Selenium vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Selenium
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Selenium is open source software for browser automation, primarily used for functional, load, or performance testing of applications.N/A
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
Pricing
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Features
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Selenium
-
Ratings
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
User Ratings
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
When you have to test the UI and how it behaves when certain actions are performed, you need something that can automate the browsers. This is where Selenium comes to the rescue. If you have to test APIs and not the frontend (UI), I would recommend going with other libraries that support HTTP Requests. Selenium is good only when you have no choice but to run the steps on a browser.
Read full review
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
Pros
  • For any web based UI automation, Selenium is the best tool out there to automate your tests.
  • It supports multiple coding languages like Java, Python, Ruby, C# etc.. to choose from.
  • There is a huge community of users and can get many answers on StackOverFlow.
  • It has lot of other plugins to make your tests even more efficient.
Read full review
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
Cons
  • Recognize Adobe Flash and MS Silver Light elements without additional help
  • Detect and locate Java applets ingredients
  • Having the "Wait-till-Displayed" or "Wait-till-Present" as a built in Web Driver function instead of requirement for writing loops and defining expliccit wait, visiblewait, invisiblewait, etc.
Read full review
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We love this product mainly because of its high customization abilities and the ease of use. Moreover, its free and can be learned easily through online communities and videos. The tests are more consistent and reliable as compared to Manual tests. It has enabled us to test a large number of features all in one go, which would have impossible through manual tests. The reports generated at the end of the tests are really helpful for the QA and the development teams to get a fair view of the application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
As I mentioned earlier, the reason I use Selenium is because there is a fairly widespread community of users, and user support services are at a good level. because the application is open source, it works on many platforms (Windows, Linux, IOS) without any problems. In addition, it gives us a lot of options for writing functional tests. For errors that we receive through the application, we can easily find the reasons for errors in the forums.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Selenium does not have technical support available easily. You have to go through forums to get the information you need. However, there are excellent forums out there that make it easy to troubleshoot. The open-source flexibility makes it difficult to have dedicated support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We did everything we needed to use it. Now we can execute our tests on different operational systems and browsers running few tests simultaneously. We also implemented Appium framework to execute our tests on mobile devices, such as iPhones, iPads, Android phones and tablets. We use SauceLabs for our test execution and Jenkins for continuous integration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
At the time of adoption, there were not many other alternatives that were even close to being competitive when it comes to browser testing. As far as I know now to this day, there is still little competition to Selenium for what it does. Any other browser-based testing still utilises Selenium to interact with the browser.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Generation of detailed finding reports helped in cost savings in regard to direct labor.
  • Quality Assurance technicians found value in repeating mundane duties that they perform daily. It saved mental energy due to the automation process.
  • The value was established in high volume usage in setting up meetings as well as new accounts with A/B testing. Also merely cleaning up old test documents by evaluating them and organization or deletion.
Read full review
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
ScreenShots