Sendspark

Sendspark

55 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Sendspark	Score10 out of 10	N/A	Sendspark helps businesses connect to customers with personalized video messages. Whether the user is an individual, manager, or enterprise, Sendspark can be used to create polished videos for demand generation, sales, or customer success. Videos can be shared in Gmail, LinkedIn, or email marketing platforms — wherever communication with customers is happening — to drive higher engagement.	$0 per month per user

Pricing

Sendspark

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Sendspark
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Sendspark
Considered Both Products	Sendspark David Kocsis CEO in Corporate at Guru Muscle (Apparel & Fashion, 11-50 employees) Chose Sendspark Anytime we onboard a new client Sendspark sends all customer's details back to Hubspot. This is so handy as it's an automated process. If you prefer to use Zoho then no problem. It's in Sendspark as well. It would be great to use webhooks and API. But it's coming very soon. Incentivized Helpful? Danish Tahir Marketing Director in Marketing at Study Advisers (Education Management, 51-200 employees) Chose Sendspark Loom provides all basic features of screen recording software but because they are established now, they sometimes fail to work on customer feedback while Sendspark is always innovative e.g one of the life-saving features is a link to share with customers to record their … Incentivized Helpful? Traycie Antonio Business Steward at SpeakLife2Me LLC. (Professional Training & Coaching, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark No brainer. Stick with what is easy, has great customer service, and more functionality to be unique to your brand. Sendspark is the way to go for simplicity and the pricing is more affordable. Incentivized Helpful? Dr Paul S. Bates Co-Founder in Sales at The NewtonBates Group (Management Consulting, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Virtually all other video platforms have more functions, more functionality, more integrations, and more ways to customize everything. The only exception is (possibly) Vidyard. Layers of complexity lead to inertia. That leads to plenty of excuses to not incorporate video into a … Incentivized Helpful? Bruno Marsala Mortgage Agent in Marketing at Bruno Marsala - Mortgage Agent (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Former user of BombBomb. In fact, let my account lapse when I discovered how much easier this product was to use (and cheaper). Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark Simpler and easier to use. Users are not intimidated when using Sendspark because it's less complicated. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark While Sendspark has a bit less functionality than popular rivals such as Loom and CloudApp, its affordability and simplicity have ultimately caused us to stick around. We are confident with the continued upgrades and functionality Sendspark is developing, it will continue to be … Incentivized Helpful? Dipankar Zalpuri Account Director in Marketing at YouMe&We Marketing, PR, Events (Public Relations & Communications, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Pretty much similar in terms of delivery and usability. Both have a free version. But I like the flexibility of storage on demand as well as the UI seems to be more adaptable with Sendspark. In terms of functionality there is room for improvement thought but it is still early … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark Sendspark's ease of use and animated gif generation are two distinct advantages of this platform. Incentivized Helpful? Quan Nguyen Founder in Marketing at Testifyd (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Sendspark has more flexibility with branding, faster uploads, easier to use Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark So far I love it and cant compare it to other software. Incentivized Helpful? Ed Roos CEO (Chief Executive Officer) in Marketing at LocalSEO (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Sendspark is much better than Loom: - CNAME - Complete white label Incentivized Helpful? Raelyn Tan Xin Hui Founder & CEO in Marketing at RT Marketing (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Loom's video quality is better and renders faster, but Sendspark is catching up fast. Incentivized Helpful? Ashao FreeSky CEO (Chief Executive Officer) at DoubleYourTimeOff.com (Professional Training & Coaching, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark I've used Loom and Bonjoro. I switched to Sendspark because it basically does what both of those do so I only need one tool instead of two. Incentivized Helpful? Terence Tan Owner in Corporate at Launch Growth LLP (Management Consulting, 11-50 employees) Chose Sendspark I see a lot more flexibility and room for growth in Sendspark. The team is very [responsive and has] an excellent direction and roadmap of how they want to grow Sendspark. The ability to have Video Landing Pages is awesome and their video engagement analytics is superb as well. … Incentivized Helpful? Edward Toscano VD in Professional Services at Mercury Advance (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Sendspark stands among other solutions due to the perspective behind the tool. They are trying to improve business conversion and client experiences by humanizing and customizing the touchpoints across different channels. People got tired of simple emails and tasteless contacts;… Incentivized Helpful? Philippe JACQUET Internet Marketing Manager in Corporate at La DOUDERIE (Cosmetics, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Loom is a must-have but I found Sendspark more useful. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark Well… to be honest, I decided to give it a try because of the price. Incentivized Helpful? Abhimanyu Singh Rathore Webmaster in Professional Services at Online Web Studio (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Compared to Loom, Sendspark's UI looked much better. In terms of cost for solopreneurs, hands down they are a gem. Incentivized Helpful? Richard Fallah Founder in Corporate at VBOUT.com (Marketing & Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Sendspark More affordable at scale, better support, lighter product. Incentivized Helpful? Steve Jones CEO (Chief Executive Officer) in Marketing at ClickMovements (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Over the years, I've tried Loom and Vidyard but SendSpark trumps them all with white-labeling and reasonable costs. Incentivized Helpful? David Taggart Founder in Corporate at Bighorn Investment Research LLC (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Sendspark Camtasia is fine but it is not as simple to use, is not cloud-based, and the client has to download software to record their own screen and respond to your emails. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark Best all-around choice. It may not be as specialized as the others but it gives you the ability to do everything you need to get done as a solo freelancer without having to pay 3 different subscriptions for video tools that all do the same thing in a slightly different way. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Sendspark I used Loom before Sendspark and I think SendSpark is more economical and startup-friendly. Loom started off great and had a free plan. Eventually, things started getting pretty expensive and they started shutting down the free plan bit by bit till it became very limited. … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Sendspark
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (1 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (1 ratings)
Performance	8.2 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.3 (1 ratings)