SAP Build vs. WaveMaker

SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.

Incentivized

WaveMaker is a great platform for enterprise and SME's because it can save a lot on resources and time. The price is very low compared to the other competitors of WaveMaker and the best thing about WaveMaker is its no lock-in policy, you can always download the code and work on other IDEs. Overall an amazing platform.

Incentivized

• Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
• No code feature to build any type of website
• Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
• The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks

Incentivized

• WaveMaker has helped us create internal applications in very short amount of time at a very low cost.
• The interface is really clean and it is easy to understand, you need not be an expert coder to work on WaveMaker.
• You can download your developed application and deploy it on any server you wish. There is no lock in whatsoever.
• The support team is super supportive and they are genuinely interested in solving your problems.
• WaveMaker helps you develop web and hybrid applications simultaneously, so you will be saving a lot of time and effort.
• WaveMaker is constantly upgrading and the team makes sure that they inform the users about the upgrades.

Incentivized

• Comparing to other RPA Tools, SAP Build automation lacks enough user guidance.
• Licensing is a little bit confusing.
• From a technical perspective, older versions of the automation part are not always stable, but the other services (workflow, business rules, apps, etc.) are much more stable.

Incentivized

• I believe that for this case, is important the technical support, which solves you or give workarounds that work for your issues. It answers in 24 hours, in labour days.

Incentivized

The SAP Build Apps is definitely getting better, however it is still not as easy to use and complete as some other solutions. This makes it a bit harder to use for Functional Consultants for example. SAP Build Process automation on the other hand is so easy, that everybody can build processes in it.

Incentivized

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

There were instances where we had specific requests and the support team was really helpful because they were really concerned about getting me a solution.

Incentivized

Bubble.io is more user-friendly in comparison with SAP AppGyver. The latter being practically a free tool provides enough functionality to achieve results though while Bubble.io doesn't let you export your projects without a paid subscription. Bubble.io has great initial tour and tutorial integrated into the platform that can be handy for any new beginner while SAP AppGyver can be a little overwhelming.

Incentivized

WaveMaker is much cheaper and performs better.

• After using SAP Build we were able to develop products 20% faster than earlier
• It has also increased our revenue by 15%
• Our developer team is using this from past 1 year and we were able to reduce the churn by 10%

Incentivized

• WaveMaker has helped us reduce the number of developers working on the application development.
• It has helped us save a lot of time.

Incentivized