TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MySQL

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AMySQL is a popular open-source relational and embedded database, now owned by Oracle.N/A

    SingleStore

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/ASingleStore aims to enable organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads in one unified platform.

    $0.69

    per hour

    Pricing
    MySQLSingleStore
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    OnDemand
    $0.69
    per hour
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MySQLSingleStore
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MySQLSingleStore
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    Chose MySQL
    Cost: StartUp companies don't have the money to invest large amount of money in pricey databases. By using Mysql, the saving is huge.
    Incentivized
    SingleStore
    Chose SingleStore
    We knew early on that MySQL (Amazon Aurora) would not be suitable for this workload as it cannot query our time series data as fast as SingleStore. We also use MongoDB Atlas for another application but we could not achieve the raw speed we saw from SingleStore. Our technical …
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    We found SingleStore to be significantly superior to bare-bones MySQL as it offers better performance and scalability. It is also richer in terms of the query language supported, stored procedures, and connectivity. We also found it to be more robust than MySQL and with better …
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    The SQL dialect seems to be pretty compatible, and I especially appreciate that you can connect to it with native MySQL tooling.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    Both MySQL and SingleStore are relational databases but when comparing performance and stability, SingleStore is significantly better in handling large datasets and the UI is also much better than that of MySQL.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    SingleStore provides a solution for working with larger amount of data (vs. MySQL) with better performance (vs. BigQuery) without having to preprocess the data (vs. MongoDB), so basically it does better for specific use cases.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    We evaluated SingleStore against MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Druid. We have also quickly looked at ClickHouse and Pinot. We found SingleStore was a polished installation and operation was a breeze. That, coupled with the great performance, led us to select SingleStore very quickly …
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    We evaluated Spanner, VoltDB and MySQL clustering. SingleStore gave us the feature set without us having to have a dedicated database engineer.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    first of all SingleStoreis a cluster with high availability and easy to use.
    you need to design you tables / procedures such in a way that your SingleStore perform well and with handle heavy load
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    No contest
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    SingleStore is built for fast data ingestion and fast queries against large tables (> billions of rows). This is possible because of the column store engine that SingleStore uses. SingleStore also support a memory engine. Pipelines is also another big advantage. Being able to …
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    SingleStore provides an abstraction layer in managing a sharded database solution reducing complexity for the FLOWD team. Coupled with the SingleStore Managed Service, we are partnering with SingleStore to provide FLOWD services to various utilities & councils.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    SingleStore outperformed both MongoDB and PostgreSQL for OLAP workloads. Its ability to shard data and handle parallel processing of SQL "JOIN" queries across shards is a game changer.
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    SingleStore achieves same or much better performance, while avoiding all data sync and migration
    Incentivized
    Chose SingleStore
    much faster processing of queries than all above-listed databases and having the ability to scale up according to the workload.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    MySQLSingleStore
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (135 ratings)
    7.6
    (70 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.9
    (4 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.2
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (44 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    8.3
    (9 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)