TrustRadius

SAP Build vs. Xano

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAP Build
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SAP Build is a business application development and automation solution with a comprehensive suite of low-code, pro-code, and generative AI tools. SAP Build is for developers, IT professionals, and business users/citizen developers who want to create and customize business applications.
$1.82
per month per user
Xano
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Xano is a web development platform with revenue sharing capabilities built into its core, from the company of the same name in Woodland Hills. Through its data requirement framework, it is designed to lower the barrier of entry for those looking for an easy-to-use development platform without the restrictions and rigidness of competing solutions.
$85
per month billed annually
Pricing
SAP BuildXano
Editions & Modules
SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
$1.82
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
$15
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
$534
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
$534
per month
Launch
$85
per month billed annually
Launch
$99
per month
Scale 1x
$199
per month billed annually
Scale 1x
$225
per month
Build
Free
Agency
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP BuildXano
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAP BuildXano
Considered Both Products
SAP Build
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
It is a great product for application development
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
As per clean core it's regarding
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
We prefer to use SAP Build to help our SAP customers due to its native connectivity, integration, and seamless experience.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
We are also using Uipath for RPA automation; I believe it works better for complex processes than SAP Build, but its functionalities are limited to RPA. SAP Build also offers functionalities around Workflow, which is lacking in Uipath. So, it is still OK in processes like …
IH
Ishant Harjai
Business Development Manager
Chose SAP Build
Well, all these tools are designed for different purposes. So there are no Comparisions. I will completely use one tool for sales forecasting and then other tool for data automation.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
SAP Build stands out in comparison to other tools due to its comprehensive features and user-friendly interface. We selected SAP Build for its robust capabilities in facilitating the design and prototyping phases of our projects. The tool's versatility allows for efficient …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
Too Limited in functionallitys at the moment to be really production ready
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
Because SAP Build has it all in a single place and service
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
UiPath has better integrations in terms of third party applications but SAP Build seems to be catching up pretty quickly
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose SAP Build
Mendix and Neptune also provides platform when apps can be created efficiently without have any prior programming skills but SAP Build Process Automation is where SAP excels.
Xano

No answer on this topic

Features
SAP BuildXano
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
SAP Build
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Xano
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAP BuildXano
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAP BuildXano
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAP BuildXano
Likelihood to Recommend
SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.
Nikita Vinichenko | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nikita Vinichenko
Marketing Manager CRM
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
  • No code feature to build any type of website
  • Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
  • The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks
IH
Ishant Harjai
Business Development Manager
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Firstly there is a scope to reduce the pricing so that it can be more affordable.
  • The customer support team is bit slow so it takes some time to get the answers for your queries.
  • The integration is not so straightforward and it takes good amount of time.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Because I think it is fairly easy to navigate. But at the same time, I still think it’s not mature enough for non-developers. At least for our use cases, it has been needed to perform coding in some sense. But ofc. I think joule will help a lot here.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
VK
Virve Kiuru
Solution and Process Manager
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more secure coupling with SAP services.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • SAP Build significantly reduces the effort on the integration side compared to other LCNC platforms.
  • From a licensing perspective, the platform can kind of lock you in, but that's also true for other cloud platforms as well.
  • Creating an app that fully works with your ERP (especially if you have S4HANA as the ERP System) is fast. It enables quick prototyping.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

SAP Build Screenshots

Screenshot of The SAP Build Portfolio, which includes: 1- SAP Build Apps to create business application 2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes 3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites