Solutions2Share Teams Manager vs. Symantec IGA

For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.

Incentivized

If an organization is looking for a good comprehensive identity management/governance suite that is easy to implement, CA identity manager may be a good/robust product. It is best to understand specific use case for your organization and try out the product before a final purchase decision as is the case with all sw products.

Incentivized

• Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great.
• Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests.
• Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern.

Incentivized

• It has complete identity management and governance capabilities equipped with a simple, intuitive user experience and helps simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications. This in turn helps in improved productivity and user satisfaction.

Incentivized

• The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly.
• Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done.
• Making calls through Teams has not been very successful.

Incentivized

• Bringing on new users and removing existing user when new employee/contractors join or leave an organization can be improved by linking directly to HR module.
• The slightly complicated GUI makes drill down difficult for a new user.

Incentivized

It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.

Incentivized

Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.

Incentivized

The final contenders were CA and Oracle - Oracle was tedious to implement and maintain while on the other hand CA was easy to implement and maintain and came at a much lower price.

Incentivized

• Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
• Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)

Incentivized

• For us, it was a fairly easy implementation over 60 day period that provided ROI fairly quickly

Incentivized