro applications should be migrated to Fiori for a better user experience.
  • Some functionalities can't manage in mass way. I.E. building derive roles/multiple single roles,
  • Interface with LDAP is not efficient.
Read full review
  • The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly.
  • Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done.
  • Making calls through Teams has not been very successful.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are very happy with it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
This is a great tool for a medium to large sized company. SAP Access Control requires a great deal of SAP knowledge to use, but it is certainly information that can be learned. Their customer support is wonderful and easy to work with. The overall usability is great. I greatly recommend this software.
Read full review
It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.
Read full review
Support Rating
This product fulfills all our requirements. We can use this for user management, role management, risk analysis, business role management, workflow management. Initial configuration takes a lot of effort. Otherwise it's a great product for the end user. SAP Access Control tool performance needs improvement, sometimes it slows down the processing time for requests.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Unlike other network access control tools such as SolarWinds Access Rights Manager , SAP Access Control removes other super users privileges whenever there is need to monitor and troubleshoot a problem. This helps in complete monitoring by keeping a log off performed when there is troubleshooting in progress.
Read full review
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reducing risk of fraud. Implementing SAP Access Control allows analysis of every role assigned to a job on the organization. Through this analysis, weakness on roles are detected, corrected and monitored. As the users feel the change, they also feel that they are being monitored, preventing any intent to use his position and privileges to take personal advantage. So a major impact to organizations is to reduce the financial lost due to frauds.
  • Reducing cost for monitoring. Another positive impact is lowering the cost of monitoring. This is twofold: First, a rather small team can manage access management. Second, through the use of SAP Access Control the complete universe of roles and users can be monitored without increasing the cost for the continuous monitoring.
  • During transactions. The use of SAP Access Controls allows detection of transactions that, from an information security point of view, require some redesign. When SAP GCR is implemented, you make some discoveries such as: obsolete transactions, transactions with no authorization objects and the like. The transactions with these problems can be left out of the active roles, waiting for remediation of the issues found.
Read full review
  • Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
  • Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)
Read full review
ScreenShots

Teams Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of Governance Dashboard and Reports – for an overview of Microsoft 365 environmentsScreenshot of Automated request and approval process for new teams, M365 groups and SharePoint sitesScreenshot of Templates and provisioning for teams and SharePoint Sites (with channels, tabs, apps, folders, Planner with tasks, OneNote with content and more)Screenshot of Lifecycles for teams: inactive or obsolete teams can automatically be archived or even deleted after a specified period of timeScreenshot of Naming conventions for teams, OneNotes and Planners: rules for uniform, relevant names with predefined prefixes and suffixesScreenshot of Mobile view for all functionalities