SAP Audit Management vs. TrackWise

Best on my experience, SAP Audit Management is best suited for larger corporations, particularly those that want to work with bigger OEMs in a more efficient manner over time. Furthermore, it is best suited in managing capacity, quality, production planning, work in progress in manufacturing, project tracking and project planning and management.

Incentivized

Trackwise is an excellent tool to track activities and action items. We specifically used it to track quality management systems such as NCRs and CAPAs and include action steps and sign-offs. I would not use it to track projects that have significant data uploads.

Incentivized

• Safely managing big data involving in many fields like quality, project tracking, and manufacturing-related stuff,
• Integrating with many other tools widely utilized in plant teams.
• Ford and IATF auditors used to track down the details with a similar interface, making SAP familiar.

Incentivized

• It has a great structure for child-parent relations. You can easily review your record and also the child records associated with the parent record.
• Ability to create customized dashboards for your queries.
• User friendly interface and ability to customize desktop layout.
• Ability to create and customize reports in the required file type.
• Capability to link records.
• Easy to define user roles and group categories for user permissions.

• Currently an integrated solution - would prefer to see a continuous solution
• Limited predictive audit functionality
• The big data functionality is more marketing than reality

Incentivized

• Query was limited and slow

Incentivized

The user experience is great and I would recommend other's to use trackwise for it's customization flexibility

It is easy to use. Easy navigation. Flexible to customize. Real-time analytics help to track the record cycle time. Can be used by multiple departments for various business processes.

This tool helps internal auditors for scoping, risk assessment, resource management, and project management of internal audits. Due to the streamlining and automated audit process, it lowers audit cost and time for auditing. This can be integrated with analytics tools for risk analytics and make KPI of higher management. Issue tracking, audit, and log report generation are very simple.

Incentivized

I did not interact with the support team.

Incentivized

I wouldn't say there is a true peer to SAP Audit Management currently available on the market. SAP Audit Management is the only software that is. It is designed by and developed for audit practitioners across the world. Further, the software unlocks the disparate information for Internal Audit departments and supports audit experts in their day-to-day activities with an easy to use. collaborative, and risk-based approach towards audit procedures.

Incentivized

Trackwise is better than Arena. You need sign-offs before moving to the next step. While in Arena, you can complete the whole task and request sign off later. Not sure which is better for everyone, but I prefer to sign off before moving to the next step.

Incentivized

• Lower audit cost due to streamlining of the audit process and reporting.
• Integration of risk management, process control, and access control.
• Can be integrated with analytics tools for proper analytics.
• If an organization using multiple ERP systems, this tool is not much useful.
• For SMEs, it is more expensive to manage.

Incentivized

• Got rid of paper tracking.
• Saves time by easily searching data base.

Incentivized